NobleBlocks

Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts

governmentCanberra, Australia

Research output, citation impact, and the most-cited recent papers from Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts (Australia). Aggregated across the NobleBlocks index of 300M+ scholarly works.

Total works
4
Citations
5
h-index
1
i10-index
0
Also known as
Department of Infrastructure and Regional DevelopmentDepartment of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and CommunicationsDepartment of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts

Top-cited papers from Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts

Telecommunications infrastructure in Australia
Andrew Madsen, Michael De Percy
2020· Australian Journal of Social Issues5doi:10.1002/ajs4.121

Abstract This paper considers Australia’s approach to telecommunications infrastructure from the perspectives of the policy official and the public administration scholar. From the official’s perspective, the approach has been successful in stimulating private sector investment in many markets. This has been achieved by promoting open competition and where necessary establishing a government business enterprise as a transitional measure to build and operate a next‐generation National Broadband Network (NBN) to provide high‐speed fixed‐line broadband to all Australian premises by 2020. From the academic perspective, however, the approach reveals the shifting balances between political objectives and market challenges. This paper consists of three main parts. The first is an introduction by a former senior public servant turned public administration scholar. The second is from a policy official and provides an overview of the Australian telecommunications market, starting with some historical context, the deregulation in the 1990s and the privatisation of the former government‐owned telecommunications incumbent, Telstra. The third is from a public administration scholar and provides a short complementary critique of Australia’s communications policy. The paper discusses, from different perspectives, the policy settings that have been adopted to support infrastructure competition and investment in the Australian telecommunications market, including the development of the NBN.

The Dual Risks of Digital Exclusion and Unaffordability of Telecommunications in Lower‐Income Australian Households
Ewa Orzechowska‐Fischer, Emily Rose, Robert Breunig
2024· Australian Economic Reviewdoi:10.1111/1467-8462.12569

Abstract We analyse household telecommunications spending in Australia over the period 2006–2021 using Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey data. We find the affordability of telecommunications is improving, and that telecommunications spending behaves like other core necessities, such as food. We find households in which members are not employed, have relatively low education, are elderly, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders or immigrants, speak English poorly, reside alone, or have long‐term health conditions are at heightened risk of digital exclusion due to lower spending on telecommunications. Households located in rural areas, with children or with members that work from home are at higher risk of digital exclusion as a consequence of overspending on telecommunications. Overall, the number of people at risk of digital exclusion from inadequate spending or overspending is quite small in Australia. The risks appear to have decreased during COVID‐19. Telecommunications is a core necessity but given the small number of people at risk of exclusion, policies addressing affordability should be highly targeted .