Madigan Army Medical Center

This document represents the first collaboration between 2 organizations-the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the Society of Critical Care Medicine-to describe best practices in nutrition therapy in critically ill children. The target of these guidelines is intended to be the pediatric critically ill patient (>1 month and <18 years) expected to require a length of stay >2-3 days in a PICU admitting medical, surgical, and cardiac patients. In total, 2032 citations were scanned for relevance. The PubMed/MEDLINE search resulted in 960 citations for clinical trials and 925 citations for cohort studies. The EMBASE search for clinical trials culled 1661 citations. In total, the search for clinical trials yielded 1107 citations, whereas the cohort search yielded 925. After careful review, 16 randomized controlled trials and 37 cohort studies appeared to answer 1 of the 8 preidentified question groups for this guideline. We used the GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to adjust the evidence grade based on assessment of the quality of study design and execution. These guidelines are not intended for neonates or adult patients. The guidelines reiterate the importance of nutrition assessment-particularly, the detection of malnourished patients who are most vulnerable and therefore may benefit from timely intervention. There is a need for renewed focus on accurate estimation of energy needs and attention to optimizing protein intake. Indirect calorimetry, where feasible, and cautious use of estimating equations and increased surveillance for unintended caloric underfeeding and overfeeding are recommended. Optimal protein intake and its correlation with clinical outcomes are areas of great interest. The optimal route and timing of nutrient delivery are areas of intense debate and investigations. Enteral nutrition remains the preferred route for nutrient delivery. Several strategies to optimize enteral nutrition during critical illness have emerged. The role of supplemental parenteral nutrition has been highlighted, and a delayed approach appears to be beneficial. Immunonutrition cannot be currently recommended. Overall, the pediatric critical care population is heterogeneous, and a nuanced approach to individualizing nutrition support with the aim of improving clinical outcomes is necessary.

Practice guidelines are not intended as absolute requirements. The use of these practice guidelines does not in any way project or guarantee any specific benefit in outcome or survival. The judgment of the healthcare professional based on individual circumstances of the patient must always take precedence over the recommendations in these guidelines. The guidelines offer basic recommendations that are supported by review and analysis of the pertinent available current literature, by other national and international guidelines, and by the blend of expert opinion and clinical practicality. The “intensive care unit” (ICU) or “critically ill” patient is not a homogeneous population. Many of the studies on which the guidelines are based are limited by sample size, patient heterogeneity, variability in definition of disease state and severity of illness, lack of baseline nutrition status, and lack of statistical power for analysis. Whenever possible, these factors are taken into account and the grade of statement will reflect the power of the data. One of the major methodological problems with any guideline is defining the exact population to be included. These guidelines may be subject to periodic review and revision based on new peer-reviewed critical care nutrition literature and practice. These guidelines are intended for the adult medical and surgical critically ill patient populations expected to require an ICU stay of > 2 or 3 days and are not intended for those patients in the ICU for temporary monitoring or those who have minimal metabolic or traumatic stress. These guidelines are based on populations, but like any other therapeutic treatment in an ICU patient, nutrition requirements and techniques of access should be tailored to the individual patient. The intended use of these guidelines is for all individuals involved in the nutrition therapy of the critically ill, primarily physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and respiratory and physical therapists where indicated. A list of guideline recommendations was compiled by the experts on the Guidelines Committee for the 2 societies, each of which represented clinically applicable definitive statements of care or specific action statements. Prospective randomized controlled trials were used as the primary source to support guideline statements, with each study being evaluated and given a level of evidence. The overall grade for the recommendation was based on the number and level of investigative studies referable to that guideline. Large studies warranting level I evidence were defined as those with ≥100 patients or those which fulfilled endpoint criteria predetermined by power analysis. The level of evidence for uncontrolled studies was determined by whether they included contemporaneous controls (level III), historical controls (level IV), or no controls (level V, equal to expert opinion). See Table 1 . 1 Review papers and consensus statements were considered expert opinion and were designated the appropriate level of evidence. Meta-analyses were used to organize the information and to draw conclusions about an overall treatment effect from multiple studies on a particular subject. The grade of recommendation, however, was based on the level of evidence of the individual studies. An A or B grade recommendation required at least 1 or 2 large positive randomized trials supporting the claim, while a C grade recommendation required only 1 small supportive randomized investigation. The rationale for each guideline statement was used to clarify certain points from the studies, to identify controversies, and to provide clarity in the derivation of the final recommendation. Significant controversies in interpretation of the literature were resolved by consensus of opinion of the committee members, which in some cases led to a downgrade of the recommendation. Following an extensive review process by external reviewers, the final guideline manuscript was reviewed and approved by A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and SCCM's Board of Regents and Council. The significance of nutrition in the hospital setting cannot be overstated. This significance is particularly noted in the ICU. Critical illness is typically associated with a catabolic stress state in which patients commonly demonstrate a systemic inflammatory response. This response is coupled with complications of increased infectious morbidity, multi-organ dysfunction, prolonged hospitalization, and disproportionate mortality. Over the past 3 decades, the understanding of the molecular and biological effects of nutrients in maintaining homeostasis in the critically ill population has made exponential advances. Traditionally, nutrition support in the critically ill population was regarded as adjunctive care designed to provide exogenous fuels to support the patient during the stress response. This support had 3 main objectives: to preserve lean body mass, to maintain immune function, and to avert metabolic complications. Recently these goals have become more focused on nutrition therapy, specifically attempting to attenuate the metabolic response to stress, to prevent oxidative cellular injury, and to favorably modulate the immune response. Nutritional modulation of the stress response to critical illness includes early enteral nutrition, appropriate macro- and micronutrient delivery, and meticulous glycemic control. Delivering early nutrition support therapy, primarily using the enteral route, is seen as a proactive therapeutic strategy that may reduce disease severity, diminish complications, decrease length of stay in the ICU, and favorably impact patient outcome. A1. Traditional nutrition assessment tools (albumin, prealbumin, and anthropometry) are not validated in critical care. Before initiation of feedings, assessment should include evaluation of weight loss and previous nutrient intake prior to admission, level of disease severity, comorbid conditions, and function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. (Grade: E) Rationale. In the critical care setting, the traditional protein markers (albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, retinol binding protein) are a reflection of the acute phase response (increases in vascular permeability and reprioritization of hepatic protein synthesis) and do not accurately represent nutrition status in the ICU setting. Anthropometrics are not reliable in assessment of nutrition status or adequacy of nutrition therapy.2,3 A2. Nutrition support therapy in the form of enteral nutrition (EN) should be initiated in the critically ill patient who is unable to maintain volitional intake. (Grade: C) Rationale. EN supports the functional integrity of the gut by maintaining tight junctions between the intraepithelial cells, stimulating blood flow, and inducing the release of trophic endogenous agents (such as cholecystokinin, gastrin, bombesin, and bile salts). EN maintains structural integrity by maintaining villous height and supporting the mass of secretory IgA-producing immunocytes which comprise the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) and in turn contribute to mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) at distant sites such as the lungs, liver, and kidneys.4-7 Adverse change in gut permeability from loss of functional integrity is a dynamic phenomenon which is time-dependent (channels opening within hours of the major insult or injury). The consequences of the permeability changes include increased bacterial challenge (engagement of GALT with enteric organisms), risk for systemic infection, and greater likelihood of multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).4,5 As disease severity worsens, increases in gut permeability are amplified and the enteral route of feeding is more likely to favorably impact outcome parameters of infection, organ failure, and hospital length of stay (compared to the parenteral route).8 The specific reasons for providing early EN are to maintain gut integrity, modulate stress and the systemic immune response, and attenuate disease severity.6,8,9 Additional endpoints of EN therapy include use of the gut as a conduit for the delivery of immune-modulating agents and use of enteral formulations as an effective means for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Nutrition support therapy (also called “specialized” or“ artificial” nutrition therapy) refers to the provision of enteral tube feeding or parenteral nutrition. “Standard therapy” refers to a patient's own volitional intake without provision of specialized nutrition support therapy. The importance of promoting gut integrity with regard to patient outcome is being strengthened by clinical trials comparing critically ill patients fed by EN to those receiving standard (STD) therapy. In a recent meta-analysis10 in elective gastrointestinal surgery and surgical critical care, patients undergoing a major operation who were given early postoperative EN experienced significant reductions in infection (relative risk [RR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.98; P = .03), hospital length of stay (mean 0.84 days; range 0.36-1.33 days; P = .001), and a trend toward reduced anastomotic dehiscence (RR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.26-1.08; P = .08), when compared to similar patients receiving no nutrition support therapy.10-16 In a meta-analysis17 of patients undergoing surgery for complications of severe acute pancreatitis, those placed on EN 1 day postop showed a trend toward reduced mortality compared to controls randomized to STD therapy (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.06-1.09; P = .06).17-19 See Table 2 . 11-16,18,19 A3. EN is the preferred route of feeding over parenteral nutrition (PN) for the critically ill patient who requires nutrition support therapy. (Grade: B) Rationale. In the majority of critically ill patients, it is practical and safe to utilize EN instead of PN. The beneficial effects of EN when compared to PN are well documented in numerous prospective randomized controlled trials involving a variety of patient populations in critical illness, including trauma, burns, head injury, major surgery, and acute pancreatitis.8,20-22 While few studies have shown a differential effect on mortality, the most consistent outcome effect from EN is a reduction in infectious morbidity (generally pneumonia and central line infections in most patient populations, and specifically abdominal abscess in trauma patients).20 In many studies, further benefits are seen from significant reductions in hospital length of stay,21 cost of nutrition therapy,21 and even return of cognitive function (in head injury patients).23 All 6 meta-analyses that compared EN to PN showed significant reductions in infectious morbidity with use of EN.21,24-28 Noninfective complications (risk difference = 4.9; 95% CI 0.3-9.5; P =.04) and reduced hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.20 days; 95% CI 0.38-2.03; P = .004) were seen with use of EN compared to PN in 1 metaanalysis by Peter et al.28 Five of the meta-analyses showed no difference in mortality between the 2 routes of nutrition support therapy.21,24,26-28 One meta-analysis by Simpson and Doig25 showed a significantly lower mortality (RR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.97; P =.04) despite a significantly higher incidence of infectious complications (RR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.09-2.51; P =.02) with use of PN compared to EN.25 See Table 3 . 8,20,22,29-61 A4. Enteral feeding should be started early within the first 24-48 hours following admission. (Grade: C) The feedings should be advanced toward goal over the next 48-72 hours. (Grade: E) Rationale. Attaining access and initiating EN should be considered as soon as fluid resuscitation is completed and the patient is hemodynamically stable. A “window of opportunity” exists in the first 24-72 hours following admission or the onset of a hypermetabolic insult. Feedings started within this time frame (compared to feedings started after 72 hours) are associated with less gut permeability, diminished activation, and release of inflammatory cytokines (ie, tumor necrosis factor [TNF] and reduced systemic endotoxemia).21 One meta-analysis by Heyland et al showed a trend toward reduced infectious morbidity (RR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.36-1.22; P =.08) and mortality (RR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.25-1.08; P = .08),21 while a second by Marik and Zaloga showed significant reductions in infectious morbidity (RR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.66; P = .00006) and hospital length of stay (mean 2.2 days, 95% CI 0.81-3.63 days; P = .001) with early EN compared to delayed feedings.62 See Table 4 . 63-72 A5. In the setting of hemodynamic compromise (patients requiring significant hemodynamic support including high dose catecholamine agents, alone or in combination with large volume fluid or blood product resuscitation to maintain cellular perfusion), EN should be withheld until the patient is fully resuscitated and/or stable. (Grade: E) Rationale. At the height of critical illness, EN is being provided to patients who are prone to GI dysmotility, sepsis, and hypotension and thus are at increased risk for subclinical ischemia/reperfusion injury involving the intestinal microcirculation. Ischemic bowel is a rare complication of EN, occurring in <1% of cases.73,74 EN-related ischemic bowel has been reported most often in the past with use of surgical jejunostomy tubes. However, more recently, this complication has been described with use of nasojejunal tubes.75 EN intended to be infused into the small bowel should be withheld in patients who are hypotensive (mean arterial blood pressure <60 mm Hg), particularly if clinicians are initiating use of catecholamine agents (eg, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, epinephrine, dopamine) or escalating the dose of such agents to maintain hemodynamic stability. EN may be provided with caution to patients into either the stomach or small bowel on stable low doses of pressor agents,76 but any signs of intolerance (abdominal distention, increasing nasogastric tube output or gastric residual volumes, decreased passage of stool and flatus, hypoactive bowel sounds, increasing metabolic acidosis and/or base deficit) should be closely scrutinized as possible early signs of gut ischemia. A6. In the ICU patient population, neither the presence nor absence of bowel sounds nor evidence of passage of flatus and stool is required for the initiation of enteral feeding. (Grade: B) Rationale. The literature supports the concept that bowel sounds and evidence of bowel function (ie, passing flatus or stool) are not required for initiation of enteral feeding. GI dysfunction in the ICU setting occurs in 30%-70% of patients depending on the diagnosis, premorbid condition, ventilation mode, medications, and metabolic state.77 Proposed mechanisms of ICU and postoperative GI dysfunction can be separated into 3 general categories: mucosal barrier disruption, altered motility and atrophy of the mucosa, and reduced mass of GALT. Bowel sounds are only indicative of contractility and do not necessarily relate to mucosal integrity, barrier function, or absorptive capacity. Success at attaining nutrition goals within the first 72 hours ranges from 30% to 85%. When ICU enteral feeding protocols are followed, rates of GI tolerance in the range of 70%-85% can be achieved.76 Ten randomized clinical trials,63-72 the majority in surgical critically ill patients, have reported feasibility and safety of enteral feeding within the initial 36-48 hours of admission to the ICU. The grade of this recommendation is based on the strength of the literature supporting A3, where patients in the experimental arm of the above mentioned studies were successfully started on EN within the first 36 hours of admission (regardless of clinical signs of stooling, flatus, or borborygmi). See Table 4 . 63-72 A7. Either gastric or small bowel feeding is acceptable in the ICU setting. Critically ill patients should be fed via an enteral access tube placed in the small bowel if at high risk for aspiration or after showing intolerance to gastric feeding. (Grade: C) Withholding of enteral feeding for repeated high gastric residual volumes alone may be sufficient reason to switch to small bowel feeding (the definition for high gastric residual volume is likely to vary from one hospital to the next, as determined by individual institutional protocol). (Grade: E) (See guideline D4 for recommendations on gastric residual volumes, identifying high risk patients, and reducing chances for aspiration.) Rationale. Multiple studies have evaluated gastric vs jejunal feeding in various medical and surgical ICU settings. One level II study comparing gastric vs jejunal feeding showed significantly less gastroesophageal reflux with small bowel feeding.78 In a nonrandomized prospective study using a radioisotope in an enteral formulation, esophageal reflux was reduced significantly with a trend toward reduced aspiration as the level of infusion was moved from the stomach down through the third portion of the duodenum.79 Three meta-analyses have been published comparing gastric with post-pyloric feeding in the ICU setting.80-82 Only 1 of these meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia with post-pyloric feeding (RR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.99; P = .04),82 an effect heavily influenced by 1 study by Taylor et al.23 With removal of this study from the meta-analysis, the difference was no longer significant. The 2 other meta-analyses (which did not include the Taylor study) showed no difference in pneumonia between gastric and post-pyloric feeding.80,81 While 1 showed no difference in ICU length of stay,80 all 3 meta-analyses showed no significant difference in mortality between gastric and post-pyloric feeding.80-82 See Table 5 . 23,68,78,83-91 B1. If early EN is not feasible or available the first 7 days following admission to the ICU, no nutrition support therapy (ie, STD therapy) should be provided. (Grade: C) In the patient who was previously healthy prior to critical illness with no evidence of protein-calorie malnutrition, use of PN should be reserved and initiated only after the first 7 days of hospitalization EN is not (Grade: E) Rationale. These 2 recommendations are the most in these guidelines, are influenced primarily by 2 and should be in to patient meta-analyses compared use of PN with STD therapy no nutrition support therapy was In critically ill patients in the absence of EN is not et al 7 and showed that use of STD therapy was associated with significantly reduced infectious morbidity (RR = 95% CI P and a trend toward reduced overall complications (RR = 95% CI P not compared to use of In the circumstances ill, no EN and no evidence of Heyland et 4 and showed a significant in mortality with use of PN (RR = 95% CI P and a trend toward greater of complications (RR = 95% CI P not when compared to STD therapy. See Table 6 . With increased of severe illness, between STD therapy and PN become et al first showed that after the first days of hospitalization had to provide no nutrition therapy was associated with significantly greater mortality vs P and longer hospital length of stay days vs days, P when compared to use of The of as to the appropriate length of time initiating PN in a patient on STD therapy who has not to days, Heyland were reported in a study of patients with severe acute In this a significant was seen in each clinical outcome length of infection, overall complications, and when comparing patients randomized to STD therapy vs PN vs PN with parenteral of the to the of this study to of but were The final recommendation was based on the overall treatment effect of PN over the first of hospitalization seen in the 2 the literature PN for days, the Guidelines Committee that to provide STD therapy nutrition support therapy) 7 days to of nutrition status and an effect on clinical outcome. If is evidence of protein-calorie on admission and EN is not it is appropriate to PN as soon as possible following admission and (Grade: C) Rationale. In the where EN is not available and evidence of protein-calorie is defined by recent weight loss of or body weight of body initial are and use of PN has a more outcome STD therapy. See Table 6 . In the Heyland meta-analysis, use of PN in ICU patients was associated with significantly overall complications (RR = 0.52; 95% CI P STD In the meta-analysis, STD therapy in ICU patients was associated with significantly higher risk for mortality (RR = 95% CI P and a trend toward higher of infection (RR = 95% CI P not compared to use of these patients, when EN is not should be in initiating PN after admission to the ICU. If a patient is expected to major GI surgery and EN is not PN should be provided specific If the patient is PN should be initiated days and into the postoperative (Grade: B) PN should not be initiated in the postoperative but should be delayed for days EN not to be (Grade: B) PN therapy provided for a of days be expected to have no outcome effect and may in increased risk to the patient. PN should be initiated only if the of therapy is to be (Grade: B) Rationale. One population of patients that has shown more consistent benefit of PN over STD those patients undergoing major GI surgery or other major abdominal if is evidence of protein-calorie and the PN is provided specific critically ill patients in the Heyland meta-analysis experienced increased mortality with use of PN compared to STD therapy rationale for guideline surgical patients no treatment effect with PN mortality (RR = 95% CI P = Critically ill patients experienced a trend toward increased complications, while surgical patients significant reductions in complications with use of PN mortality (RR = 95% CI P These benefits were noted when PN was provided for a of days and through the In an meta-analysis by et comparing PN with STD therapy, only of provided PN for As a only 1 study showed a treatment and the overall meta-analysis showed no significant benefit from In a meta-analysis by et the from all of which provided PN for of the studies showed significant beneficial treatment effects from use of with the from the overall meta-analysis showing a significant decrease in infectious morbidity compared to STD See Table 6 . is to be that the beneficial effect of PN is if given only of from studies that evaluated postoperative showed a significant in complications compared to STD of the outcome effect from PN initiated in the postoperative et al PN for days following surgery if EN not to be The goal of EN by should be determined and at the time of initiation of nutrition support therapy. (Grade: C) requirements may be by or by should be used with as they provide a less of requirements in the individual patient. In the patient, the are even more without of (Grade: E) Rationale. should identify the goal of EN, as determined by requirements. Over have been published in the requirements may be either through published or the use of provided via infusion of should be considered when the nutrition While it is often to provide of goal by the enteral route, studies in which a was used to delivery of EN have shown that a volume of EN where the level of and protein provided is to goal This recommendation is supported by level II studies in which those patients who by a greater volume of EN experienced significantly complications and less infectious as well as hospital of and a trend toward lower those patients receiving lower to provide of goal should be made in to the clinical benefit of EN over the first of (Grade: C) Rationale. The impact of early EN on patient outcome to be a or trophic defined as may be sufficient to prevent mucosal atrophy but may be to the endpoints from EN therapy. that of goal may be required to prevent increases in intestinal permeability in and patients, to return of cognitive function in head injury patients, and to outcome from immune-modulating enteral formulations in critically ill This recommendation is supported by one level and one level where increases in the goal infused from a range of to clinical outcome. If unable to requirements of goal after days by the enteral route initiating PN. (Grade: E) PN prior to this day in the patient receiving EN does not outcome and may be to the patient. (Grade: C) Rationale. EN is toward maintaining gut integrity, reducing oxidative stress, and systemic In patients receiving some volume of EN, use of PN over the first days and to provide no In 1 small study in patients, EN with PN was associated with a significant in mortality vs P when compared to EN See Table 7 . As in guideline the time to PN in a patient who is receiving some volume of enteral feeding is not The by et al and et al that after the first days, the to provide and protein is increased in to prevent the consequences of of nutrition At this if the provision of EN is to the of PN should be assessment of adequacy of protein provision should be The use of protein is a as standard enteral formulations to have a high In patients with body mass protein requirements should be in the range of body weight and may likely be even higher in or (Grade: E) Rationale. In the critical care setting, protein to be the most for supporting immune function, and maintaining lean body most critically ill patients, protein requirements are higher requirements and are not by provision of enteral The to protein should be based on an assessment of adequacy of protein in the critical care setting, of protein requirements is

PRELIMINARY REMARKS (INTENT OF GUIDELINES) A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM are both nonprofit organizations composed of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. The mission of A.S.P.E.N. is to improve patient care by advancing the science and practice of clinical nutrition and metabolism. The mission of SCCM is to secure the highest quality care for all critically ill and injured patients. Guideline Limitations: These A.S.P.E.N.−SCCM Clinical Guidelines are based on general conclusions of health professionals who, in developing such guidelines, have balanced potential benefits to be derived from a particular mode of medical therapy against certain risks inherent with such therapy. However, practice guidelines are not intended as absolute requirements. The use of these practice guidelines does not in any way project or guarantee any specific benefit in outcome or survival. The judgment of the healthcare professional based on individual circumstances of the patient must always take precedence over the recommendations in these guidelines. The guidelines offer basic recommendations that are supported by review and analysis of the current literature, other national and international guidelines, and a blend of expert opinion and clinical practicality. The population of critically ill patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) is not homogeneous. Many of the studies on which the guidelines are based are limited by sample size, patient heterogeneity, variability in disease severity, lack of baseline nutritional status, and insufficient statistical power for analysis. Periodic Guideline Review and Update: This particular report is an update and expansion of guidelines published by A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM in 2009 (1). Governing bodies of both A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM have mandated that these guidelines be updated every three to five years. The database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that served as the platform for the analysis of the literature was assembled in a joint "harmonization process" with the Canadian Clinical Guidelines group. Once completed, each group operated separately in their interpretation of the studies and derivation of guideline recommendations (2). The current A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM guidelines included in this paper were derived from data obtained via literature searches by the authors through December 31, 2013. Although the committee was aware of landmark studies published after this date, these data were not included in this manuscript. The process by which the literature was evaluated necessitated a common end date for the search review. Adding a last-minute landmark trial would have introduced bias unless a formalized literature search was re-conducted for all sections of the manuscript. Target Patient Population for Guideline: The target of these guidelines is intended to be the adult (≥ 18 years) critically ill patient expected to require a length of stay (LOS) greater than 2 or 3 days in a medical ICU (MICU) or surgical ICU (SICU). The current guidelines were expanded to include a number of additional subsets of patients who met the above criteria, but were not included in the previous 2009 guidelines. Specific patient populations addressed by these expanded and updated guidelines include organ failure (pulmonary, renal, and liver), acute pancreatitis, surgical subsets (trauma, traumatic brain injury [TBI], open abdomen [OA], and burns), sepsis, postoperative major surgery, chronic critically ill, and critically ill obese. These guidelines are directed toward generalized patient populations but, like any other management strategy in the ICU, nutrition therapy should be tailored to the individual patient. Target Audience: The intended use of these guidelines is for all healthcare providers involved in nutrition therapy of the critically ill, primarily physicians, nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists. Methodology: The authors compiled clinical questions reflecting key management issues in nutrition therapy. A committee of multidisciplinary experts in clinical nutrition composed of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians was jointly convened by the two societies. Literature searches were then performed using key words (critically ill, critical care, intensive care, nutrition, enteral, parenteral, tube feeding, and those related to assigned topics such as pancreatitis, sepsis, etc.) to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting a response to those questions, which were then used to derive a subsequent treatment recommendation. The literature search included MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, the National Guidelines Clearing House and an Internet search using the Google search engine for scholarly articles through an end date of December 31, 2013 (including ePub publications). While preference was given to RCTs, other forms of resource material were used to support the response, including nonrandomized cohort trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective case series. Use of publications was limited to full-text articles available in English on adult humans. For all included RCTs, two readers completed data abstraction forms (DAFs) examining the data and assessing the quality of the research methodology to produce a shared evaluation achieved by consensus for each study (example of DAF provided in the supplemental data, Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/CCM/B571). DAFs were constructed only for RCTs. When the strongest available evidence was a published meta-analysis, the studies from the meta-analysis were used to determine the quality of the evidence and assessed by two evidence assessors. The data from included trials were entered into Review Manager 5.2 software to create forest plots aggregating the effect size for each intervention and outcome (3). The key forest plots supporting the recommendation are included throughout the text and in the supplement data (Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/CCM/B571). No new forest plots were created when a meta-analysis was evaluated. Since release of the 2009 A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM Clinical Guidelines, the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group have been adopted (4–7). A full description of the methodology has been previously published (4). The data from the Review Manager analysis was uploaded to GRADEPro software (8), where the body of evidence for a given intervention and outcome was evaluated for overall quality. One analyst created each GRADE table that was then independently confirmed by a second analyst. The GRADE tables are provided in the supplement data (Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/CCM/B571). Due to the inordinately large number of RCTs evaluated, observational studies were critically reviewed, but not utilized to construct the GRADE tables. However, in the few cases where observational studies were the only available evidence in a population, their quality of evidence was reviewed, using GRADE (Table 1). When no RCT or observational study was available to answer a question directly, consensus of the author group on the best clinical practice approach was used, and the recommendation was designated "based on expert consensus."TABLE 1: Type of EvidenceA recommendation for clinical practice was based on both the best available evidence and the risks and benefits to patients. While small author teams developed each recommendation and provided the supporting rationale, a full discussion by the entire author group followed, and every committee member was polled anonymously for their agreement with the recommendation. Achievement of consensus was arbitrarily set at 70% agreement of authors with a particular recommendation. Only one recommendation (H3a) did not meet this level of agreement, with a final consensus of 64%. All other consensus-based recommendations reached a level of agreement of 80% or higher. As with all A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM clinical guidelines, this manuscript was subjected to rigorous peer review by clinical content experts from all the practice disciplines that would use the guidelines, both internal and external to the organizations. A summary of the guidelines is presented in the supplement data (Supplemental Digital Content 1, https://links.lww.com/CCM/B571). A nutrition bundle based on the top guidelines (as voted on by the committee) for the bedside practitioner is presented in Table 2.TABLE 2: Bundle StatementsCONFLICT OF INTEREST All authors completed both an A.S.P.E.N. and SCCM conflict of interest form for copyright assignment and financial disclosure. There was no input or funding from industry, nor were any industry representatives present at any of the committee meetings. DEFINITIONS Nutrition Therapy refers specifically to the provision of either enteral nutrition (EN) by enteral access device and/or parenteral nutrition (PN) by central venous access. Standard therapy (STD) refers to provision of IV fluids, no EN or PN, and advancement to oral diet as tolerated. INTRODUCTION The significance of nutrition in the hospital setting (and especially the ICU) cannot be overstated. Critical illness is typically associated with a catabolic stress state in which patients demonstrate a systemic inflammatory response coupled with complications of increased infectious morbidity, multiple organ dysfunction, prolonged hospitalization, and disproportionate mortality. Over the past three decades, exponential advances have been made in the understanding of the molecular and biological effects of nutrients in maintaining homeostasis in the critically ill population. Traditionally, nutrition support in the critically ill population was regarded as adjunctive care designed to provide exogenous fuels to preserve lean body mass and support the patient throughout the stress response. Recently this strategy has evolved to represent nutrition therapy, in which the feeding is thought to help attenuate the metabolic response to stress, prevent oxidative cellular injury, and favorably modulate immune responses. Improvement in the clinical course of critical illness may be achieved by early EN, appropriate macro- and micronutrient delivery, and meticulous glycemic control. Delivering early nutrition support therapy, primarily by the enteral route, is seen as a proactive therapeutic strategy that may reduce disease severity, diminish complications, decrease LOS in the ICU, and favorably impact patient outcomes. A. NUTRITION ASSESSMENT Question: Does the use of a nutrition risk indicator identify patients who will most likely benefit from nutrition therapy? A1. Based on expert consensus, we suggest a determination of nutrition risk (for example, Nutritional Risk Score [NRS-2002], NUTRIC score) be performed on all patients admitted to the ICU for whom volitional intake is anticipated to be insufficient. High nutrition risk identifies those patients most likely to benefit from early EN therapy. Rationale: Poor outcomes have been associated with inflammation generated by critical illness that leads to deterioration of nutrition status and malnutrition (9). However, malnutrition in the critically ill has always been difficult to define. An international consensus group modified definitions to recognize the impact of inflammation. Objective measures of baseline nutrition status have been described by A.S.P.E.N. and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (10, 11). On the other hand, nutrition risk is easily defined and more readily determined by evaluation of baseline nutrition status and assessment of disease severity. All hospitalized patients are required to undergo an initial nutrition screen within 48 hours of admission. However, patients at higher nutrition risk in an ICU setting require a full nutrition assessment. Many screening and assessment tools are used to evaluate nutrition status, such as the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) (12). However, only the NRS-2002 and the NUTRIC score determine both nutrition status and disease severity. Although both scoring systems were based on retrospective analysis, they have been used to define nutrition risk in RCTs in critically ill patients (13–16). Patients at "risk" are defined by an NRS-2002 > 3 and those at "high risk" with a score ≥ 5; or a NUTRIC score ≥ 5 (if interleukin-6 is not included, otherwise ≥ 6) (13, 18). Interleukin-6 is rarely available as a component for the NUTRIC score; therefore, Heyland et al has shown a NUTRIC score ≥ 5 still indicates high nutrition risk (19). Two prospective nonrandomized studies show that patients at high nutrition risk are more likely to benefit from early EN with improved outcome (reduced nosocomial infection, total complications, and mortality) than patients at low nutrition risk (13, 18). While widespread use and supportive evidence is somewhat lacking to date, improvement in these scoring systems may increase their applicability in the future by providing guidance as to the role of EN and PN in the ICU. Question: What additional tools, components or surrogate markers provide useful information when performing nutrition assessments in critically ill adult patients? A2. Based on expert consensus, we suggest that nutritional assessment include an evaluation of comorbid conditions, function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and risk of aspiration. We suggest not using traditional nutrition indicators or surrogate markers, as they are not validated in critical care. Rationale: In the critical care setting, the traditional serum protein markers (albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, retinol-binding protein) are a reflection of the acute phase response (increases in vascular permeability and reprioritization of hepatic protein synthesis) and do not accurately represent nutrition status in the ICU setting (20). Anthropometrics are not reliable in assessment of nutrition status or adequacy of nutrition therapy (21). Individual levels of calcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL-6, and citrulline are still investigational and should not be used as surrogate markers. Ultrasound is emerging as a tool to expediently measure muscle mass and determine changes in muscle tissue at bedside in the ICU, given its ease of use and availability (22, 23). A CT scan provides a precise quantification of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue depots; however it is quite costly unless a scan taken for other purposes is used to determine body composition (24, 25). Both may be valuable future tools to incorporate into nutrition assessment; however, validation and reliability studies in ICU patients are still pending. Assessment of muscle function is still in its infancy. Its measurement, reproducibility, and applicability are still being validated for use in critically ill patients, and may be of value in the future. Question: What is the best method for determining energy needs in the critically ill adult patient? A3a. We suggest that indirect calorimetry (IC) be used to determine energy requirements, when available and in the absence of variables that affect the accuracy of measurement. [Quality of Evidence: Very Low] A3b. Based on expert consensus, in the absence of IC, we suggest that a published predictive equation or a simplistic weight-based equation (25–30 kcal/kg/day) be used to determine energy requirements. (See section Q for obesity recommendations.) Rationale: Clinicians should determine energy requirements in order to establish the goals of nutrition therapy. Energy requirements may be calculated either through simplistic formulas (25–30 kcal/kg/day), published predictive equations, or IC. The applicability of IC may be limited at most institutions by availability and cost. Variables in the ICU that affect the timing and accuracy of IC measurements include the presence of air leaks or chest tubes, supplemental oxygen (e.g., nasal cannula, bilevel positive airway pressure), ventilator settings (fractional inspiratory oxygen and positive end-expiratory pressure), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), anesthesia, physical therapy, and excessive movement (26). More than 200 predictive equations have been published in the literature, with accuracy rates ranging from 40–75% when compared to IC, and no single equation emerges as being more accurate in an ICU (27–32). Predictive equations are less accurate in obese and underweight patients (33–36). Equations derived from testing hospital patients (Penn State, Ireton-Jones, Swinamer) are no more accurate than equations derived from testing normal volunteers (Harris-Benedict, Mifflin St. Jeor) (37). The poor accuracy of predictive equations is related to many non-static variables affecting energy expenditure in the critically ill patient, such as weight, medications, treatments, and body temperature. The only advantage of using weight-based equations over other predictive equations is simplicity. However, in critically ill patients following aggressive volume resuscitation or in the presence of edema or anasarca, clinicians should use dry or usual body weight in these equations. Additional energy provided by dextrose-containing fluids and lipid-based medications such as propofol should be accounted for when deriving nutrition therapy regimens to meet target energy goals. Achieving energy balance as guided by IC measurements compared to predictive equations may lead to more appropriate nutrition intake. While two RCTs (38, 39) that met our inclusion criteria (with data from 161 patients) showed that higher mean intake of energy and protein were provided in IC-directed study patients compared to controls whose nutrition therapy was directed by predictive equations, issues with study design prevent a stronger recommendation for use of IC. In a study of burn patients, use of IC-directed nutrition therapy helped provide the minimal effective intake, avoiding the excesses of overfeeding seen in controls whose therapy was directed by the Curreri formula. Complications between groups (diarrhea and hyperglycemia) were no different, but traditional outcome parameters were not evaluated (38). A second study in general ICU patients used both EN and PN to meet target energy goals determined by IC measurement or a weight-based predictive equation (25 kcal/kg/day) (39). While the IC-directed energy goal was no different than the value obtained by predictive equation (1976 ± 468 vs 1838 ± 468 kcal/day, respectively, p = 0.60), only study patients were monitored vigilantly by an ICU dietitian, while controls were managed by standard of care (less frequent ICU dietitian monitoring), which led to significantly more energy and protein per in the study patients. The toward in study patients compared to controls = p = is difficult to in of their increased with to ICU LOS vs p = and of vs p = (38, by IC or by predictive equations, energy expenditure should be more than per and to energy and protein intake should be used Question: protein provision be monitored independently from energy provision in critically ill adult patients? Based on expert consensus, we suggest an evaluation of adequacy of protein provision be Rationale: In the critical care setting, protein to be the most for supporting immune and maintaining lean body For most critically ill patients, protein requirements are higher than energy requirements and are not easily met by provision of enteral have a high Patients with EN to frequent may benefit from protein The to protein should be based on an assessment of adequacy of protein intake. equations (e.g., may be used to adequacy of protein provision by the of protein to that especially when balance studies are not available to needs section protein markers (albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, are not validated for determining adequacy of protein provision and should not be used in the critical care setting in this EN Question: What is the benefit of early EN in critically ill adult patients compared to or this therapy? We that nutrition support therapy in the form of early EN be within hours in the critically ill patient who is to volitional intake. [Quality of Evidence: Very Low] Rationale: EN the of the by maintaining between the and the release of as and EN by maintaining and supporting the mass of and that the tissue and in to tissue at such as the and in permeability from of is a that is within hours of the major or The of the permeability changes include increased of with risk for systemic infection, and greater of multiple organ As disease in permeability are and the enteral of feeding is more likely to favorably impact outcome parameters of infection, organ and hospital LOS The specific for providing EN are to modulate stress and the systemic immune response, and attenuate disease Additional of EN therapy may include use of the as a for the of and use of enteral as an effective for stress previous data from RCTs early One meta-analysis of trials by Heyland showed a toward = p = when EN was within 48 hours compared to of EN after that A second meta-analysis of trials by showed in infectious = p = and hospital LOS p = when early EN was on within hours of ICU A meta-analysis of trials by showed a in = p = and = p = but no in multiple organ failure when early EN was within hours of to the ICU, compared to EN after that an updated meta-analysis of RCTs that met our inclusion criteria the provision of early EN EN, all on with on of early EN was associated with a in = p = and infectious = p = compared to early EN EN or 1: enteral nutrition (EN) vs EN, 2: enteral nutrition (EN) vs EN, infectious a in outcome between the use of EN or PN for adult critically ill patients? We suggest the use of EN over PN in critically ill patients who require nutrition support therapy. [Quality of Evidence: to Very Low] Rationale: In the of critically ill patients it is and to use EN of The effects of EN compared to PN are in RCTs a of patient populations in critical including injury, major surgery, and acute While few studies have shown a effect on the most outcome effect from EN is a in infectious and central in most patient and in patients) and ICU previous EN to PN showed in infectious with use of EN complications = p = and hospital LOS mean = p = were seen with use of EN compared to PN in one of the by of the showed no in between the two of nutrition support therapy One meta-analysis by showed a significantly = p = a significantly higher of infectious complications = p = with use of PN compared to EN In studies patients that met our inclusion criteria, on which was shown to be significantly less with EN than PN = p ICU LOS was with EN compared to PN by one full = to p = LOS and were not significantly These in outcome from the of feeding from studies and may diminish in the future with in glycemic medical management and new nutrition (EN) vs parenteral nutrition infectious the clinical evidence of required to EN in critically ill adult patients? Based on expert consensus, we suggest in the of and patient while should be evaluated when EN, of should not be required to of Rationale: The literature the that and evidence of or are not required for of in the ICU setting in of patients, on the medications, and metabolic state of ICU and postoperative are related to of the and mass of has been defined (e.g., absence or high etc.) and to in to of patients on are only of and do not to or The for EN of the of is based on studies of which critically ill surgical patients) the and of EN within the initial hours of to the ICU. or may greater disease and Patients with normal have been shown to have ICU than those with or vs vs ICU LOS has been shown to increase with greater number of of days when to days with of of EN is with a greater number of of A greater number of of may increased as EN is and may clinical Question: What is the level of of EN within the for critically ill patients? does the level of of EN affect patient We that the level of be in the in those critically ill patients at high risk for section or those who have shown to [Quality of Evidence: to Based on expert consensus we suggest in most critically ill patients, it is to EN in the Rationale: EN therapy in the is and may decrease the to of The of level of the of the feeding tube is in the different of the or or the within the may be determined by patient within ICU and of small enteral access and

To determine whether hyperinsulinemia can directly reduce serum sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels in obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome, six obese women with this disorder were studied. Before study, ovarian steroid production was suppressed in each woman by the administration of 7.5 mg of a long-acting GnRH agonist, leuprolide depot, im, on days -56, -28, and 0. This resulted in substantial reductions in serum concentrations of testosterone (from 1.72 +/- 0.29 nmol/L on day -56 to 0.32 +/- 0.09 nmol/L on day 0), non-SHBG-bound testosterone (from 104 +/- 16 pmol/L on day -56 to 19 +/- 5 pmol/L on day 0), androstenedione (from 7.25 +/- 1.65 nmol/L on day -56 to 2.78 +/- 0.94 nmol/L on day 0), estrone (from 371 +/- 71 pmol/L on day -56 to 156 +/- 29 pmol/L on day 0), estradiol (from 235 +/- 26 pmol/L on day -56 to 90 +/- 24 pmol/L on day 0), and progesterone (from 0.28 +/- 0.12 nmol/L on day -56 to 0.08 +/- 0.02 nmol/L on day 0). Serum SHBG levels, however, did not change (18.8 +/- 2.8 nmol/L on day -56 vs. 17.8 +/- 2.6 nmol/L on day 0). While continuing leuprolide treatment, the women were administered oral diazoxide (300 mg/day) for 10 days to suppress serum insulin levels. Diazoxide treatment resulted in suppressed insulin release during a 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (insulin area under the curve, 262 +/- 55 nmol/min.L on day 0 vs. 102 +/- 33 nmol/min.L on day 10; P less than 0.05) and deterioration of glucose tolerance. Serum testosterone, androstenedione, estrone, estradiol, and progesterone levels did not change during combined diazoxide and leuprolide treatment. In contrast, serum SHBG levels rose by 32% from 17.8 +/- 2.6 nmol/L on day 0 to 23.5 +/- 2.0 nmol/L on day 10 (P less than 0.003). Due primarily to the rise in serum SHBG levels, serum non-SHBG-bound testosterone levels fell by 43% from 19 +/- 5 pmol/L on day 0 to 11 +/- 4 pmol/L on day 10 (P = 0.05). These observations suggest that hyperinsulinemia directly reduces serum SHBG levels in obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome independently of any effect on serum sex steroids.

BACKGROUND: The acquisition of genital herpes during pregnancy has been associated with spontaneous abortion, prematurity, and congenital and neonatal herpes. The frequency of seroconversion, maternal symptoms of the disease, and the timing of its greatest effect on the outcome of pregnancy have not been systematically studied. METHODS: We studied 7046 pregnant women whom serologic tests showed to be at risk for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. Serum samples obtained at the first prenatal visit, at approximately 16 and 24 weeks, and during labor were tested for antibodies to HSV types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) by the Western blot assay, and the results were correlated with the occurrence of antenatal genital infections. RESULTS: Ninety-four of the women became seropositive for HSV; 34 of the 94 women (36 percent) had symptoms consistent with herpes infection. Women who were initially seronegative for both HSV-1 and HSV-2 had an estimated chance of seroconversion for either virus of 3.7 percent; those who were initially seropositive only for HSV-1 had an estimated chance of HSV-2 seroconversion of 1.7 percent; and those who were initially HSV-2-seropositive had an estimated chance of zero for acquiring HSV-1 infection. Among the 60 of the 94 pregnancies for which the time of acquisition of HSV infection was known, 30 percent of the infections occurred in the first trimester, 30 percent in the second, and 40 percent in the third. HSV seroconversion completed by the time of labor was not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity or with any cases of congenital herpes infection. However, among the infants born to nine women who acquired genital HSV infection shortly before labor, neonatal HSV infection occurred in four infants, of whom one died. CONCLUSIONS: Two percent or more of susceptible women acquire HSV infection during pregnancy. Acquisition of infection with seroconversion completed before labor does not appear to affect the outcome of pregnancy, but infection acquired near the time of labor is associated with neonatal herpes and perinatal morbidity.

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) production in humans has been thought to be stimulated by estrogens and thyroid hormone and inhibited by androgens. However, recent data indicate that SHBG production in vitro is stimulated by both androgens and estrogens. This study was designed to determine what other hormonal factors regulate SHBG production. Since hyperinsulinemia and hyperprolactinemia both occur in disease states in which low serum SHBG levels are found, the effects of insulin and PRL were compared to and/or studied in combination with estradiol (E2), T4, and testosterone (T) in a human hepatoma cell line (Hep G2). Hep G2 cells were grown to near confluence in medium including 10% fetal calf serum, and then 72-h experimental incubations were carried out which used only fetal calf serum-free medium. Compared to control incubations, both insulin (10(-8) mol/L) and PRL (10(-8) mol/L) decreased SHBG production from 65.0 +/- 0.6 (+/- SE) to 46.8 +/- 1.1 and 46.8 +/- 1.2 nmol/10(6) cells, respectively (P less than 0.01). Insulin also inhibited both E2 and T4-stimulated SHBG production. T stimulated SHBG production to the same degree as E2. Finally, both E2 and insulin significantly increased cell number, an important consideration when expressing the effect of a hormone on SHBG production in cultured cells. We conclude that insulin and PRL inhibit SHBG production and confirm that T4, T, and E2 stimulate SHBG production in vitro. These findings suggest that insulin and PRL may be important factors in the regulation of SHBG production in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Few investigations include both subjective and objective measurements of the effectiveness of treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee. Beneficial interventions may decrease the disability associated with osteoarthritis and the need for more invasive treatments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee, applied by experienced physical therapists with formal training in manual therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient physical therapy department of a large military medical center. PATIENTS: 83 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who were randomly assigned to receive treatment (n = 42; 15 men and 27 women [mean age, 60 +/- 11 years]) or placebo (n = 41; 19 men and 22 women [mean age, 62 +/- 10 years]). INTERVENTION: The treatment group received manual therapy, applied to the knee as well as to the lumbar spine, hip, and ankle as required, and performed a standardized knee exercise program in the clinic and at home. The placebo group had subtherapeutic ultrasound to the knee at an intensity of 0.1 W/cm2 with a 10% pulsed mode. Both groups were treated at the clinic twice weekly for 4 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Distance walked in 6 minutes and sum of the function, pain, and stiffness subscores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). A tester who was blinded to group assignment made group comparisons at the initial visit (before initiation of treatment), 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 1 year. RESULTS: Clinically and statistically significant improvements in 6-minute walk distance and WOMAC score at 4 weeks and 8 weeks were seen in the treatment group but not the placebo group. By 8 weeks, average 6-minute walk distances had improved by 13.1% and WOMAC scores had improved by 55.8% over baseline values in the treatment group (P < 0.05). After controlling for potential confounding variables, the average distance walked in 6 minutes at 8 weeks among patients in the treatment group was 170 m (95% CI, 71 to 270 m) more than that in the placebo group and the average WOMAC scores were 599 mm higher (95% CI, 197 to 1002 mm). At 1 year, patients in the treatment group had clinically and statistically significant gains over baseline WOMAC scores and walking distance; 20% of patients in the placebo group and 5% of patients in the treatment group had undergone knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of manual physical therapy and supervised exercise yields functional benefits for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and may delay or prevent the need for surgical intervention.

Serratia species, in particular Serratia marcescens, are significant human pathogens. S. marcescens has a long and interesting taxonomic, medical experimentation, military experimentation, and human clinical infection history. The organisms in this genus, particularly S. marcescens, were long thought to be nonpathogenic. Because S. marcescens was thought to be a nonpathogen and is usually red pigmented, the U.S. military conducted experiments that attempted to ascertain the spread of this organism released over large areas. In the process, members of both the public and the military were exposed to S. marcescens, and this was uncovered by the press in the 1970s, leading to U.S. congressional hearings. S. marcescens was found to be a certain human pathogen by the mid-1960s. S. marcescens and S. liquefaciens have been isolated as causative agents of numerous outbreaks and opportunistic infections, and the association of these organisms with point sources such as medical devices and various solutions given to hospitalized patients is striking. Serratia species appear to be common environmental organisms, and this helps to explain the large number of nosocomial infections due to these bacteria. Since many nosocomial infections are caused by multiply antibiotic-resistant strains of S. marcescens, this increases the danger to hospitalized patients, and hospital personnel should be vigilant in preventing nosocomial outbreaks due to this organism. S. marcescens, and probably other species in the genus, carries several antibiotic resistance determinants and is also capable of acquiring resistance genes. S. marcescens and S. liquefaciens are usually identified well in the clinical laboratory, but the other species are rare enough that laboratory technologists may not recognize them. 16S rRNA gene sequencing may enable better identification of some of the less common Serratia species.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in both civilian and military trauma patients. The HemCon chitosan-based hemostatic dressing is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for hemorrhage control. Animal data have shown the HemCon dressing to reduce hemorrhage and improve survival. The purpose of this article is to report preliminary results of the hemostatic efficacy of the HemCon dressing used in the prehospital setting on combat casualties. METHODS: A request for case information on use of HemCon dressings in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom was sent to deployed Special Forces combat medics, physicians, and physician assistants. RESULTS: Sixty-eight uses of the HemCon dressing were reported and reviewed by two US Army physicians. Four of the 68 cases were determined duplicative resulting in a total of 64 combat uses. Dressings were utilized externally on the chest, groin, buttock, and abdomen in 25 cases; on extremities in 35 cases; and on neck or facial wounds in 4 cases. In 66% of cases, dressings were utilized following gauze failure and were 100% successful. In 62 (97%) of the cases, the use of the HemCon dressing resulted in cessation of bleeding or improvement in hemostasis. There were two reported dressing failures that occurred with blind application of bandages up into large cavitational injuries. Dressings were reported to be most useful on areas where tourniquets could not be applied to control bleeding. The dressings were reported to be most difficult to use in extremity injuries where they could not be placed easily onto or into the wounds. No complications or adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This report on the field use of the HemCon dressing by medics suggests that it is a useful hemostatic dressing for prehospital combat casualties and supports further study to confirm efficacy.

BACKGROUND: To develop content validity of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure following current best scientific methodology to standardize assessment of influenza (flu) symptoms in clinical research. METHODS: Stage I (Concept Elicitation): 1:1 telephone interviews with influenza-positive adults (≥18 years) in the US and Mexico within 7 days of diagnosis. Participants described symptom type, character, severity, and duration. Content analysis identified themes and developed the draft Flu-PRO instrument. Stage II (Cognitive Interviewing): The Flu-PRO was administered to a unique set of influenza-positive adults within 14 days of diagnosis; telephone interviews addressed completeness, respondent interpretation of items and ease of use. RESULTS: Samples: Stage I: N = 46 adults (16 US, 30 Mexico); mean (SD) age: 38 (19), 39 (14) years; % female: 56%, 73%; race: 69% White, 97% Mestizo. Stage II: N = 34 adults (12 US, 22 Mexico); age: 37 (14), 39 (11) years; % female: 50%, 50%; race: 58% White, 100% Mestizo. SYMPTOMS: Symptoms identified by >50%: coughing, weak or tired, throat symptoms, congestion, headache, weakness, sweating, chills, general discomfort, runny nose, chest (trouble breathing), difficulty sleeping, and body aches or pains. No new content was uncovered during Stage II; participants easily understood the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Results show the 37-item Flu-PRO is a content valid measure of influenza symptoms in adults with a confirmed diagnosis of influenza. Research is underway to evaluate the suitability of the instrument for children and adolescents. This work can form the basis for future quantitative tests of reliability, validity, and responsiveness to evaluate the measurement properties of Flu-PRO for use in clinical trials and epidemiology studies.

PURPOSE: Donabedian's 1966 framework of structure, process, and outcome has guided three decades of study in the United States of the elements needed to evaluate and compare medical care quality. Donabedian's perspective was essentially linear, assuming that structures affect processes, which in turn affect outcomes. Patient characteristics are sometimes considered as mediating outcomes and clinical interventions are considered to be processes. A model is presented in the following article that relates multiple factors affecting quality of care to desired outcomes. It extends previous models by positing dynamic relationships with indicators that not only act upon, but reciprocally affect the various components. SCOPE AND SOURCES: The proposed model was derived from a synthesis of the authors' experience in quality of care practice and research, as well as selected previous theories. CONCLUSIONS: The quality health outcomes model is sufficiently broad (a) to guide development of databases for quality improvement and outcomes management, (b) to suggest key variables in clinical intervention research, and (c) to provide a framework for outcomes research and outcomes management that compares not only treatment options, but organizational or system level interventions. The model also has several policy implications.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Manual therapy and exercise have not previously been compared with a home exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between a home-based physical therapy program and a clinically based physical therapy program. SUBJECTS: One hundred thirty-four subjects with OA of the knee were randomly assigned to a clinic treatment group (n=66; 61% female, 39% male; mean age [+/-SD]=64+/-10 years) or a home exercise group (n=68, 71% female, 29% male; mean age [+/-SD]=62+/-9 years). METHODS: Subjects in the clinic treatment group received supervised exercise, individualized manual therapy, and a home exercise program over a 4-week period. Subjects in the home exercise group received the same home exercise program initially, reinforced at a clinic visit 2 weeks later. Measured outcomes were the distance walked in 6 minutes and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS: Both groups showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in 6-minute walk distances and WOMAC scores at 4 weeks; improvements were still evident in both groups at 8 weeks. By 4 weeks, WOMAC scores had improved by 52% in the clinic treatment group and by 26% in the home exercise group. Average 6-minute walk distances had improved about 10% in both groups. At 1 year, both groups were substantially and about equally improved over baseline measurements. Subjects in the clinic treatment group were less likely to be taking medications for their arthritis and were more satisfied with the overall outcome of their rehabilitative treatment compared with subjects in the home exercise group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although both groups improved by 1 month, subjects in the clinic treatment group achieved about twice as much improvement in WOMAC scores than subjects who performed similar unsupervised exercises at home. Equivalent maintenance of improvements at 1 year was presumably due to both groups continuing the identical home exercise program. The results indicate that a home exercise program for patients with OA of the knee provides important benefit. Adding a small number of additional clinical visits for the application of manual therapy and supervised exercise adds greater symptomatic relief.

BACKGROUND: Up to 9% of casualties killed in action during the Vietnam War died from exsanguination from extremity injuries. Retrospective reviews of prehospital tourniquet use in World War II and by the Israeli Defense Forces revealed improvements in extremity hemorrhage control and very few adverse limb outcomes when tourniquet times are less than 6 hours. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet use decreased hemorrhage from extremity injuries and saved lives, and was not associated with a substantial increase in adverse limb outcomes. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of the 31st combat support hospital for 1 year during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Inclusion criteria were any patient with a traumatic amputation, major extremity vascular injury, or documented prehospital tourniquet. RESULTS: Among 3,444 total admissions, 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven patients had prehospital tourniquets (TK); 98 patients had severe extremity injuries but no prehospital tourniquet (No TK). Extremity Acute Injury Scores were the same (3.5 TK vs. 3.4 No TK) in both groups. Differences (p < 0.05) were noted in the numbers of patients with arm injuries (16.2% TK vs. 30.6% No TK), injuries requiring vascular reconstruction (29.9% TK vs. 52.5% No TK), traumatic amputations (41.8% TK vs. 26.3% No TK), and in those patients with adequate bleeding control on arrival (83% TK vs. 60% No TK). Secondary amputation rates (4 (6.0%) TK vs. 9 (9.1%) No TK); and mortality (3 (4.4%) TK vs. 4 (4.1%) No TK) did not differ. Tourniquet use was not deemed responsible for subsequent amputation in severely mangled extremities. Analysis revealed that four of seven deaths were potentially preventable with functional prehospital tourniquet placement. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital tourniquet use was associated with improved hemorrhage control, particularly in the worse injured (Injury Severity Score >15) subset of patients. Fifty-seven percent of the deaths might have been prevented by earlier tourniquet use. There were no early adverse outcomes related to tourniquet use.

We examined the frequency of acquisition of bacterial pathogens on investigators' hands after contacting environmental surfaces near hospitalized patients. Hand imprint cultures were positive for one or more pathogens after contacting surfaces near 34 (53%) of 64 study patients, with Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus being the most common isolates.

CONTEXT: The effects of war-zone deployment on neuropsychological health remain poorly understood. Neuropsychological performance deficits serve as sensitive measures of neural dysfunction and are often associated with psychosocial and occupational problems. Previous studies have not conducted objective neuropsychological assessments both before and after a major war-zone deployment. OBJECTIVE: To examine objective neuropsychological outcomes of Iraq War deployment in a large military cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Neurocognition Deployment Health Study, a prospective, cohort-controlled study conducted at military installations. This report centers on 961 male and female active-duty Army soldiers drawn from the larger cohort. Deploying Army soldiers (n = 654) were examined prior to deployment to Iraq (April-December 2003) and shortly after return (within a mean of 73 days [median, 75 days]; January-May 2005) from Iraq deployment. A comparison group of soldiers (n = 307) similar in military characteristics but not deploying overseas during the study was assessed in sessions timed to be as close as possible to the assessment of deployers. Military unit sampling procedures facilitated representation of combat, combat support, and combat service support functions among both deployers and nondeployers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individually administered, performance-based neuropsychological tasks. Estimates (beta; the unstandardized parameter estimate) for the absolute differences in adjusted mean outcome scores between deployed and nondeployed groups were determined using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses adjusted for battalion membership revealed that Iraq deployment, compared with nondeployment, was associated with neuropsychological compromise on tasks of sustained attention (beta = 0.11; P<.001), verbal learning (beta = -1.51; P = .003), and visual-spatial memory (beta = -3.82; P<.001). Iraq deployment was also associated with increased negative state affect on measures of confusion (beta = 1.40; P<.001) and tension (beta = 1.24; P<.001). In contrast, deployment was associated with improved simple reaction time (beta = 4.30; P = .003). Deployment effects remained statistically significant after taking into account deployment-related head injury and stress and depression symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Deployment to Iraq is associated with increased risk of neuropsychological compromise. Findings point to the need to investigate further the impact of deployment on neural functioning. Public health implications include consideration of neuropsychological compromise in health prevention and postdeployment clinical and occupational management.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. It is the fourth most common cancer in women in the United States after breast, lung, and colorectal cancers. Risk factors are related to excessive unopposed exposure of the endometrium to estrogen, including unopposed estrogen therapy, early menarche, late menopause, tamoxifen therapy, nulliparity, infertility or failure to ovulate, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Additional risk factors are increasing age, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The most common presentation for endometrial cancer is postmenopausal bleeding. The American Cancer Society recommends that all women older than 65 years be informed of the risks and symptoms of endometrial cancer and advised to seek evaluation if symptoms occur. There is no evidence to support endometrial cancer screening in asymptomatic women. Evaluation of a patient with suspected disease should include a pregnancy test in women of childbearing age, complete blood count, and prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time if bleeding is heavy. Most guidelines recommend either transvaginal ultrasonography or endometrial biopsy as the initial study. The mainstay of treatment for endometrial cancer is total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Radiation and chemotherapy can also play a role in treatment. Low- to medium-risk endometrial hyperplasia can be treated with nonsurgical options. Survival is generally defined by the stage of the disease and histology, with most patients at stage I and II having a favorable prognosis. Controlling risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension could play a role in the prevention of endometrial cancer.

Autism has been described in association with a variety of medical and genetic conditions. We previously reported on a patient whose clinical phenotype was compatible with both fetal valproate syndrome (FVS) and autism. Here we present five additional patients with FVS and autism. In all five of our patients, there was evidence of cognitive deficits, manifestations of autism, and typical phenotypic characteristics of FVS. The association between this known teratogen and autism has both clinical and research implications.

OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a 15-week randomized controlled trial of the alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist prazosin for combat trauma nightmares, sleep quality, global function, and overall symptoms in active-duty soldiers with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) returned from combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. METHOD: Sixty-seven soldiers were randomly assigned to treatment with prazosin or placebo for 15 weeks. Drug was titrated based on nightmare response over 6 weeks to a possible maximum dose of 5 mg midmorning and 20 mg at bedtime for men and 2 mg midmorning and 10 mg at bedtime for women. Mean achieved bedtime doses were 15.6 mg of prazosin (SD=6.0) and 18.8 mg of placebo (SD=3.3) for men and 7.0 mg of prazosin (SD=3.5) and 10.0 mg of placebo (SD=0.0) for women. Mean achieved midmorning doses were 4.0 mg of prazosin (SD=1.4) and 4.8 mg of placebo (SD=0.8) for men and 1.7 mg of prazosin (SD=0.5) and 2.0 mg of placebo (SD=0.0) mg for women. Primary outcome measures were the nightmare item of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the change item of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale anchored to functioning. Secondary outcome measures were the 17-item CAPS, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Quality of Life Index. Maintenance psychotropic medications and supportive psychotherapy were held constant. RESULTS: Prazosin was effective for trauma nightmares, sleep quality, global function, CAPS score, and the CAPS hyperarousal symptom cluster. Prazosin was well tolerated, and blood pressure changes did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prazosin is effective for combat-related PTSD with trauma nightmares in active-duty soldiers, and benefits are clinically meaningful. Substantial residual symptoms suggest that studies combining prazosin with effective psychotherapies might demonstrate further benefit.

Many Mendelian traits are likely unrecognized owing to absence of traditional segregation patterns in families due to causation by de novo mutations, incomplete penetrance, and/or variable expressivity. Genome-level sequencing can overcome these complications. Extreme childhood phenotypes are promising candidates for new Mendelian traits. One example is early onset hypertension, a rare form of a global cause of morbidity and mortality. We performed exome sequencing of 40 unrelated subjects with hypertension due to primary aldosteronism by age 10. Five subjects (12.5%) shared the identical, previously unidentified, heterozygous CACNA1H(M1549V) mutation. Two mutations were demonstrated to be de novo events, and all mutations occurred independently. CACNA1H encodes a voltage-gated calcium channel (CaV3.2) expressed in adrenal glomerulosa. CACNA1H(M1549V) showed drastically impaired channel inactivation and activation at more hyperpolarized potentials, producing increased intracellular Ca(2+), the signal for aldosterone production. This mutation explains disease pathogenesis and provides new insight into mechanisms mediating aldosterone production and hypertension.

To test the hypothesis that insulin plays a role in the hyperandrogenism of obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome, we conducted a prospective study in which the androgen status of five obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome was assessed on two occasions: before and after 10 days of oral diazoxide (100 mg, three times daily) administration. Fasting serum insulin levels decreased from 177 +/- 45 (+/- SE) to 123 +/- 43 pmol/L (P less than 0.01) and insulin release in response to 100 g oral glucose administration decreased from 223.0 +/- 29.2 to 55.6 +/- 7.9 nmol.min/L (P less than 0.002) after diazoxide administration. At the same time, serum total testosterone fell from 2.5 +/- 0.4 to 2.1 +/- 0.3 nmol/L (P less than 0.007), serum testosterone not bound to sex hormone-binding globulin fell from 1.9 +/- 0.3 to 1.4 +/- 0.2 nmol/L (P less than 0.01), and the molar ratio of serum androstenedione to serum estrone fell from 25.7 +/- 7.7 to 16.6 +/- 5.5 (P less than 0.04). Serum sex hormone-binding globulin levels increased slightly but not significantly from 13.2 +/- 1.0 to 21.7 +/- 4.1 nmol/L. Serum androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol, estrone, and progesterone concentrations did not change, nor did basal or GnRH-stimulated serum LH and FSH concentrations. These results suggest that hyperinsulinemia in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome may directly increase serum testosterone levels.