Stiftung Charité

An estimated 14.1 million patients survive sepsis each year. Many survivors experience poor long-term outcomes, including new or worsened neuropsychological impairment; physical disability; and vulnerability to further health deterioration, including recurrent infection, cardiovascular events, and acute renal failure. However, clinical trials and guidelines have focused on shorter-term survival, so there are few data on promoting longer-term recovery. To address this unmet need, the International Sepsis Forum convened a colloquium in February 2018 titled "Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship." The goals were to identify gaps and limitations of current research and shorter- and longer-term priorities for understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Twenty-six experts from eight countries participated. The top short-term priorities identified by nominal group technique culminating in formal voting were to better leverage existing databases for research, develop and disseminate educational resources on postsepsis morbidity, and partner with sepsis survivors to define and achieve research priorities. The top longer-term priorities were to study mechanisms of long-term morbidity through large cohort studies with deep phenotyping, build a harmonized global sepsis registry to facilitate enrollment in cohorts and trials, and complete detailed longitudinal follow-up to characterize the diversity of recovery experiences. This perspective reviews colloquium discussions, the identified priorities, and current initiatives to address them.

Importance: Despite the large health burden, reliable data on sepsis epidemiology are lacking; studies using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-coded hospital discharge diagnosis for sepsis identification suffer from limited sensitivity. Also, ICD data do not allow investigation of underlying pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. Objectives: To generate reliable epidemiological estimates by linking data from a population-based database to a reference standard of clinical medical record review. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using a population-based administrative database including all acute care hospitals of the Scania region in Sweden in 2019 and 2020 to identify hospital-treated sepsis cases by ICD codes. From this database, clinical medical records were also selected for review within 6 strata defined by ICD discharge diagnosis (both with and without sepsis diagnosis). Data were analyzed from April to October 2022. Main outcomes and measures: Hospital and population incidences of sepsis, case fatality, antimicrobial resistance, and temporal dynamics due to COVID-19 were assessed, as well as validity of ICD-10 case identification methods compared with the reference standard of clinical medical record review. Results: Out of 295 531 hospitalizations in 2019 in the Scania region of Sweden, 997 patient medical records were reviewed, among which 457 had sepsis according to clinical criteria. Of the patients with clinical sepsis, 232 (51%) were female, and 357 (78%) had at least 1 comorbidity. The median (IQR) age of the cohort was 76 (67-85) years. The incidence of sepsis in hospitalized patients according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria in 2019 was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.6-4.5) by medical record review. This corresponds to an annual incidence rate of 747 (95% CI, 663-832) patients with sepsis per 100 000 population. No significant increase in sepsis during the COVID-19 pandemic nor a decrease in sepsis incidence when excluding COVID-19 sepsis was observed. Few sepsis cases caused by pathogens with antimicrobial resistance were found. The validity of ICD-10-based case identification in administrative data was low. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of sepsis epidemiology, sepsis was a considerable burden to public health in Sweden. Supplying administrative data with information from clinical medical records can help to generate reliable data on sepsis epidemiology.

PURPOSE: Timely and accurate data on the epidemiology of sepsis are essential to inform policy decisions and research priorities. We aimed to investigate the validity of inpatient administrative health data (IAHD) for surveillance and quality assurance of sepsis care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective validation study in a disproportional stratified random sample of 10,334 inpatient cases of age ≥ 15 years treated in 2015-2017 in ten German hospitals. The accuracy of coding of sepsis and risk factors for mortality in IAHD was assessed compared to reference standard diagnoses obtained by a chart review. Hospital-level risk-adjusted mortality of sepsis as calculated from IAHD information was compared to mortality calculated from chart review information. RESULTS: ICD-coding of sepsis in IAHD showed high positive predictive value (76.9-85.7% depending on sepsis definition), but low sensitivity (26.8-38%), which led to an underestimation of sepsis incidence (1.4% vs. 3.3% for severe sepsis-1). Not naming sepsis in the chart was strongly associated with under-coding of sepsis. The frequency of correctly naming sepsis and ICD-coding of sepsis varied strongly between hospitals (range of sensitivity of naming: 29-71.7%, of ICD-diagnosis: 10.7-58.5%). Risk-adjusted mortality of sepsis per hospital calculated from coding in IAHD showed no substantial correlation to reference standard risk-adjusted mortality (r = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Due to the under-coding of sepsis in IAHD, previous epidemiological studies underestimated the burden of sepsis in Germany. There is a large variability between hospitals in accuracy of diagnosing and coding of sepsis. Therefore, IAHD alone is not suited to assess quality of sepsis care.

Purpose: To investigate the rate and localization of graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Methods: Sixty-six consecutive cases operated between June and August 2014 at the Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin were examined prospectively 1 week postoperatively. A single masked observer analyzed the rate and localization of graft detachment using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the rebubbling rate was measured. Localization of graft detachment was correlated to the incision approach. Preoperative data were correlated to the rate of graft detachment and rebubbling. Results: Graft detachment occurred in more than 2 clock hours and with postoperative corneal edema in 33.3% and required rebubbling. In 33.3%, graft detachment occurred in more than 2 clock hours and with postoperative corneal edema and required rebubbling. The mean graft detachment rate was 8.3% per clock hour. A significantly higher graft detachment rate was noted in the inferior clock hours (21.1%, P < 0.0001, 16.7%, P = 0.003). Only higher age of the patient correlated to a higher rate of graft detachment (P = 0.022). No correlation was found between localization of graft detachment and the incision approach (P = 0.615). Conclusions: The graft detachment rate is high after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, but detachment is usually peripheral, partial and mainly inferior and involves only a few clock hours. Only higher age of the patient is strongly associated with a higher rate of graft detachment. The incision approach is not significantly correlated with the localization of graft detachment. Therefore, the postoperative supine position of the patient seems to be of major importance. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02020044.

<b>Hintergrund:</b> Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war, den Einfluss der Vorderkammertiefe (VKT) auf die Vermessung des Sehnervenkopfs mit OCT und HRT 3 zu untersuchen. <b>Patienten und Methoden:</b> 100 pseudophake Augen von 100 Patienten wurden in diese prospektive Studie eingeschlossen. Die Vermessung des Sehnervenkopfs wurde mit der optischen Kohärenztomografie (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA) und der konfokalen Laser-Scanning-Tomografie (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, HRT 3; Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Dossenheim, Deutschland) durchgeführt. Bland-Altman-Diagramme wurden genutzt, um die Übereinstimmung zwischen den Messparametern der beiden Techniken zu untersuchen. Das Verhältnis zwischen der Sehnervenkopfgröße und der VKT wurde mit der linearen Regression analysiert. <b>Ergebnisse:</b> Die Messwerte der Papillenfläche mit dem OCT und dem HRT 3 zeigten keinen signifikanten Unterschied (p = 0,638). Die Messung der Papillenfläche mit dem OCT korrelierte signifikant mit der VKT (r = − 0,234, p = 0,016). Hierbei nahm die Papillenfläche mit steigenden Werten der VKT ab. Beim HRT 3 zeigte sich kein Einfluss der VKT auf die Messung der Papillenfläche (r = 0,128, p = 0,193). <b>Schlussfolgerungen:</b> Während die Papillenfläche gemessen mit dem OCT mit steigender VKT abnahm, zeigte sich die Messung mit dem HRT 3 im weitesten Sinne unabhängig von der VKT. Das OCT kann die Papillenfläche bei tieferer VKT unterschätzen. Dies kann zu einer reduzierten Übereinstimmung in den Messergebnissen zwischen den beiden Geräten führen.