Temple Street Children's University Hospital

Transfusion-dependent -thalassemia (TDT) and sickle cell disease (SCD) are severe monogenic diseases with severe and potentially life-threatening manifestations. BCL11A is a transcription factor that represses -globin expression and fetal hemoglobin in erythroid cells. We performed electroporation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells obtained from healthy donors, with CRISPR-Cas9 targeting the BCL11A erythroid-specific enhancer. Approximately 80% of the alleles at this locus were modified, with no evidence of off-target editing. After undergoing myeloablation, two patients -one with TDT and the other with SCD -received autologous CD34+ cells edited with CRISPR-Cas9 targeting the same BCL11A enhancer. More than a year later, both patients had high levels of allelic editing in bone marrow and blood, increases in fetal hemoglobin that were distributed pancellularly, transfusion independence, and (in the patient with SCD) elimination of vaso-occlusive episodes. (Funded by CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03655678 for CLIMB THAL-111 and NCT03745287 for CLIMB SCD-121.) 2] Mutations in HBB that cause TDT 4 result in reduced ( + ) or absent ( 0 ) -globin synthesis and an imbalance between the -like and -like globin (e.g., , , and ) chains of hemoglobin, which causes ineffective erythropoiesis. Sickle hemoglobin is the result of a point mutation in HBB that replaces glutamic acid with valine at amino acid position 6. Polymerization of deoxygenated sickle hemoglobin causes erythrocyte deformation, hemolysis, anemia, painful vaso-occlusive episodes, irreversible end-organ damage, and a reduced life expectancy. reatment options primarily consist of transfusion and iron chelation in patients with TDT 7 and pain management, transfusion, and hydroxyurea in those with SCD. 8 Recently approved therapies, including luspatercept 9 and crizanlizumab, 10 have reduced transfusion requirements in patients with TDT and the incidence of vaso-occlusive episodes in those with SCD, respectively, but neither treatment addresses the underlying cause of the disease nor fully ameliorates disease manifestations. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation can cure both TDT and

We collated data from 157 unpublished cases of pediatric high-grade glioma and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and 20 publicly available datasets in an integrated analysis of >1,000 cases. We identified co-segregating mutations in histone-mutant subgroups including loss of FBXW7 in H3.3G34R/V, TOP3A rearrangements in H3.3K27M, and BCOR mutations in H3.1K27M. Histone wild-type subgroups are refined by the presence of key oncogenic events or methylation profiles more closely resembling lower-grade tumors. Genomic aberrations increase with age, highlighting the infant population as biologically and clinically distinct. Uncommon pathway dysregulation is seen in small subsets of tumors, further defining the molecular diversity of the disease, opening up avenues for biological study and providing a basis for functionally defined future treatment stratification.

Purpose: We provide a standardized set of terminology, definitions, and thresholds of myopia and its main ocular complications. Methods: Critical review of current terminology and choice of myopia thresholds was done to ensure that the proposed standards are appropriate for clinical research purposes, relevant to the underlying biology of myopia, acceptable to researchers in the field, and useful for developing health policy. Results: We recommend that the many descriptive terms of myopia be consolidated into the following descriptive categories: myopia, secondary myopia, axial myopia, and refractive myopia. To provide a framework for research into myopia prevention, the condition of "pre-myopia" is defined. As a quantitative trait, we recommend that myopia be divided into myopia (i.e., all myopia), low myopia, and high myopia. The current consensus threshold value for myopia is a spherical equivalent refractive error ≤ -0.50 diopters (D), but this carries significant risks of classification bias. The current consensus threshold value for high myopia is a spherical equivalent refractive error ≤ -6.00 D. "Pathologic myopia" is proposed as the categorical term for the adverse, structural complications of myopia. A clinical classification is proposed to encompass the scope of such structural complications. Conclusions: Standardized definitions and consistent choice of thresholds are essential elements of evidence-based medicine. It is hoped that these proposals, or derivations from them, will facilitate rigorous, evidence-based approaches to the study and management of myopia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of atopic diseases is on the rise. Traditional lifestyles may be associated with a reduced risk of atopy. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that children living on a farm have lower prevalences of atopic diseases. To identify differences in living conditions between farmers and other families which are associated with the development of atopic conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey among children entering school (aged 5-7 years). A written questionnaire including the ISAAC core questions and asking for exposures on a farm and elsewhere was administered to the parents. SETTING: School health entry examination in two Bavarian districts with extensive farming activity. SUBJECTS: 10 163 children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of doctor's diagnoses and symptoms of hay fever, asthma and eczema as assessed by parental report. RESULTS: Farmers' children had lower prevalences of hay fever (adjusted odds ratio = 0. 52, 95% CI 0.28-0.99), asthma (0.65, 0.39-1.09), and wheeze (0.55, 0. 36-0.86) than their peers not living in an agricultural environment. The reduction in risk was stronger for children whose families were running the farm on a full-time basis as compared with families with part-time farming activity. Among farmers' children increasing exposure to livestock was related to a decreasing prevalence of atopic diseases (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Factors related to environmental influences on a farm such as increased exposure to bacterial compounds in stables where livestock is kept prevent the development of allergic disorders in children.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of rickets is one of the oldest and most effective prophylactic measures in medicine, having virtually eradicated rickets in North America. Given the potentially toxic effects of vitamin D, the recommendations for the optimal dose are still debated, in part owing to the increased incidence of idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia in Britain in the 1950s during a period of high vitamin D supplementation in fortified milk products. We investigated the molecular basis of idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia, which is characterized by severe hypercalcemia, failure to thrive, vomiting, dehydration, and nephrocalcinosis. METHODS: We used a candidate-gene approach in a cohort of familial cases of typical idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia with suspected autosomal recessive inheritance. Identified mutations in the vitamin D-metabolizing enzyme CYP24A1 were evaluated with the use of a mammalian expression system. RESULTS: Sequence analysis of CYP24A1, which encodes 25-hydroxyvitamin D 24-hydroxylase, the key enzyme of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) degradation, revealed recessive mutations in six affected children. In addition, CYP24A1 mutations were identified in a second cohort of infants in whom severe hypercalcemia had developed after bolus prophylaxis with vitamin D. Functional characterization revealed a complete loss of function in all CYP24A1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CYP24A1 mutations explains the increased sensitivity to vitamin D in patients with idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia and is a genetic risk factor for the development of symptomatic hypercalcemia that may be triggered by vitamin D prophylaxis in otherwise apparently healthy infants.

Aicardi-Goutières syndrome is an inflammatory disease occurring due to mutations in any of TREX1, RNASEH2A, RNASEH2B, RNASEH2C, SAMHD1, ADAR or IFIH1. We report on 374 patients from 299 families with mutations in these seven genes. Most patients conformed to one of two fairly stereotyped clinical profiles; either exhibiting an in utero disease-onset (74 patients; 22.8% of all patients where data were available), or a post-natal presentation, usually within the first year of life (223 patients; 68.6%), characterized by a sub-acute encephalopathy and a loss of previously acquired skills. Other clinically distinct phenotypes were also observed; particularly, bilateral striatal necrosis (13 patients; 3.6%) and non-syndromic spastic paraparesis (12 patients; 3.4%). We recorded 69 deaths (19.3% of patients with follow-up data). Of 285 patients for whom data were available, 210 (73.7%) were profoundly disabled, with no useful motor, speech and intellectual function. Chilblains, glaucoma, hypothyroidism, cardiomyopathy, intracerebral vasculitis, peripheral neuropathy, bowel inflammation and systemic lupus erythematosus were seen frequently enough to be confirmed as real associations with the Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome phenotype. We observed a robust relationship between mutations in all seven genes with increased type I interferon activity in cerebrospinal fluid and serum, and the increased expression of interferon-stimulated gene transcripts in peripheral blood. We recorded a positive correlation between the level of cerebrospinal fluid interferon activity assayed within one year of disease presentation and the degree of subsequent disability. Interferon-stimulated gene transcripts remained high in most patients, indicating an ongoing disease process. On the basis of substantial morbidity and mortality, our data highlight the urgent need to define coherent treatment strategies for the phenotypes associated with mutations in the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome-related genes. Our findings also make it clear that a window of therapeutic opportunity exists relevant to the majority of affected patients and indicate that the assessment of type I interferon activity might serve as a useful biomarker in future clinical trials.

With the American Medical Association's recent declaration that obesity is a serious disease [1], a critical consideration of the ethics of treating childhood obesity is especially timely. Although data suggest that the childhood obesity epidemic has stabilized in some countries [2], the levels remain too high; 18-49% of European children are overweight [3]. Consequently there is an immense and urgent need for the effective treatment of this complex disease. Unfortunately, the most recent Cochrane review concludes that, although family-based interventions can reduce excess weight in children and adolescents, long-term, effective and sustainable interventions for childhood obesity have yet to be identified [4]. Childhood obesity is a complex disease caused by a multitude of factors and it is associated with a wide range of co-morbidities. This complexity makes it challenging to design interventions and test the treatment approaches - particularly with regard to which outcome(s) should be used as the criteria for success. Most childhood obesity treatments occur in healthcare settings. As such, the randomized controlled trial (RCT), which is the ‘gold standard' of the medical/clinical research tradition, has been used to evaluate whether a given obesity treatment protocol is safe and effective. It is questionable however, if the RCT is the optimal study design to address this complex issue.Researchers investigating childhood obesity treatments face difficulties in deciding which outcomes best reflect the impact of treatment and, if a RCT is conducted, what type of treatment should it be randomized against. In light of the widespread childhood obesity epidemic, this paper will explore the ethical implications of these issues. Pediatric obesity research is conducted in a vulnerable group of patients and families. Many children who are obese suffer from significant psychological problems including anxiety, depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity as well as emotional and eating disorders [5,6]. Added to this, obesity carries a social stigma that adversely affects children as well as their families. There has been - and still is - considerable debate as to who bears the responsibility for the development of excess weight in the child and who bears the responsibility for alleviating the condition at the individual and the societal levels [7,8]. In recognition of these issues, there are discussions surrounding the ethics of community-based approaches of treating childhood obesity [9] and about mechanistic clinical studies aimed at understanding the pathophysiology of morbid obesity in children without a direct aim of reducing weight or the degree of obesity [10]. Less attention, however, has been given to the ethics of studying the individual treatment of the condition.The vast majority of childhood obesity therapy research is conducted at hospitals and their associated clinics or at universities. In this framework, treatment protocols are examined and approved by ethical review committees; thus it can be assumed that the basic premises of these studies are ethically acceptable. Nonetheless, investigators are obliged to ensure that their research fulfils the four basic principles of ethical research: respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice [11]. In the context of childhood obesity research, this can be challenging. Children who are obese and their families are often desperate for treatment because existing programs can have long waiting lists or be out of reach due to cost, time, and transportation factors.Given these circumstances, investigators must carefully consider if their protocol provides a situation in which they can scientifically test their hypotheses and balance this with creating a situation in which children and families freely make the choice to enter the study (autonomy), that the child receives a net benefit through participation in a timely manner (beneficence and non-maleficence), and that the exclusion criteria for participation are reasonable (justice). With these principles in mind, it becomes apparent that the development of treatment protocols must recognize the need for effective treatment along with consideration for the well-being of the child and his or her parent(s). The majority of childhood obesity treatments use the reduction of weight, BMI (kg/m2), waist circumference, and/or body composition as the primary outcome. These studies usually evaluate the change over a period of a few months to a maximum of a couple of years. Although weight loss or stabilization represents a reasonable target, it may be overly simplistic since childhood obesity is a complex phenotype that is associated with multiple concurrent co-morbidities. Clinical studies suggest that almost 50% of children who are obese exhibit pre- or grade 1 or 2 hypertension [12,13], another 29% have dyslipidemia [14], 44% have more than 5% fat in their livers [15], and 74% exhibit more than 5% fat in their muscles [16]. Additionally, children who are obese are at risk of serious cardiovascular [17,18], endocrinological [17,19], orthopedic [20,21] and psychological [5,6] complications that are present or not yet clinically apparent. Other complications progress silently and appear during late adolescence and young adulthood. Furthermore, future health risks loom, and a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease [22], metabolic disease [23], and cancer [24,25] is non-ignorable in adulthood.Thus given the wide range of these co-morbidities and their potential for current and future harm to the child's health, addressing these problems individually without reducing the degree of obesity may be an acceptable and positive outcome of an obesity treatment. The reversal of adverse cardiovascular risk markers, such as increased blood pressure or dyslipidemia, is a clinical success, even without a reduction of obesity. Focusing the definition of ‘success' on the isolated outcome of a statistically significant reduction in some aspect of body size ignores the patient's well-being, emotional status, and the plethora of other obesity-associated problems that are relevant for the health of the child. In biomedical research, study designs can be ranked according to the strength of the evidence they can provide. Depending on the purpose - whether it is providing rapid treatment to a patient or to guiding a systematic review - there are different guidelines available [26]. One commonly used hierarchy ranks study designs based upon their internal validity [27]. Often depicted as a pyramid, RCTs are at the top, cohort studies are in the middle, and at the bottom are case reports [27]. In this scheme, controlled prospective trials in which subjects are not randomly allocated to the intervention but are compared with a control group fit somewhere just below RCTs. Although hierarchies of evidence are convenient groupings of types of studies, they can be overly simplistic and cannot be applied to all situations. For example, it has been shown that well designed observational studies can achieve the same results as a RCT aimed at answering the same question, yet at a lower cost and with faster data collection and analysis [28]. Further, no matter how strong a study design is, the conclusions drawn from it arise from the scientific rigor applied to examining and ruling out other potential causes of the intervention effect. Similarly, even though these hierarchies are useful, they do not imply that the RCT is the best design for all research questions from scientific, practical or even ethical points of view. In biomedical research and for validation purposes before regulatory authorities, the RCT study design is viewed as the superior approach to establish whether an intervention is efficacious or not. Most commonly, one group is assigned to receive the intervention in question, whereas the other group receives a placebo or another treatment modality available in a common setting representing the current ‘standard of care.' The RCT is well suited to studies of readily identifiable end points, such as pharmaceutical testing and surgical procedures. The design has high internal validity as well as the advantages of minimizing confounding, information and selection bias, and ruling out chance in the findings. Another advantage of this design is that it enhances the comparability of study results, especially if they are reported according to guidelines such as the CONSORT 2010 statement [29]. Inherent to the RCT design, however, is a limited generalizability of the results; a successful study in one setting does not guarantee that it can be replicated under normal conditions in another setting. Despite randomization, this study design does not eliminate confounding, but rather it allows for the measurement of the probability of confounding and thus an assessment of its effect on the outcomes of interest. Further, the RCT is a costly study design, which often limits the number of patients that can be included. This limitation has two consequences. First, a limited number of patients may be insufficient to actually test the effect of the intervention, and second, the inclusion of relatively small numbers of patients reduces the likelihood of observing side effects or complications of the treatment. Consequently, large-scale RCTs are difficult to finance. These limitations of the RCT design are especially relevant in the area of childhood obesity treatment where both the disease and its treatment are complex. In the case of testing childhood obesity treatment programs, the traditional RCT study design is not optimal and may even fail. Allocation into simple treatment modalities does not reflect clinical practice or the true effects of treatment. Childhood obesity is a chronic disease without a well-defined clinical endpoint to evaluate; simply moving from a classification of obese to overweight, reducing BMI z-score, or losing some weight does not represent the end of a treatment requirement by the child. The RCT is not well suited for assessing this type of long-term outcome. In terms of generalizability, there are methodological problems regarding eligibility criteria since most children and youth selected for RCT-based childhood obesity treatment are highly motivated and thus are not comparable to the general population of children and youth who are obese. In addition, recruitment into such studies may be limited by cultural and societal beliefs as well as the level of education of parents [30,31]. Moreover, these studies are typically performed in referral centers that treat children who are severely obese and may not be representative of the typical child who is ‘mildly obese' or without a myriad of co-morbidities. Aside from the limitations of the traditional RCT design in testing the efficacy of childhood obesity treatment protocols, it also presents an ethical dilemma of what care the control group should receive. In many childhood obesity interventions, the control group receives no treatment, is registered on a waiting list, or receives the standard care that is available at a given time (if indeed such a standard exists). From an ethical perspective, these approaches are problematic. In the era of the childhood obesity epidemic, it is questionable if randomization to no treatment is acceptable. The Helsinki declaration of 2008 states that ‘… The benefits, risks burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best current proven intervention except in the following circumstances: The use of placebo, or no treatment, is acceptable in studies where no current proven intervention exists …' [32]. Narrowly interpreted, as there are not yet proven long-term, effective and sustainable interventions for the treatment of childhood obesity [33], a non-treatment control group could be considered as acceptable. Viewed from a broader perspective, however, as there are interventions which produce the target outcome of weight loss or maintenance, even if it is not sustained for the long-term [4], the use of a non-treatment group is not acceptable. If one considers traditional diseases, most ethical committees would object to studies that randomize patients with diseases with known beneficial treatment options (such as cancer, diabetes, tuberculosis etc.) to no treatment. Yet, somehow, these standards are often not applied to childhood obesity. However, in recent years, given the extensive scope of the obesity epidemic and that children are becoming obese at progressively younger ages, many clinicians find this increasingly unethical and thus a violation of the Oath of Hippocrates. As an alternative, subjects in the non-treatment arm of a childhood obesity treatment study should receive, at a minimum, standard care. In this context, since a universally accepted treatment has not been developed, providing it is a challenge. A justifiable approach to treating childhood obesity can consist of a familial approach, using behavior changing techniques, as well as simple advice concerning healthy nutrition and physical activity or inactivity [4,34,35]. The behavioral approach must be accompanied by medical intervention(s) for specific obesity-related co-morbidities, where appropriate. Nonetheless, the definition of standard care remains vague as these elements are often delivered in varying combinations and intensities and in different settings (personal, group, familial approach, or separation of the treatment modalities between patient and family etc.). Further compounding the problem is that in many settings even a minimal level of care for the obese child does not exist - in developed, let alone developing countries. In the evaluation of childhood obesity treatments, an implicit assumption is made that if an intervention is to be declared successful, it should result in a sustained treatment effect. In contrast, this requirement is not met by treatments given for nearly all other pediatric chronic diseases such as asthma, diabetes, or epilepsy. Patients with these serious chronic diseases tend to have relapses, which occur even with continuous medical care, but more rapidly without. Additionally, another challenge in the evaluation of chronic care models is that patients receive complex and individually tailored treatment designs (with varying visit intervals, focus of attention, use of different types of health professionals etc.) that are difficult to evaluate using current designs. Moreover, interventions designed for clinical trials may be much more intensive and costly than what is possible and attainable in normal clinical settings, particularly with regard to time, usage, and funding. The success of interventions such as these, due to their lack of ‘real life' practicality, can result in frustration for practitioners who are unable to use these methods in their own setting. Unlike typical chronic medical conditions (such as hypertension or type 2 diabetes), the concept of childhood obesity may have cultural elements that should be incorporated and adapted into country-specific treatment and prevention programs - yet this significantly limits head-to-head evaluation of such interventions across Europe in empiric clinical trials. When considering what standard care should consist of, it is worthwhile to remember that childhood obesity is a long-term condition with associated co-morbidities, many of which are not always readily identifiable. It is clear that children with chronic diseases need a relevant diagnosis followed by regular visits to monitor the progression, the emergence of complications, and the treatment responses alongside the continuous treatment given. Such standards are fundamental in good clinical practice. Chronic diseases demand chronic treatment models and need to be evaluated using study designs that can accommodate the complexity of both the disease and its treatment. These prerogatives are obvious and universally accepted in terms of chronic diseases in pediatrics, but not so in relation childhood obesity per se. Therefore, just as with the intervention arm of a trial, the care provided to these children should address these co-morbidities in addition to weight loss or maintenance.If we are to move beyond viewing the traditional RCT as the ‘gold standard' in the evaluation of childhood obesity treatment programs, other designs must be explored. Such studies do not utilize a traditional RCT design, but rather employ a controlled trial design in which the comparison group is not randomly assigned and is often drawn from a source outside of the study. In this design, the most common sources of control subjects are: i) waiting lists, ii) usual care patients, and iii) a non-treatment group. Although appealing, many of these designs may not yield the comparison group that is expected by the researcher and each has ethical concerns, primarily that children who need treatment do not receive it. Another alternative is ‘The large simple trial' [36]. In this design, many institutions/doctors join together in different settings so that thousands of patients can be included in a study at a lower cost and with better coverage of potential side effects (than compared with studies of hundreds of patients) [36]. In this case, a detailed recording of the therapeutic approaches, the duration and frequency of visits, health personals involved, and measurement methods have to be performed in order to compare treatments. Thus, to move forward in an ethically responsible manner, RCT trials testing childhood obesity treatments should be based upon comparisons between different therapeutic modalities.Multiple observational studies have been published regarding childhood obesity interventions. Despite the known limitations and biases of such studies, large observational sample evaluations can be used to analyze the effectiveness of pre-defined interventions for specific populations. Based on investigations in other medical fields, using this approach prudently can yield conclusions that are quite similar to those derived from large RCTs [28]Given the ethical considerations, the diversity in the obesity phenotypes that require complex and individualized treatment strategies as well as the long-term follow-up, the traditional RCT is not ideally suited for testing the efficacy of childhood obesity treatments. It is timely that the research community shift towards accepting study designs that demonstrate the plausibility of an intervention rather than just a probability statement derived from a RCT. ‘Plausibility' refers to whether the intervention had an effect beyond what can be attributed to other external factors [37]. To make a strong plausibility statement, a control group still is required for comparison, but there is not a requirement that subjects are randomized to it. The commonly used sources (e.g. historical cohorts, waiting lists) can be used. A weaker statement can be made even if a control group is not used. Plausibility statements arise from the scientific rigor applied to examining and ruling out other potential causes for the treatment effect. Equally, the transparency of reports must increase, and the use of the CONSORT 2010 statement [29] would achieve this. Childhood obesity is a complex condition with a multitude of causes and complications (some of which are not readily identifiable); thus relying only upon tests of probability as the sole criteria for establishing that an intervention was successful is not reasonable. It is time that results derived from adequately designed studies that use observational designs aimed at making causal statements are accepted. Given these constraints, this study design may be the only practical and ethical design option to answer clinical questions relevant to specific populations in obesity is a chronic condition with late clinical many of are to the effectiveness of interventions in This can be using RCTs and is unethical for the arm of such In the evaluation of childhood obesity treatments it is time to move beyond viewing the RCT as the study design in terms of treatment of clinically relevant childhood obesity. It is not well suited to test the complex and chronic care required to treat these and if the control group is randomized to no treatment at it is The time has to standard care to all children who are obese and to evaluate treatment protocols by in terms of their children and who are obese both need and care. of to

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: There are few data on the prevalence and clinical outcome of hepatitis C infection in children. We studied 458 children who underwent cardiac surgery in Munich, Germany, before 1991, when blood-donor screening for hepatitis C was introduced in Germany. Their mean age at first operation was 2.8 years; none of the children had received blood transfusions before or 'after cardiac surgery, and none of their mothers had antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). We compared these patients with 458 control subjects matched for age and sex. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (14.6 percent) of the 458 patients who had undergone cardiac surgery had anti-HCV, as compared with 3 (0.7 percent) of the control subjects (P<0.001). At a mean interval of 19.8 years after the first operation, 37 (55 percent) of the 67 patients who were positive for anti-HCV had detectable HCV RNA in their blood. The infection had cleared in the other 30 patients, as evidenced by negative results on three polymerase-chain-reaction analyses performed at six-month intervals. Only 1 of the 37 patients who were positive for HCV RNA had elevated levels of liver enzymes; that patient had severe right-sided congestive heart failure. Of the 17 patients who underwent liver biopsies, only 3 had histologic signs of progressive liver damage. These three patients had additional risk factors: two had congestive heart failure, and the third had also been infected with hepatitis B virus. CONCLUSIONS: Children who had undergone cardiac surgery in Germany before the implementation of blood-donor screening for hepatitis C had a substantial risk of acquiring the infection. However, after about 20 years, the virus had spontaneously cleared in many patients. The clinical course in those still infected seems more benign than would be expected in people infected as adults.

BACKGROUND: Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most commonly reported childhood food problems. Community-based incidence and prevalence estimates vary widely, due to possible misinterpretations of presumed reactions to milk and differences in study design, particularly diagnostic criteria. METHODS: Children from the EuroPrevall birth cohort in 9 European countries with symptoms possibly related to CMA were invited for clinical evaluation including cows' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. RESULTS: Across Europe, 12 049 children were enrolled, and 9336 (77.5%) were followed up to 2 years of age. CMA was suspected in 358 children and confirmed in 55 resulting in an overall incidence of challenge-proven CMA of 0.54% (95% CI 0.41-0.70). National incidences ranged from 1% (in the Netherlands and UK) to <0.3% (in Lithuania, Germany and Greece). Of all children with CMA, 23.6% had no cow's milk-specific IgE in serum, especially those from UK, the Netherlands, Poland and Italy. Of children with CMA who were re-evaluated one year after diagnosis, 69% (22/32) tolerated cow's milk, including all children with non-IgE-associated CMA and 57% of those children with IgE-associated CMA. CONCLUSIONS: This unique pan-European birth cohort study using the gold standard diagnostic procedure for food allergies confirmed challenge-proven CMA in <1% of children up to age 2. Affected infants without detectable specific antibodies to cow's milk were very likely to tolerate cow's milk one year after diagnosis, whereas only half of those with specific antibodies in serum 'outgrew' their disease so soon.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological research has shown that hallucinations and delusions, the classic symptoms of psychosis, are far more prevalent in the population than actual psychotic disorder. These symptoms are especially prevalent in childhood and adolescence. Longitudinal research has demonstrated that psychotic symptoms in adolescence increase the risk of psychotic disorder in adulthood. There has been a lack of research, however, on the immediate clinicopathological significance of psychotic symptoms in adolescence. AIMS: To investigate the relationship between psychotic symptoms and non-psychotic psychopathology in community samples of adolescents in terms of prevalence, co-occurring disorders, comorbid (multiple) psychopathology and variation across early v. middle adolescence. METHOD: Data from four population studies were used: two early adolescence studies (ages 11-13 years) and two mid-adolescence studies (ages 13-16 years). Studies 1 and 2 involved school-based surveys of 2243 children aged 11-16 years for psychotic symptoms and for emotional and behavioural symptoms of psychopathology. Studies 3 and 4 involved in-depth diagnostic interview assessments of psychotic symptoms and lifetime psychiatric disorders in community samples of 423 children aged 11-15 years. RESULTS: Younger adolescents had a higher prevalence (21-23%) of psychotic symptoms than older adolescents (7%). In both age groups the majority of adolescents who reported psychotic symptoms had at least one diagnosable non-psychotic psychiatric disorder, although associations with psychopathology increased with age: nearly 80% of the mid-adolescence sample who reported psychotic symptoms had at least one diagnosis, compared with 57% of the early adolescence sample. Adolescents who reported psychotic symptoms were at particularly high risk of having multiple co-occurring diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotic symptoms are important risk markers for a wide range of non-psychotic psychopathological disorders, in particular for severe psychopathology characterised by multiple co-occurring diagnoses. These symptoms should be carefully assessed in all patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day added to 1-3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. METHODS: During this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with persisting seizures on 1-3 AEDs were randomized to perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day or placebo following a 6-week baseline phase. Perampanel was titrated weekly by 2 mg/day and maintained at the dose achieved for 13 weeks. Primary endpoints were median percent change in seizure frequency and 50% responder rate. Analysis of covariance was performed on all treated patients with any seizure data (recorded in daily diaries) in the double-blind phase. RESULTS: A total of 706 patients were randomized and received trial medication; 623 completed the trial. Median percent change in seizure frequency-the primary efficacy endpoint-was -10.7%, -13.6%, -23.3%, and -30.8% for placebo, perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day, respectively. The difference from placebo was statistically significant for perampanel 4 mg/day (p = 0.0026) and 8 mg/day (p < 0.0001). The corresponding 50% responder rates were 17.9%, 20.6%, 28.5%, and 34.9%. The difference from placebo was statistically significant for perampanel 4 mg/day (p = 0.0132) and 8 mg/day (p = 0.0003). An apparent dose response was suggested for dizziness, which was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated that adjunctive perampanel effectively reduced seizure frequency and possessed a favorable tolerability profile in patients ≥12 years with partial-onset seizures (with or without secondary generalization), with a minimum effective dose of 4 mg/day. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that 4 and 8 mg/day doses of adjunctive perampanel are effective and tolerated in reducing partial-onset seizures.

Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) using clamshell or buttoned devices is accompanied by a high incidence of residual shunt. Recently, a new self-centering device, the Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO), has been evaluated in an animal model with very good results. Therefore, our purpose is to report on our initial clinical experience with this device. Thirty patients underwent an attempt at catheter closure of their ASDs at a median age of 6.1 yr (range, 2.9-62.4 yr) and median weight of 22 kg (range, 13-69 kg) using the ASO. The median ASD diameter measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was 12.5 mm (range, 5-21 mm), and the median ASD balloon stretched diameter was 14 mm (range, 7-19 mm). All patients had right atrial and ventricular volume overload with a mean +/- SD Qp/Qs of 2.3 +/- 0.6. A 7F catheter was used for delivery of the device in all patients. The device was placed correctly in all patients. There was immediate and complete closure (C) in 17/30 patients, 10 patients had trivial residual shunt (TS), and 3 had moderate residual shunt (MS). The median fluoroscopy time was 15 min (range, 8-35 min), and the median total procedure time was 92.5 min (range, 40-135 min). There was no episode of device embolization or any other complication. Follow-up was performed using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) 1 day, 1 mo, 3 mo, and yearly thereafter. At 1 day, there was C of the ASD in 24/30 patients, 3 had TS, 1 had small shunt (SS), and 2 had MS. At a median follow-up interval of 6 mo, there have been no episodes of endocarditis, thromboembolism, or wire fracture. We conclude that the use of the new ASO is safe and effective in complete closure of secundum ASDs up to a diameter of 21 mm in the majority of patients. Further clinical trials are underway.

We analysed the impact of age and gender on biology and outcome of 2084 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) between October 1986 and December 2002 and treated according to the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) multicentre protocols NHL-BFM-86, -90 and -95. Median age at diagnosis was 8.0 years for 97 precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (pB-LBL) patients, 8.8 years for 335 T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) patients, 8.4 years for 1004 Burkitt's lymphoma/leukaemia (BL/B-AL) patients, 11.4 years for 173 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (centroblastic subtype) (DLBCL-CB) patients, 13.2 years for 40 primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBL) patients and 10.8 years for 215 anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) patients (P < 0.00001). The male:female ratio was 0.9:1 for pB-LBL and PMLBL, 1.7:1 for DLBCL-CB, 1.8:1 for ALCL, 2.5:1 for T-LBL and 4.5:1 for BL/B-AL (P < 0.00001). The probability of event-free survival at 5 years (5-year pEFS) was 85 +/- 1% for all 2084 patients [median follow-up 5.7 (0.1-15.9) years], and was significantly superior for male T-LBL and DLBCL-CB patients. Comparing age-groups 0-4, 5-9, 10-14 and 15-18 years, pEFS was inferior for the youngest patients only in the pB-LBL- and ALCL-groups. T-LBL and DLBCL-CB adolescent females had worse outcome than younger girls while age had no impact on pEFS for boys. We conclude that the distribution of age and gender differed between NHL-subtypes. The impact of gender on outcome differed between NHL subgroups. The prognostic impact of age differed not only by NHL-subtype but also according to gender in some subtypes.

Cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) deficiency is a rare inherited disorder in the methionine catabolic pathway, in which the impaired synthesis of cystathionine leads to accumulation of homocysteine. Patients can present to many different specialists and diagnosis is often delayed. Severely affected patients usually present in childhood with ectopia lentis, learning difficulties and skeletal abnormalities. These patients generally require treatment with a low-methionine diet and/or betaine. In contrast, mildly affected patients are likely to present as adults with thromboembolism and to respond to treatment with pyridoxine. In this article, we present recommendations for the diagnosis and management of CBS deficiency, based on a systematic review of the literature. Unfortunately, the quality of the evidence is poor, as it often is for rare diseases. We strongly recommend measuring the plasma total homocysteine concentrations in any patient whose clinical features suggest the diagnosis. Our recommendations may help to standardise testing for pyridoxine responsiveness. Current evidence suggests that patients are unlikely to develop complications if the plasma total homocysteine concentration is maintained below 120 μmol/L. Nevertheless, we recommend keeping the concentration below 100 μmol/L because levels fluctuate and the complications associated with high levels are so serious.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative cisplatin alone may be as effective as cisplatin plus doxorubicin in standard-risk hepatoblastoma (a tumor involving three or fewer sectors of the liver that is associated with an alpha-fetoprotein level of >100 ng per milliliter). METHODS: Children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma who were younger than 16 years of age were eligible for inclusion in the study. After they received one cycle of cisplatin (80 mg per square meter of body-surface area per 24 hours), we randomly assigned patients to receive cisplatin (every 14 days) or cisplatin plus doxorubicin administered in three preoperative cycles and two postoperative cycles. The primary outcome was the rate of complete resection, and the trial was powered to test the noninferiority of cisplatin alone (<10% difference in the rate of complete resection). RESULTS: Between June 1998 and December 2006, 126 patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin and 129 were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin plus doxorubicin. The rate of complete resection was 95% in the cisplatin-alone group and 93% in the cisplatin-doxorubicin group in the intention-to-treat analysis (difference, 1.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.1 to 7.0); these rates were 99% and 95%, respectively, in the per-protocol analysis. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 83% (95% CI, 77 to 90) and 95% (95% CI, 91 to 99) in the cisplatin group, and 85% (95% CI, 79 to 92) and 93% (95% CI, 88 to 98) in the cisplatin-doxorubicin group (median follow-up, 46 months). Acute grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (74.4% vs. 20.6%). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with cisplatin plus doxorubicin, cisplatin monotherapy achieved similar rates of complete resection and survival among children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma. Doxorubicin can be safely omitted from the treatment of standard-risk hepatoblastoma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003912.)

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Kashin-Beck disease is a degenerative osteoarticular disorder that is endemic to certain areas of Tibet, where selenium deficiency is also endemic. Because selenium is involved in thyroid hormone metabolism, we studied the relation among the serum selenium concentration, thyroid function, and Kashin-Beck disease in 575 subjects 5 to 15 years of age in 12 villages around Lhasa, Tibet, including 1 control village in which no subject had Kashin-Beck disease. Clinical, radiologic, and biochemical data were collected. RESULTS: Among the 575 subjects, 280 (49 percent) had Kashin-Beck disease, 267 (46 percent) had goiter, and 7 (1 percent) had cretinism. Of the 557 subjects in whom urinary iodine was measured, 66 percent had a urinary iodine concentration of less than 2 microg per deciliter (157 nmol per liter; normal, 5 to 25 microg per deciliter [394 to 1968 nmol per liter]). The mean urinary iodine concentration was lower in subjects with Kashin-Beck disease than in control subjects (1.2 vs. 1.8 microg per deciliter [94 vs. 142 nmol per liter], P<0.001) and hypothyroidism was more frequent (23 percent vs. 4 percent, P=0.01). Severe selenium deficiency was documented in all villages; 38 percent of subjects had serum concentrations of less than 5 ng per milliliter (64 nmol per liter; normal, 60 to 105 ng per milliliter [762 to 1334 nmol per liter]). When age and sex were controlled for in a multivariate analysis, low urinary iodine, high serum thyrotropin, and low serum thyroxine-binding globulin values were associated with an increased risk of Kashin-Beck disease, but a low serum selenium concentration was not. CONCLUSIONS: In areas where severe selenium deficiency is endemic, iodine deficiency is a risk factor for Kashin-Beck disease.

Pulmonary insufficiency is the main cause of death in cystic fibrosis (CF). We analysed forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) data of 14,732 patients registered in the European Cystic Fibrosis Society Patient Registry (ECFSPR) database in 2007. We used linear and logistic regressions to investigate associations between FEV1 % predicted and clinical outcomes. Body mass index (BMI), chronic infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pancreatic status and CF-related diabetes (CFRD) showed a statistically significant (all p<0.0001) and clinically relevant effect on FEV1 % pred after adjusting for age. Patients with a lower BMI experience a six-fold increased odds ratio (95% CI 5.0-7.3) of having severe lung disease (FEV1 <40% pred) compared to patients with normal BMI. Being chronically infected with P. aeruginosa increases the odds ratio of severe lung disease by 2.4 (95% CI 2.0-2.7), and patients with pancreatic insufficiency experience a 2.0-fold increased odds ratio (95% CI 1.6-2.5) of severe lung disease compared to pancreatic sufficient patients. Patients with CFRD have a 1.8-fold increased odds ratio (95% CI 1.6-2.2) compared to patients not affected. These potential risk factors for pulmonary disease in patients with CF are to some degree preventable or treatable. We emphasise the importance of their early identification through frequent routine tests, the implementation of infection control measures, and a timely initiation of relevant therapies.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an assessment tool for use in intercenter audit studies of cleft speech and to test its acceptability, validity, and reliability. The tool is to be used systematically to record and report speech outcomes, providing an indication of treatment needs and continuing burden of care. SETTING: Regional Cleft Center, U.K. METHODS: The Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented (CAPS-A) was developed by three cleft speech experts who identified the key features required from existing assessment measures. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented outcomes reported for 20 cases with clinical assessment results and other investigations. Intra- and interrater reliability were tested following the training of specialist speech and language therapists who used the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented on two occasions to assess 10 cases. The raters evaluated acceptability and ease of using a questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean percentage agreement for criterion validity in each section was 87% (range 70% to 100%). Both intra- and interexaminer reliability were rated as good/very good (Kappa 0.61 to 1.00) for seven sections and moderate (Kappa 0.41 to 0.60) for three sections. Raters reported that the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented was acceptable and easy to use with appropriate training. CONCLUSION: An acceptable, valid, and reliable cleft speech audit tool has been developed based on a small sample. The Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented is recommended for use in intercenter audit studies in the U.K. and Ireland and could be used in other English-speaking countries. In addition, it has wider applicability for use in reporting speech outcomes of surgical procedures.

Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation (CM-AVM) is an autosomal-dominant disorder, caused by heterozygous RASA1 mutations, and manifesting multifocal CMs and high risk for fast-flow lesions. A limited number of patients have been reported, raising the question of the phenotypic borders. We identified new patients with a clinical diagnosis of CM-AVM, and patients with overlapping phenotypes. RASA1 was screened in 261 index patients with: CM-AVM (n = 100), common CM(s) (port-wine stain; n = 100), Sturge-Weber syndrome (n = 37), or isolated AVM(s) (n = 24). Fifty-eight distinct RASA1 mutations (43 novel) were identified in 68 index patients with CM-AVM and none in patients with other phenotypes. A novel clinical feature was identified: cutaneous zones of numerous small white pale halos with a central red spot. An additional question addressed in this study was the "second-hit" hypothesis as a pathophysiological mechanism for CM-AVM. One tissue from a patient with a germline RASA1 mutation was available. The analysis of the tissue showed loss of the wild-type RASA1 allele. In conclusion, mutations in RASA1 underscore the specific CM-AVM phenotype and the clinical diagnosis is based on identifying the characteristic CMs. The high incidence of fast-flow lesions warrants careful clinical and radiologic examination, and regular follow-up.

Niemann-Pick Type C (NPC) is a progressive and life limiting autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in either the NPC1 or NPC2 gene. Mutations in these genes are associated with abnormal endosomal-lysosomal trafficking, resulting in the accumulation of multiple tissue specific lipids in the lysosomes. The clinical spectrum of NPC disease ranges from a neonatal rapidly progressive fatal disorder to an adult-onset chronic neurodegenerative disease. The age of onset of the first (beyond 3 months of life) neurological symptom may predict the severity of the disease and determines life expectancy.NPC has an estimated incidence of ~ 1: 100,000 and the rarity of the disease translate into misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis and barriers to good care. For these reasons, we have developed clinical guidelines that define standard of care for NPC patients, foster shared care arrangements between expert centres and family physicians, and empower patients. The information contained in these guidelines was obtained through a systematic review of the literature and the experiences of the authors in their care of patients with NPC. We adopted the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) system as method of choice for the guideline development process. We made a series of conclusive statements and scored them according to level of evidence, strengths of recommendations and expert opinions. These guidelines can inform care providers, care funders, patients and their carers of best practice of care for patients with NPC. In addition, these guidelines have identified gaps in the knowledge that must be filled by future research. It is anticipated that the implementation of these guidelines will lead to a step change in the quality of care for patients with NPC irrespective of their geographical location.