Vienna General Hospital

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy and safety of infliximab and azathioprine therapy alone or in combination for Crohn's disease are unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the efficacy of infliximab monotherapy, azathioprine monotherapy, and the two drugs combined in 508 adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had not undergone previous immunosuppressive or biologic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of 5 mg of infliximab per kilogram of body weight at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 8 weeks plus daily oral placebo capsules; 2.5 mg of oral azathioprine per kilogram daily plus a placebo infusion on the standard schedule; or combination therapy with the two drugs. Patients received study medication through week 30 and could continue in a blinded study extension through week 50. RESULTS: Of the 169 patients receiving combination therapy, 96 (56.8%) were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 26 (the primary end point), as compared with 75 of 169 patients (44.4%) receiving infliximab alone (P=0.02) and 51 of 170 patients (30.0%) receiving azathioprine alone (P<0.001 for the comparison with combination therapy and P=0.006 for the comparison with infliximab). Similar numerical trends were found at week 50. At week 26, mucosal healing had occurred in 47 of 107 patients (43.9%) receiving combination therapy, as compared with 28 of 93 patients (30.1%) receiving infliximab (P=0.06) and 18 of 109 patients (16.5%) receiving azathioprine (P<0.001 for the comparison with combination therapy and P=0.02 for the comparison with infliximab). Serious infections developed in 3.9% of patients in the combination-therapy group, 4.9% of those in the infliximab group, and 5.6% of those in the azathioprine group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who were treated with infliximab plus azathioprine or infliximab monotherapy were more likely to have a corticosteroid-free clinical remission than those receiving azathioprine monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094458.)

The AASLD/EASL Practice Guideline Subcommittee on Hepatic Encephalopathy are: Jayant A. Talwalkar (Chair, AASLD), Hari S. Conjeevaram, Michael Porayko, Raphael B. Merriman, Peter L.M. Jansen, and Fabien Zoulim. This guideline has been approved by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and represents the position of both associations. These recommendations provide a data-supported approach. They are based on the following: (1) formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic; (2) guideline policies covered by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/European Association for the Study of the Liver (AASLD/EASL) Policy on the Joint Development and Use of Practice Guidelines; and (3) the experience of the authors in the specified topic. Intended for use by physicians, these recommendations suggest preferred approaches to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of care. They are intended to be flexible, in contrast to standards of care, which are inflexible policies to be followed in every case. Specific recommendations are based on relevant published information. To more fully characterize the available evidence supporting the recommendations, the AASLD/EASL Practice Guidelines Subcommittee has adopted the classification used by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) workgroup, with minor modifications (Table 1). The classifications and recommendations are based on three categories: the source of evidence in levels I through III; the quality of evidence designated by high (A), moderate (B), or low quality (C); and the strength of recommendations classified as strong (1) or weak (2). The literature databases and search strategies are outlined below. The resulting literature database was available to all members of the writing group (i.e., the authors). They selected references within their field of expertise and experience and graded the references according to the GRADE system.1 The selection of references for the guideline was based on a validation of the appropriateness of the study design for the stated purpose, a relevant number of patients under study, and confidence in the participating centers and authors. References on original data were preferred and those that were found unsatisfactory in any of these respects were excluded from further evaluation. There may be limitations in this approach when recommendations are needed on rare problems or problems on which scant original data are available. In such cases, it may be necessary to rely on less-qualified references with a low grading. As a result of the important changes in the treatment of complications of cirrhosis (renal failure, infections, and variceal bleeding [VB]), studies performed more than 30 years ago have generally not been considered for these guidelines. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication and one of the most debilitating manifestations of liver disease, severely affecting the lives of patients and their caregivers. Furthermore, cognitive impairment associated with cirrhosis results in utilization of more health care resources in adults than other manifestations of liver disease.2 Progress in the area has been hindered by the complex pathogenesis that is not yet fully elucidated. Apart from such biological factors, there remains the larger obstacle that there are no universally accepted standards for the definition, diagnosis, classification, or treatment of HE, mostly as a result of insufficient clinical studies and standardized definitions. Clinical management tends to be dependent on local standards and personal views. This is an unfavorable situation for patients and contrasts with the severity of the condition and the high level of standardization in other complications of cirrhosis. The lack of consistency in the nomenclature and general standards renders comparisons among studies and patient populations difficult, introduces bias, and hinders progress in clinical research for HE. The latest attempts to standardize the nomenclature were published in 2002 and suggestions for the design of HE trials in 2011. Because there is an unmet need for recommendations on the clinical management of HE, the EASL and the AASLD jointly agreed to create these practice guidelines. It is beyond the scope of these guidelines to elaborate on the theories of pathogenesis of HE, as well as the management of encephalopathy resulting from acute liver failure (ALF), which has been published as guidelines recently. Rather, its aim is to present standardized terminology and recommendations to all health care workers who have patients with HE, regardless of their medical discipline, and focus on adult patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), which is, by far, the most frequent scenario. As these guidelines on HE were created, the authors found a limited amount of high-quality evidence to extract from the existing literature. There are many reasons for this; the elusive character of HE is among them, as well as the lack of generally accepted and utilized terms for description and categorization of HE. This makes a practice guideline all the more necessary for future improvement of clinical studies and, subsequently, the quality of management of patients with HE. With the existing body of evidence, these guidelines encompass the authors' best, carefully considered opinions. Although not all readers may necessarily agree with all aspects of the guidelines, their creation and adherence to them is the best way forward, with future adjustments when there is emergence of new evidence. Advanced liver disease and portosystemic shunting (PSS), far from being an isolated disorder of the liver, have well-known consequences on the body and, notably, on brain functioning. The alterations of brain functioning, which can produce behavioral, cognitive, and motor effects, were termed portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE)3 and later included in the term HE.4 Unless the underlying liver disease is successfully treated, HE is associated with poor survival and a high risk of recurrence.5, 6 Even in its mildest form, HE reduces health-related quality of life and is a risk factor for bouts of severe HE.7-9 Hepatic encephalopathy is a brain dysfunction caused by liver it as a of or from alterations to This definition, in with is based on the that are of brain and that the a to liver The and of HE are to the severity of the underlying liver and In patients with fully HE is an that the of the disease, such as or encephalopathy is in cirrhosis with The of HE may not be an clinical and there are used for its which the in the and The of the of of cirrhosis is in in those with and in patients with portosystemic The that in of those with cirrhosis their clinical and in the in most HE or HE in of patients with The of HE in is not well The risk for the of is within years cirrhosis diagnosis, on the of risk factors, such as other complications to cirrhosis or infections, or and and with a of were found to have a risk of and with have a risk of within 6 Even with cirrhosis and cognitive dysfunction or one of years of the of is and is by the patient selection data were by It an of the frequent of the health care by patients with HE that for in the in the European are not these are to be Furthermore, the of and cirrhosis is and more be to further the of HE. Hepatic encephalopathy a of and In its HE and as well as and other brain As HE such as and may be by the and alterations in and motor of the with are of the is may to and and acute with or and, The for Hepatic Encephalopathy and the of or as the of In patients with HE, motor such as and a can be In may and in can be can are in such as and of and with are in the of to or or is present in the to of HE that or and is, in not a a of of It is by that such as of the with or the of the can be in other such as the and is not of HE it can be in other the cognitive or and motor of HE may not be or not progress in in in the severity of HE. Hepatic is a of HE to by severe motor the of with and of with and or alterations have been and not to may with liver HE may present with with in which brain brain This condition was a term considered this is to and may be more than in patients with liver disease, in of Apart from these manifestations of HE, it is accepted in clinical practice that all of HE and their manifestations are and this is a for treatment research on HE patients and on patients of bouts of on the from those to other may and are later under of may be associated with in and Hepatic encephalopathy be classified according to all of the to the underlying disease, HE is to the severity of The that is HE has been clinical and research a of such is (Table classifications that to aim and and be used to its HE is to the of factors, HE is for standards and expertise lack of or of or or for to to classification, according to or not the patient has liver failure has recently been Although the and this classification is a research The the of of HE in a patient with severe liver who not have of brain The of for HE and the of HE. The the level of (Table Hepatic encephalopathy be classified according to the of underlying disease, severity of and 1). is other that can brain and HE 1). and of HE be and classified according to all factors, and this be relevant according to the clinical The recommendations are in and the severity of HE is as a The strategies in from clinical to and of the are for the The and according to the of the and the of The of is based on a clinical and a clinical Clinical are used to its Specific are needed in study The is the clinical are with limited for I HE, and a lack of can be in clinical In the of and has and are as of or have been used to the severity of In patients with the is and an cognitive dysfunction is not It can be from clinical as well as or The is to them to HE. this remains a of in this patient that is to resulting from of and disease (Table as of other by and for a patient with in HE is encephalopathy and is as the of or clinical of brain dysfunction in patients with who are not or The term that there is no clinical cognitive or of HE. The term and HE. strategies can be and Because the condition of cognitive functioning, which may not be to the the the use of on the local and and with one of the being more accepted as to as a for and is important it can poor quality of life and and patients and the The of and in patients with to be as high as every patient risk be this may be and the consequences of the are not and treatment is not approach may be to patients who have problems with their quality of life or in there are from the patients and their for or HE patients risk for Furthermore, of the available are for the and it is important to patients who not have factors, such as or be by a to that the the result is (i.e., for or in 6 has been of or not that the is a are not to to and are not in the best of both the patient and the local the of patients with HE on the consequences of their and, the is to the have the patient for In cases, the with the that have the expertise to and the to the Although the have been used to for and there is, most a poor them HE is a is with and it is HE a in the of these and of the results for further management need an of the and on the of HE are the of or by of the and one of the following: or or or In the clinical or may use for the severity of HE with which are that data are available and the have been for use in this patient levels not any diagnostic, or in HE patients with in an level is in a patient with and it is the of HE is in of may be to the There may be to which be is in or the relevant be are be when standards for or or other not or information. the risk of is in this patient and the may be a brain is of the of HE and on clinical of other Hepatic encephalopathy be as a from cognitive with through 1). The of HE is through of other of brain dysfunction 1). Hepatic encephalopathy be of the of and the need for care 1). encephalopathy is by clinical and can be graded according the and the 1). The and of and can be and that be performed by 1). for and be used in patients who most from such as those with quality of life or on or not any diagnostic, or for HE in patients with for 1). this is encephalopathy and as its is not on clinical and is by outlined in the its and can have a on a can there may be an to such a patient impairment in quality of or cognitive Liver is under the treatment recommendations for treatment of the following: of or be 1). an for HE is 1). for of of is not in patients with cirrhosis with a high risk to HE with liver failure, is an for approach to management of HE is of care for patients with of be and of and their of HE treatment with of HE who are risk or to their need more and are in an care of encephalopathy are not in patients with cirrhosis. other of encephalopathy are the of encephalopathy may not be termed HE. In the clinical is treatment of both HE and in the management of is of of patients can be with of the to this is the of HE In to the other of the approach to treatment of HE, treatment is of the have not been by studies and are utilized based on These such as and such as such as and other have been In the a can be used to in patients who are to or have an is generally used as treatment for of data not as a for treatment of for it not the and these to be used of of a clinical search for and for the brain it is that the being a that the of in the and of have an beyond the studies have not those In most trials on have been in to the in of In is preferred to based on of In populations with a high of the use of has been the to that and were to was The use of further The of be when the three of the approach are with of every or are the is to to three This be It is a that lack of of of is by larger There is a for of to such as and severe and can has been used for the of HE in a number of it with other and in These trials of that was or to the with with for patients with has been in three trials to and one in cognitive improvement and with patients bouts to the of the of data the use of have been used for treatment of HE, data to their use are or most of these can be used their limited of trials that the manifestations of HE or There is no of on the of These through their as in have been used for treatment of of the for many are available and present as has been for HE, further clinical are was in a on patients who or more of HE in the 6 and who were on The of HE and as well as to clinical studies on the are under way and, may to clinical on patients with HE improvement by in and with is study of or no in patients with cirrhosis who from HE found of HE in the or to were not There was no in of in any of the of the shunting the that may be by the of by the This has its and was used in the for HE it is a As has for its and these for This is not It in improvement on or The may be of in to the may be in by when or when is not have the of and no have been on this on patients on or no on of HE, was to and for HE 1). is the for treatment of 1). is an to for of 1). can be used as an or to patients to can be used as an or to patients to is an for treatment of is an for treatment of There are no trials of for of from it is and of of HE in patients with as of HE to to is the to in patients who have one or more bouts of on treatment their of was to complications of its to the of HE, or HE, was with severe HE as a complication of a a it was to use HE treatment to HE. one study that HE any than selection has the of severe HE it can the original for may important with to the of low a of can to HE, as There is a lack of on to aim to by or The is associated with more bouts of It is used to HE as with other of HE, the that be by of bouts of HE in patients with liver to a search for of such as can be successfully with of HE in a of patients in a liver the risk for is for of of HE the 1). as an to is for of of HE the 1). or is not for the of HE 1). There is a to treatment it has successfully a of The may be that the for is patients are high risk for This risk to as liver are bouts of from a well-known of a factor can be such as or variceal HE may not be a risk and HE can be Even more on the risk for further bouts of is liver and body patients a amount of liver and from the bouts of may well be to HE There are data on this for or HE patients risk for HE. the have been well (i.e., and or liver or may be Although it is not to for and studies have been performed of The of studies have been for than 6 and not the of the the from trials to studies from and studies have an improvement in the underlying cognitive the of has among of studies used relevant It was in an that can of the of the study to be in a larger study in a recommendations can be and have improvement in quality of and in have been the and of and them to as this Because of the used to and treatment and used in trials to treatment for is not this be on a that are approved for for patients with and I HE. of and is not from a 1). of is to the management of all of HE, and are guidelines for of patients with HE are is and of patients with HE from with of and is are than that of patients and are risk of and of is a risk factor for of HE and other cirrhosis has been to be an important in patients with HE patients an of by a with data and strength as of In the is to the the and are and Although body is the may be as well as the such as are for clinical The patient a by a or other The of HE patients for The is by moderate as below. the and a be with of may be the most available not be utilized as the be to patients that can by to patients who the and to other The be and The use of a is generally there are no data on the of and Specific is there are and is considered when HE. is of be and any of of be as to of in patients with cirrhosis. severe is this be There is that be for patients with HE. of may be in the of not be of or or with is to of may be used to HE and generally the of patients with for an of HE has no The studies on the of have been more and by a of the of these may to have more important on of of body than a on HE. be body 1). be 1). or the and a be 1). may to be and in patients of Liver remains the treatment for HE that not on any other is not its The management of these as in the has been published and European guidelines are under Hepatic encephalopathy by is not considered an for associated with poor liver HE severely the quality of life and be medical and who may be liver may and HE, be and considered or the severe be Hepatic encephalopathy it is important to HE from other of such as disease and and of the brain be and the patient be by an in and The and health be that may brain impairment and that not all manifestations of HE are fully by and not is the of a in the The search of the is difficult, and the may have with liver disease and those with HE are of are a frequent associated with and levels in of may be to associated with a search for or are not and the be from a clinical As outlined under the of HE is and more of HE be with being to for HE and to The patients with HE in the in of utilization for this group of patients is as a result of of and more complex and as well as a of There are no by from the be the and the and These are an care, and and the on the or were not The of is to in it from to and are by the the can the of based on that are as of and from in patients with or the of other to be the most The manifestations of HE are have to be considered as an source of dysfunction in any patient with important are and is bleeding and is an risk factor for of HE in patients with The of HE and the to with has been as a risk factor for of HE, in patients with the may be in other cirrhosis risk to HE has been in patients with cirrhosis with of the severity of cirrhosis. are in of patients with cirrhosis with and in of those with with cirrhosis not from patients cirrhosis their risk to brain dysfunction with it is that and with to the of HE. in patients with may as a of in cirrhosis of any The of and be as being the result of or by clinical In any of be the of the underlying liver disease on brain are for and difficult, may be the result of Even patients with disorder and no clinical disease have been to in and and and motor The cognitive dysfunction is more in those patients with disorder who are risk of encephalopathy as a result of or of the it remains the of brain in patients with is the result of HE, or There is evidence that is present and within the of patients chronic of the of their liver and patients with liver disease cognitive and patients with cirrhosis and may have severe and impairment of and of the of liver Because HE with all and underlying it is in the to the of HE and those resulting from other In cases, the and to may be the best of HE. As a level in a patient of HE for of the used present has been for their to HE and other of brain The not be by or may changes to those with HE in of or are to are to for these have been for their use in HE, the results are brain be in every patient with and of brain to In rare cases, by may be a for HE, the be This with research the management of HE. such research be based on research the of HE. It is necessary to more which liver are for of which alterations in and failure of these liver which brain are to the of the and, which this that result in the emergence of HE or the research and clinical management in result in new and treatment that need and clinical There is a severe and unmet need for clinical trials on treatment on all the of HE. clinical studies are the number of patients and their utilization is There are no data on which and patients the and research is needed to the of there is an insufficient for resources and policies management of HE. that were for HE ago were a of care is study of treatment for HE be or the of care. It is to to and The of recently is in the of and there is a need for trials on HE. There is an unmet need for research that is necessary to a for clinical The of and has it is not to results among studies and the be It may be to and HE that the of liver failure and with more than one important area of is the term which was to I of is and This to be by a approach. the isolated liver failure and HE be by clinical and brain brain is and are needed to the of that can be in patients with liver be more classified and based on and to the of clinical practice and studies in They be on the of HE on and to use and the in clinical (Table on and among on aspects on and with treatment studies on that can which patients may from Development of to when and to the on (i.e., and use on on for and of dysfunction on who from the for to and on cognitive improvement on to and be the to new which have been and are not a for studies The existing literature from a lack of and this makes of data or to consistency the field have been published by is a of the

Research on hepatic encephalopathy is hampered by the imprecise definition of this disabling complication of liver disease. Under this light, the Organisation Mondiale de Gastroentérologie commissioned a Working Party to reach a consensus in this area and to present it at the 11th World Congress of Gastroenterology in Vienna (1998). The Working Party continued its work thereafter and now present their final report. In summary, the Working Party has suggested a modification of current nomenclature for clinical diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy; proposed guidelines for the performance of future clinical trials in hepatic encephalopathy; and felt the need for a large study to redefine neuropsychiatric abnormalities in liver disease, which would allow the diagnosis of minimal (subclinical) encephalopathy to be made on firm statistical grounds. In the interim, it proposes the use of a psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score, based on the result of 5 neuropsychologic tests. Finally, the need for a careful evaluation of the newer neuroimaging modalities for the diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy was stressed.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome are severe microvascular disorders of platelet clumping with similar signs and symptoms. Unusually large multimers of von Willebrand factor, capable of agglutinating circulating platelets under high shear stress, occur in the two conditions. We investigated the prevalence of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease deficiency in patients with familial and nonfamilial forms of these disorders. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 53 patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease was assayed in diluted plasma samples with purified normal von Willebrand factor as the substrate. The extent of the degradation of von Willebrand factor was assessed by electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose gels and immunoblotting. To determine whether an inhibitor of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease was present, we measured the protease activity in normal plasma after incubation with plasma from the patients. RESULTS: We examined 30 patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and 23 patients with the hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Of 24 patients with nonfamilial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, 20 had severe and 4 had moderate protease deficiency during an acute event. An inhibitor found in 20 of these patients was shown to be IgG in five of five tested plasma samples. Of 13 patients with nonfamilial hemolytic-uremic syndrome, 11 had normal levels of activity of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease during the acute episode, whereas in 2 patients, the activity was slightly decreased. All 6 patients with familial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura lacked von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease activity but had no inhibitor, whereas all 10 patients with familial hemolytic-uremic syndrome had normal protease activity. In vitro proteolytic degradation of von Willebrand factor by the protease was studied in 5 patients with familial and 7 patients with nonfamilial hemolytic-uremic syndrome and was normal in all 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nonfamilial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is due to an inhibitor of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease, whereas the familial form seems to be caused by a constitutional deficiency of the protease. Patients with the hemolyticuremic syndrome do not have a deficiency of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease or a defect in von Willebrand factor that leads to its resistance to protease.

BACKGROUND: The role of fibrinolytic therapy in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism is controversial. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared tenecteplase plus heparin with placebo plus heparin in normotensive patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Eligible patients had right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography or computed tomography, as well as myocardial injury as indicated by a positive test for cardiac troponin I or troponin T. The primary outcome was death or hemodynamic decompensation (or collapse) within 7 days after randomization. The main safety outcomes were major extracranial bleeding and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 7 days after randomization. RESULTS: Of 1006 patients who underwent randomization, 1005 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Death or hemodynamic decompensation occurred in 13 of 506 patients (2.6%) in the tenecteplase group as compared with 28 of 499 (5.6%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.87; P=0.02). Between randomization and day 7, a total of 6 patients (1.2%) in the tenecteplase group and 9 (1.8%) in the placebo group died (P=0.42). Extracranial bleeding occurred in 32 patients (6.3%) in the tenecteplase group and 6 patients (1.2%) in the placebo group (P<0.001). Stroke occurred in 12 patients (2.4%) in the tenecteplase group and was hemorrhagic in 10 patients; 1 patient (0.2%) in the placebo group had a stroke, which was hemorrhagic (P=0.003). By day 30, a total of 12 patients (2.4%) in the tenecteplase group and 16 patients (3.2%) in the placebo group had died (P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, fibrinolytic therapy prevented hemodynamic decompensation but increased the risk of major hemorrhage and stroke. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique in France and others; PEITHO EudraCT number, 2006-005328-18; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00639743.).

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to assess severity of illness and predict vital status at hospital discharge based on ICU admission data. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 16,784 patients consecutively admitted to 303 intensive care units from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ICU admission data (recorded within +/-1 h) were used, describing: prior chronic conditions and diseases; circumstances related to and physiologic derangement at ICU admission. Selection of variables for inclusion into the model used different complementary strategies. For cross-validation, the model-building procedure was run five times, using randomly selected four fifths of the sample as a development- and the remaining fifth as validation-set. Logistic regression methods were then used to reduce complexity of the model. Final estimates of regression coefficients were determined by use of multilevel logistic regression. Variables selection and weighting were further checked by bootstraping (at patient level and at ICU level). Twenty variables were selected for the final model, which exhibited good discrimination (aROC curve 0.848), without major differences across patient typologies. Calibration was also satisfactory (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test H=10.56, p=0.39, C=14.29, p=0.16). Customized equations for major areas of the world were computed and demonstrate a good overall goodness-of-fit. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 admission score is able to predict vital status at hospital discharge with use of data recorded at ICU admission. Furthermore, SAPS 3 conceptually dissociates evaluation of the individual patient from evaluation of the ICU and thus allows them to be assessed at their respective reference levels.

Acute renal failure increases risk of death after cardiac surgery. However, it is not known whether more subtle changes in renal function might have an impact on outcome. Thus, the association between small serum creatinine changes after surgery and mortality, independent of other established perioperative risk indicators, was analyzed. In a prospective cohort study in 4118 patients who underwent cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery, the effect of changes in serum creatinine within 48 h postoperatively on 30-d mortality was analyzed. Cox regression was used to correct for various established demographic preoperative risk indicators, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative complications. In the 2441 patients in whom serum creatinine decreased, early mortality was 2.6% in contrast to 8.9% in patients with increased postoperative serum creatinine values. Patients with large decreases (DeltaCrea <-0.3 mg/dl) showed a progressively increasing 30-d mortality (16 of 199 [8%]). Mortality was lowest (47 of 2195 [2.1%]) in patients in whom serum creatinine decreased to a maximum of -0.3 mg/dl; mortality increased to 6% in patients in whom serum creatinine remained unchanged or increased up to 0.5 mg/dl. Mortality (65 of 200 [32.5%]) was highest in patients in whom creatinine increased > or =0.5 mg/dl. For all groups, increases in mortality remained significant in multivariate analyses, including postoperative renal replacement therapy. After cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery, 30-d mortality was lowest in patients with a slight postoperative decrease in serum creatinine. Any even minimal increase or profound decrease of serum creatinine was associated with a substantial decrease in survival.

BACKGROUND: Whether to perform valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic but severe aortic stenosis is controversial. Therefore, we studied the natural history of this condition to identify predictors of outcome. METHODS: During 1994, we identified 128 consecutive patients with asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (59 women and 69 men; mean [+/-SD] age, 60+/-18 years; aortic-jet velocity, 5.0+/-0.6 m per second). The patients were prospectively followed until 1998. RESULTS: Follow-up information was available for 126 patients (98 percent) for a mean of 22+/-18 months. Event-free survival, with the end point defined as death (8 patients) or valve replacement necessitated by the development of symptoms (59 patients), was 67+/-5 percent at one year, 56+/-5 percent at two years, and 33+/-5 percent at four years. Five of the six deaths from cardiac disease were preceded by symptoms. According to multivariate analysis, only the extent of aortic-valve calcification was an independent predictor of outcome, whereas age, sex, and the presence or absence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia were not. Event-free survival for patients with no or mild valvular calcification was 92+/-5 percent at one year, 84+/-8 percent at two years, and 75+/-9 percent at four years, as compared with 60+/-6 percent, 47+/-6 percent, and 20+/-5 percent, respectively, for those with moderate or severe calcification. The rate of progression of stenosis, as reflected by the aortic-jet velocity, was significantly higher in patients who had cardiac events (0.45+/-0.38 m per second per year) than those who did not have cardiac events (0.14+/-0.18 m per second per year, P<0.001), and the rate of progression of stenosis provided useful prognostic information. Of the patients with moderately or severely calcified aortic valves whose aortic-jet velocity increased by 0.3 m per second or more within one year, 79 percent underwent surgery or died within two years of the observed increase. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis, it appears to be relatively safe to delay surgery until symptoms develop. However, outcomes vary widely. The presence of moderate or severe valvular calcification, together with a rapid increase in aortic-jet velocity, identifies patients with a very poor prognosis. These patients should be considered for early valve replacement rather than have surgery delayed until symptoms develop.

BACKGROUND: Destruction by oxidation, or oxidative killing, is the most important defense against surgical pathogens and depends on the partial pressure of oxygen in contaminated tissue. An easy method of improving oxygen tension in adequately perfused tissue is to increase the concentration of inspired oxygen. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the supplemental administration of oxygen during the perioperative period decreases the incidence of wound infection. METHODS: We randomly assigned 500 patients undergoing colorectal resection to receive 30 percent or 80 percent inspired oxygen during the operation and for two hours afterward. Anesthetic treatment was standardized, and all patients received prophylactic antibiotic therapy. With use of a double-blind protocol, wounds were evaluated daily until the patient was discharged and then at a clinic visit two weeks after surgery. We considered wounds with culture-positive pus to be infected. The timing of suture removal and the date of discharge were determined by the surgeon, who did not know the patient's treatment-group assignment. RESULTS: Arterial oxygen saturation was normal in both groups; however, the arterial and subcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen was significantly higher in the patients given 80 percent oxygen than in those given 30 percent oxygen. Among the 250 patients who received 80 percent oxygen, 13 (5.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 8.0 percent) had surgical-wound infections, as compared with 28 of the 250 patients given 30 percent oxygen (11.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 7.3 to 15.1 percent; P=0.01). The absolute difference between groups was 6.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 10.8 percent). The duration of hospitalization was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative administration of supplemental oxygen is a practical method of reducing the incidence of surgical-wound infections.

BACKGROUND: Because stent implantation for disease of the superficial femoral artery has been associated with high rates of late clinical failure, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is preferred for endovascular treatment, and stenting is recommended only in the event of suboptimal technical results. We evaluated whether primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol (nickel-titanium) stent yielded anatomical and clinical benefits superior to those afforded by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional secondary stenting. METHODS: We randomly assigned 104 patients who had severe claudication or chronic limb ischemia due to stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral artery to undergo primary stent implantation (51 patients) or angioplasty (53 patients). Restenosis and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) length of the treated segment was 132+/-71 mm in the stent group and 127+/-55 mm in the angioplasty group. Secondary stenting was performed in 17 of 53 patients (32 percent) in the angioplasty group, in most cases because of a suboptimal result after angioplasty. At 6 months, the rate of restenosis on angiography was 24 percent in the stent group and 43 percent in the angioplasty group (P=0.05); at 12 months the rates on duplex ultrasonography were 37 percent and 63 percent, respectively (P=0.01). Patients in the stent group were able to walk significantly farther on a treadmill at 6 and 12 months than those in the angioplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: In the intermediate term, treatment of superficial-femoral-artery disease by primary implantation of a self-expanding nitinol stent yielded results that were superior to those with the currently recommended approach of balloon angioplasty with optional secondary stenting. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00281060.).

Crohn's disease is a heterogeneous entity. Previous attempts of classification have been based primarily on anatomic location and behavior of disease. However, no uniform definition of patient subgroups has yet achieved broad acceptance. The aim of this international Working Party was to develop a simple classification of Crohn's disease based on objective variables. Eight outcome-related variables relevant to Crohn's disease were identified and stepwise evaluated in 413 consecutive cases, a database survey, and by clinical considerations. Allocation of variables was conducted with well-defined Crohn's disease populations from Europe and North America. Cross-table analyses were performed by chi-square testing. Three variables were finally elected: Age at Diagnosis [below 40 years (A1), equal to or above 40 years (A2)], Location [terminal ileum (L1), colon (L2), ileocolon (L3), upper gastrointestinal (L4)], and Behavior [nonstricturing nonpenetrating (B1), stricturing (B2), penetrating (B3)]. The allocation of patients to these 24 subgroups proved feasible and resulted in specific disease clusters. Cross-table analyses revealed associations between Age at Diagnosis and Location, and between Behavior and Location (all p < 0.001). The Vienna classification of Crohn's disease provides distinct definitions to categorize Crohn's patients into 24 subgroups. Operational guidelines should be used for the characterization of patients in clinical trials as well as for correlation of particular phenotypes with putative biologic markers or environmental factors.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is often a sequel of venous thromboembolism with fatal natural history; however, many cases can be cured by pulmonary endarterectomy. The clinical characteristics and current management of patients enrolled in an international CTEPH registry was investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The international registry included 679 newly diagnosed (≤6 months) consecutive patients with CTEPH, from February 2007 until January 2009. Diagnosis was confirmed by right heart catheterization, ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy, computerized tomography, and/or pulmonary angiography. At diagnosis, a median of 14.1 months had passed since first symptoms; 427 patients (62.9%) were considered operable, 247 (36.4%) nonoperable, and 5 (0.7%) had no operability data; 386 patients (56.8%, ranging from 12.0%- 60.9% across countries) underwent surgery. Operable patients did not differ from nonoperable patients relative to symptoms, New York Heart Association class, and hemodynamics. A history of acute pulmonary embolism was reported for 74.8% of patients (77.5% operable, 70.0% nonoperable). Associated conditions included thrombophilic disorder in 31.9% (37.1% operable, 23.5% nonoperable) and splenectomy in 3.4% of patients (1.9% operable, 5.7% nonoperable). At the time of CTEPH diagnosis, 37.7% of patients initiated at least 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension-targeted therapy (28.3% operable, 53.8% nonoperable). Pulmonary endarterectomy was performed with a 4.7% documented mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similarities in clinical presentation, operable and nonoperable CTEPH patients may have distinct associated medical conditions. Operability rates vary considerably across countries, and a substantial number of patients (operable and nonoperable) receive off-label pulmonary arterial hypertension-targeted treatments.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 274 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02632409.).

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 x 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional 1,400 patients after the start of the amended 2 x 2 design, for a total of 2,034 patients. The median PFS was 8.0 months in the pooled XELOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX-4-containing arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93 to 1.16). The median overall survival was 19.8 months with XELOX versus 19.6 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR, 0.99; 97.5% CI, 0.88 to 1.12). FOLFOX-4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX-4. CONCLUSION: XELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for MCRC, and may be considered as a routine treatment option for appropriate patients.

In this report, which is an update of a guideline published in 2002 (Bandelow et al. 2002, World J Biol Psychiatry 3:171), recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are presented. Since the publication of the first version of this guideline, a substantial number of new randomized controlled studies of anxiolytics have been published. In particular, more relapse prevention studies are now available that show sustained efficacy of anxiolytic drugs. The recommendations, developed by the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Task Force for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive and Post-traumatic Stress Disorders, a consensus panel of 30 international experts, are now based on 510 published randomized, placebo- or comparator-controlled clinical studies (RCTs) and 130 open studies and case reports. First-line treatments for these disorders are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and the calcium channel modulator pregabalin. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are equally effective for some disorders, but many are less well tolerated than the SSRIs/SNRIs. In treatment-resistant cases, benzodiazepines may be used when the patient does not have a history of substance abuse disorders. Potential treatment options for patients unresponsive to standard treatments are described in this overview. Although these guidelines focus on medications, non-pharmacological were also considered. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and other variants of behaviour therapy have been sufficiently investigated in controlled studies in patients with anxiety disorders, OCD, and PTSD to support them being recommended either alone or in combination with the above medicines.

OBJECTIVE: Delay of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy is a major contributing factor for poor outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although early therapy has been shown to be particularly effective, there is still uncertainty about the optimal time point of DMARD introduction. We wanted to test if a therapeutic window of opportunity may exist within the first few months of the disease. METHODS: In this case-control parallel-group study, 20 very early RA (VERA) patients with median disease duration of 3 months were age and gender matched to a group of 20 late early RA (LERA) patients with median disease duration of 12 months until first DMARD initiation. Follow-up time was 36 months. Primary outcome measures were the disease activity score (DAS28) and radiological joint destruction using the Larsen method. RESULTS: Already after 3 months of DMARD therapy we found a significant difference of improvement in favour of the VERA patients in the DAS28. This trend continued over the study period. At study end the DAS28 showed an improvement of 2.8+/-1.5 in the VERA vs 1.7+/-1.2 in the LERA group (P(c)<0.05). The Larsen scores showed a statistically significant retardation of progression in the VERA compared with the LERA. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that there is a window of opportunity for highly successful treatment of RA in the first year, and especially within the first 3 months of therapy. Thus, early diagnosis and therapy may be the crucial step in achieving optimal control of disease progression and prognosis in RA.

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urogenital tumours (WHO "Blue Book"), published in 2022, contains significant revisions. This review summarises the most relevant changes for renal, penile, and testicular tumours. In keeping with other volumes in the fifth edition series, the WHO classification of urogenital tumours follows a hierarchical classification and lists tumours by site, category, family, and type. The section "essential and desirable diagnostic criteria" included in the WHO fifth edition represents morphologic diagnostic criteria, combined with immunohistochemistry and relevant molecular tests. The global introduction of massive parallel sequencing will result in a diagnostic shift from morphology to molecular analyses. Therefore, a molecular-driven renal tumour classification has been introduced, taking recent discoveries in renal tumour genomics into account. Such novel molecularly defined epithelial renal tumours include SMARCB1-deficient medullary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFEB-altered RCC, Alk-rearranged RCC, and ELOC-mutated RCC. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC is a novel morphologically defined RCC entity. The diverse morphologic patterns of penile squamous cell carcinomas are grouped as human papillomavirus (HPV) associated and HPV independent, and there is an attempt to simplify the morphologic classification. A new chapter with tumours of the scrotum has been introduced. The main nomenclature of testicular tumours is retained, including the use of the term "germ cell neoplasia in situ" (GCNIS) for the preneoplastic lesion of most germ cell tumours and division from those not derived from GCNIS. Nomenclature changes include replacement of the term "primitive neuroectodermal tumour" by "embryonic neuroectodermal tumour" to separate these tumours clearly from Ewing sarcoma. The term "carcinoid" has been changed to "neuroendocrine tumour", with most examples in the testis now classified as "prepubertal type testicular neuroendocrine tumour".

PurposeTo establish a process to evaluate and standardize a state-of-the-art nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) data.DesignConsensus meeting.ParticipantsAn international panel of retina specialists, imaging and image reading center experts, and ocular pathologists.MethodsDuring several meetings organized under the auspices of the Macula Society, an international study group discussed and codified a set nomenclature framework for classifying the subtypes of neovascular AMD and associated lesion components.Main Outcome MeasuresA consensus classification of neovascular AMD.ResultsThe study group created a standardized working definition of AMD. The components of neovascular AMD were defined and subclassified. Disease consequences of macular neovascularization were delineated.ConclusionsThe framework of a consensus nomenclature system, a definition of AMD, and a delineation of the subtypes of neovascular AMD were developed. Establishing a uniform set of definitions will facilitate comparison of diverse patient groups and different studies. The framework presented is modified and updated readily, processes that are anticipated to occur on a periodic basis. The study group suggests that the consensus standards outlined in this article be used in future reported studies of neovascular AMD and clinical practice. To establish a process to evaluate and standardize a state-of-the-art nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) data. Consensus meeting. An international panel of retina specialists, imaging and image reading center experts, and ocular pathologists. During several meetings organized under the auspices of the Macula Society, an international study group discussed and codified a set nomenclature framework for classifying the subtypes of neovascular AMD and associated lesion components. A consensus classification of neovascular AMD. The study group created a standardized working definition of AMD. The components of neovascular AMD were defined and subclassified. Disease consequences of macular neovascularization were delineated. The framework of a consensus nomenclature system, a definition of AMD, and a delineation of the subtypes of neovascular AMD were developed. Establishing a uniform set of definitions will facilitate comparison of diverse patient groups and different studies. The framework presented is modified and updated readily, processes that are anticipated to occur on a periodic basis. The study group suggests that the consensus standards outlined in this article be used in future reported studies of neovascular AMD and clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: A high plasma level of factor VIII is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the risk of a recurrence of thrombosis after an initial episode of spontaneous venous thromboembolism among patients with high plasma levels of factor VIII. METHODS: We studied 360 patients for an average follow-up period of 30 months after a first episode of venous thromboembolism and discontinuation of oral anticoagulants. Patients who had recurrent or secondary venous thromboembolism, a congenital deficiency of an anticoagulant, the lupus anticoagulant, hyperhomocysteinemia, cancer, or a requirement for long-term treatment with antithrombotic drugs or who were pregnant were excluded. The end point was objectively documented, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Recurrent venous thromboembolism developed in 38 of the 360 patients (10.6 percent). Patients with recurrence had higher mean (+/-SD) plasma levels of factor VIII than those without recurrence (182+/-66 vs. 157+/-54 IU per deciliter, P=0.009). The relative risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was 1.08 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.12; P<0.001) for each increase of 10 IU per deciliter in the plasma level of factor VIII. Among patients with a factor VIII level above the 90th percentile of the values in the study population, the likelihood of recurrence at two years was 37 percent, as compared with a 5 percent likelihood among patients with lower levels (P<0.001). Among patients with plasma factor VIII levels above the 90th percentile, as compared with those with lower levels, the overall relative risk of recurrence was 6.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.0 to 14.8) after adjustment for age, sex, the presence or absence of factor V Leiden or the G20210A prothrombin mutation, and the duration of oral anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high plasma level of factor VIII have an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare tumours, with an estimated unadjusted incidence of around 1/100 000/year [1.Nilsson B. Bümming P. Meis-Kindblom J.M. et al.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era–a population-based study in western Sweden.Cancer. 2005; 103: 821-829Crossref PubMed Scopus (1027) Google Scholar]. This only covers clinically relevant GISTs, since, if investigated, a much higher number of lesions ≤ 1 cm in diameter (microGISTs) can be found at histopathological examination of stomach tissue in middle-aged and elderly individuals. There is a slight prevalence in males. The median age is around 60–65 years, with a wide range. Occurrence in children is very rare. Paediatric GIST represents a clinically and molecularly distinct subset, marked by female predominance, absence of KIT/platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) mutations, frequent mutations or silencing of the four genes that encode the subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex, gastric multicentric location and possible lymph node metastases [2.Pappo A.S. Janeway K.A. Pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009; 23 (vii): 15-34Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (90) Google Scholar]. Some syndromes are linked to GISTs: •The Carney triad syndrome, marked by gastric GISTs, paraganglioma and pulmonary chondromas (these may occur at different ages) [3.Zhang L. Smyrk T.C. Young Jr, W.F. et al.Gastric stromal tumors in Carney triad are different clinically, pathologically, and behaviorally from sporadic gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: findings in 104 cases.Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34: 53-64Crossref PubMed Scopus (167) Google Scholar];•Carney–Stratakis syndrome, marked by a dyad of GIST and paraganglioma [4.Gaal J. Stratakis C.A. Carney J.A. et al.SDHB immunohistochemistry: a useful tool in the diagnosis of Carney–Stratakis and Carney triad gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Mod Pathol. 2011; 24: 147-151Crossref PubMed Scopus (162) Google Scholar, 5.Pasini B. McWhinney S.R. Bei T. et al.Clinical and molecular genetics of patients with the Carney–Stratakis syndrome and germline mutations of the genes coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD.Eur J Hum Genet. 2008; 16: 79-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (363) Google Scholar]; and•Neurofibromatosis type 1(NF1), possibly leading to wild-type (WT), often multicentric GIST, predominantly located in the small bowel [6.Miettinen M. Fetsch J.F. Sobin L.H. Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases.Am J Surg Pathol. 2006; 30: 90-96Crossref PubMed Scopus (377) Google Scholar]. Families with germline autosomal dominant mutations of KIT are an extremely rare finding, presenting with multiple GISTs at an early age, possibly along with other associated features such as pigmented skin macules, urticaria pigmentosa and diffuse hyperplasia of the interstitial cells of Cajal in the gut wall. When small oesophagogastric or duodenal nodules < 2 cm in size are detected, endoscopic biopsy may be difficult and laparoscopic/laparotomic excision may be the only way to make a histological diagnosis. Many of these small nodules, if diagnosed as GISTs, will be either low-risk or entities whose clinical significance remains unclear. Therefore, the standard approach to patients with oesophagogastric or duodenal nodules < 2 cm is endoscopic ultrasound assessment and then follow-up, reserving excision for patients whose tumour increases in size or becomes symptomatic [IV, C]. As an option, the patient can choose to undergo a histological assessment, also depending on age, life expectancy and comorbidities. If follow-up is the choice, an evidence-based, optimal surveillance policy is lacking. A logical approach may be to have a short-term first control (e.g. at 3 months) and then, in the case of no evidence of growth, a more relaxed follow-up schedule may be selected. In a histologically proven small GIST, standard treatment is excision, unless major morbidity is expected. Alternatively, in the case of a likely low-risk GIST on biopsy, the decision can be made with the patient to follow up the lesion. However, an exception is the standard approach to rectal nodules represented by biopsy or excision after endorectal ultrasound assessment and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), regardless of the tumour size and mitotic rate. In fact, the progression risk of a clinically significant GIST at this site is higher, its prognosis is significantly worse compared with most gastric GISTs and the local implications for surgery are more critical. A follow-up policy may be an option, to be discussed with the patient, in the case of small lesions and whenever the surgical risk is particularly high (comorbidities, age, etc.). The standard approach to tumours ≥2 cm in size is biopsy/excision, because they are associated with a higher risk of progression if confirmed as GIST [IV, C]. If there is an abdominal nodule not amenable to endoscopic assessment, laparoscopic/laparotomic excision is the standard approach. If there is a mass, especially if surgery is likely to be a multivisceral resection, multiple core needle biopsies are the standard approach. They should be obtained through endoscopic ultrasound guidance, or through an ultrasound/computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous approach. This may allow the surgeon to plan the best approach according to the histological diagnosis and avoid surgery for diseases which might not benefit (e.g. lymphomas, mesenteric fibromatosis and germ cell tumours). The risk of peritoneal contamination is negligible if the procedure is properly carried out. Moreover, lesions at risk in this regard (e.g. cystic masses) should be biopsied only in specialised centres. Immediate laparoscopic/laparotomic excision is an option on an individualised basis, especially if surgery is limited. If a patient presents with obvious metastatic disease, a biopsy of the metastatic focus is sufficient and the patient usually does not require a laparotomy for diagnostic purposes. The tumour sample should be fixed in 4% buffered formalin (Bouin fixative should not be used, since it prevents molecular analysis). Pathologically, the diagnosis of GIST relies on morphology and immunohistochemistry, the latter being positive for CD117 (KIT) and/or DOG1 (see Table 1) [7.Rubin B.P. Blanke C.D. Demetri G.D. et al.Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010; 134: 165-170Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 8.Novelli M. Rossi S. Rodriguez-Justo M. et al.DOG1 and CD117 are the antibodies of choice in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.Histopathology. 2010; 57: 259-270Crossref PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar]. A proportion of GISTs (in the range of 5%) are CD117-negative. The mitotic count has a prognostic value and should be expressed as the number of mitoses on a total area of 5 mm2 [which replaces the former 50 high-power field (HPF) area]. Mutational analysis for known mutations involving KIT and PDGFRA can confirm the diagnosis of GIST, if doubtful (particularly in rare CD117/DOG1-negative suspect GIST). Mutational analysis has a predictive value for sensitivity to molecular-targeted therapy and to prognostic value. Its inclusion in the diagnostic work-up of all GISTs should be considered standard practice [II, A] (with the possible exclusion of < 2 cm non-rectal GISTs, which are very unlikely ever to be candidates for medical treatment). Centralisation of mutational analysis in a laboratory enrolled in an external quality assurance programme and with expertise in the may be diagnosis is more for GIST, to confirm the diagnosis of GIST with an at a In GIST, for is to In GIST an syndrome should be Rossi S. M. et GIST is a for neurofibromatosis type 1 PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The of tissue is to allow molecular to be made at a for tumour to local and should be and for medical treatment or for medical treatment for medical treatment of of growth factor succinate in a of of growth factor succinate treatment is involving medical as as as should be carried in for and GISTs and/or expertise and a high number of patients The for node and of tumours the prognostic in GIST (see Table of for GIST from of of of to of KIT site in KIT or PDGFRA of and gastrointestinal stromal neurofibromatosis type growth factor tumour for from of with from in a GIST, gastrointestinal stromal neurofibromatosis type growth factor tumour for from of with from are the mitotic tumour size and tumour site GISTs have a prognosis small bowel or rectal is an prognostic factor and should be regardless of it or Mutational has not in risk at have a distinct GISTs have clinical and GIST with are associated with a prognosis and to risk have A risk by the of which the mitotic tumour size and tumour the prognostic in GISTs M. Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: on molecular and Pathol Lab Med. 2006; PubMed Google Scholar, M. Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: and prognosis at different Pathol. 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. A all has on M. et and of a prognostic for after surgical of gastrointestinal stromal a 2009; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. When these it is to that the mitotic and tumour size are that are through a of of GIST patients not with which the mitotic and tumour size as tumour is considered in to tumour site J. et of of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after an analysis of population-based Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. They have a that most the and the abdominal and pelvic is the of choice for and may be an rectal GISTs, and laboratory the work-up of the The of an tomography or is useful early of the tumour to molecular-targeted therapy is of The standard treatment of GISTs is surgical excision of the with no of clinically lymph If excision is the to follow the of surgery A] et of and surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal Google Scholar]. A approach is in patients have tumours, because of the risk of tumour which is associated with a very high risk of excision is the an excision whose are of tumour When surgery major and medical treatment is not the decision can be made with the patient to possible [IV, This is more for low-risk the of that surgery is associated with a worse If excision carried may be an option, the site of can be and major are not The risk of can be as by risk treatment with for 3 associated with a and in with 1 of therapy in patients in a M. et for stromal analysis of a Clin 34: PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar]. a that for a of 1 can in GISTs a diameter 3 cm with a et mesylate after of gastrointestinal stromal a 2009; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. Therefore, therapy with for 3 is the standard treatment for patients with a significant risk of A is the risk is T. et treatment of GIST with or A on of the and the the the on GIST, the and the J 2009; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. clinical are to of therapy in The benefit associated of may according to the type of being in patients with KIT mutations et of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors with an analysis of a clinical PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et and molecular features with after therapy of stromal the Clin PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. Mutational analysis is to make a clinical decision There is a that PDGFRA GISTs should not be with the of sensitivity of this in and in [IV, the the of a higher of in the case of an KIT in GIST, to this in the for this [II, M. et mutations and for in patients with gastrointestinal stromal J 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et of and clinical in the North of mesylate for treatment of gastrointestinal stromal by and and Clin 2008; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Demetri G.D. et mutations and in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal Clin PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. may this which is not in the by regard to GIST, there is a on treatment in and GISTs [IV, This of sensitivity to and other in the as as which is often more of to sufficient and be to best in the rare In case of tumour at the of there is of tumour cells the peritoneal peritoneal can be to This the patient at a very high risk of peritoneal P. et of in patients with gastrointestinal stromal J 2010; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. Therefore, these patients should be considered for therapy [IV, The optimal of treatment in these is the these cells should be considered as If surgery is not or it be through surgery in the case of total and all other major with is standard A] J. Blanke C.D. et of mesylate for and gastrointestinal stromal early of Surg 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, P. P. et in gastrointestinal stromal tumors the Surg PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. This may also be the case if the surgeon that the surgical is after (e.g. the risk of and tumour is A may be the of mitotic for risk for A biopsy with histological and mutational is to confirm the histological to to therapy with (e.g. PDGFRA and to the for KIT tumour after surgery is carried out. tumour assessment is to avoid surgery in the case of imaging it possible to the tumour very a particularly in the absence of mutational There are to the on to treatment it can be a or surgery and can be the patient from is the standard treatment for and metastatic A] C.D. Demetri G.D. M. et from a of mesylate for patients with or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors Clin 2008; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C.D. Demetri G.D. et mesylate at in patients with or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors the Clin 2008; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. J. et in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. et of patients with stromal tumours to a of after progression on J 2005; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google as as for patients with not is also the standard treatment for patients with metastatic have all lesions surgery is not as a approach in the metastatic The standard of is However, have that patients with tumours the KIT have significantly on a higher which is as standard treatment in this of of for the treatment of or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a of Clin 2010; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. with a PDGFRA are to S. et al.Clinical and treatment in a of PDGFRA gastrointestinal stromal tumour J Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google and other and candidates for clinical on this is doubtful patients with GIST benefit from there are of of K.A. et treatment in patients with GIST of 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. In the metastatic treatment with should be since treatment is by tumour lesions have A] et of in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours after 3 of an 3 2010; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. When treatment is the patient should be to the of with as as with and and the best to should be by of and a policy of and should be in the case of that of are associated with a worse a with the has G.D. et are with clinical benefit in patients with gastrointestinal stromal Clin 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. from its to the assessment of may be useful in the case patients that at a risk of major or patients with surgical to and progression on to the to the to of the tumour should be carried in the early of should be the since the risk of progression excision of metastatic has to be associated with a the patient is to it has this is to surgery or to patient J. et surgery in is it in all 2010; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. J. et of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with therapy Clin 2006; 24: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Blanke C.D. et of mesylate for and gastrointestinal stromal tumors: follow-up of Surg PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. P. P. et follow-up of patients with GIST in the of analysis of prognostic J Surg Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. not early because of for a small positive in which all patients peritoneal et there a of surgery in patients with or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours to a in J Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. the surgical option should be individualised after the decision with the patient in the case of C]. excision of has not in surgery of such as the a has associated with a in the range as for treatment with Therefore, this may be a option for an patient with [IV, C]. (e.g. local such as or may be selected. In the case of tumour progression on an option may be to the to with the exception of mutations with the C.D. Demetri G.D. M. et from a of mesylate for patients with or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors Clin 2008; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C.D. Demetri G.D. et mesylate at in patients with or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors the Clin 2008; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. J. et in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. et of patients with stromal tumours to a of after progression on J 2005; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. is particularly useful in the case of a KIT GIST a higher not from the possibly in the case of in or in the case of molecular progression on imaging should be to the (see patient should be as a possible of tumour as as with In the case of confirmed progression or rare on to through and possibly standard treatment is A] G.D. et and of in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour after of a 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The in of a have that a with a is and no has carried a clinical S. et al.Clinical of of in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour after J 2009; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. This schedule be considered an option on an individualised C]. confirmed progression on a that at the of for 3 of can significantly This as it becomes is standard therapy for patients on or to to and A] G.D. P. et and of for gastrointestinal stromal tumours after of and an 3 Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. with a metastatic GIST should be considered for in clinical of or There is evidence that patients have on may benefit with the et of to control metastatic or gastrointestinal stromal tumours after of and a 3 Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. there is evidence that a treatment with a in the case of disease, may progression as to it no other option is at the at in a proportion of patients with a Therefore, or of treatment progression with to which the patient has is an option [II, the other the of of of clinical should be because of the for have in in with of in only a of total is complex, and early in should be confirmed by an tumour in most patients may only in tumour on or these may tumour in tumour should be considered as the tumour an in the tumour size may be of the tumour if the tumour on is et of tomography and tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal at a with of tomography Clin PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The of lesions also be to the of Therefore, tumour size and tumour on or in or should be considered as for tumour has proven to be in early assessment of tumour and may be useful in there is or early of the is particularly useful (e.g. S. et of in gastrointestinal stromal patients with Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. However, a small proportion of GISTs have no The absence of tumour progression after of treatment is also considered as tumour M. J. et of progression as by in tumors in stromal tumors with the Clin 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. the other tumour progression may not be by in the tumour In fact, in the tumour tumour lesions may be of tumour A progression is the the by which a of a becomes S. J. et al.Gastrointestinal stromal of after to 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. There are no to the optimal follow-up policy of patients with occur more often to the and/or of lesions and other may be rare along the of metastatic with of The mitotic likely the at which assessment on the mitotic tumour size and tumour site may be useful in the follow-up patients have a from the of patients may have a this is much follow-up The optimal follow-up are not As an in patients undergo a follow-up with an abdominal or for 3 therapy (with a clinical follow-up to the to the of unless then on of therapy 3 for 2 years, then 5 from and for an 5 low-risk tumours, the of a follow-up is not if this may be carried with abdominal or for 5 low-risk GISTs not require follow-up, the risk is not is a factor to especially in low-risk GIST, with abdominal being an L. P. et of a follow-up in patients by gastrointestinal stromal J Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. have by in with the for rare in with the standard for They are to the standard approach to treatment and on and are to to the according to the of are represented by the of the and by all to the of considered to be are as may be to the patient as for a decision in of as as evidence not is the the of disease, and are to the the The relevant has by the A of is in Table of evidence and of have the in Table considered standard clinical practice by the of and ultrasound assessment and then follow-up is the standard approach for patients with oesophagogastric or duodenal nodules < 2 cm [IV, is the standard approach to tumours 2 cm in size [IV, analysis inclusion in the diagnostic work-up of all GISTs should be considered standard practice [II, A] (with the possible exclusion of < 2 cm non-rectal of standard treatment of GISTs is surgical excision of the with no of clinically lymph excision is the to follow the of surgery surgery major and medical treatment is not the decision can be made with the patient to possible [IV, therapy with for 3 is the standard treatment of patients with a significant risk of GISTs should not be with [IV, treatment should be in and GISTs [IV, at a very high risk of peritoneal (in case of tumour at the of should be considered for therapy [IV, surgery with no major is not with is standard of is the standard treatment of and metastatic is also the standard treatment for patients with metastatic have all lesions surgery is not as a approach in the metastatic The standard of is treatment of patients with KIT is of the metastatic treatment with should be unless or patient to of metastatic should be individualised after the decision with the patient in the case of excision of should be considered for an patient with [IV, the case of tumour progression on of the can be to (with the exception of the case of confirmed progression or rare on standard treatment is at the of for 3 of is the standard therapy for patients on or to to and or of treatment progression with to which the patient has is an option [II, gastrointestinal stromal neurofibromatosis type growth factor no succinate in a Table of evidence and of from the of of the of of from at of quality for or of or with a of or of such or of with or control case of evidence for with a clinical or evidence for with a clinical evidence for or benefit does not the risk or the evidence or for not evidence or for of the of C.A. of the for cell PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. in a GIST, gastrointestinal stromal neurofibromatosis type growth factor no succinate has for from and by has from has or from and has for and and by and has and from and and from has from and has for and has from and and and from and has for and being a of the for and from and is a of the for and has for and has by has in for and has by has and from and has from and has from and has for from and from and and from and from and has from and has with in with and has from and to clinical has by and and has and from and has with and in and is a for and has from for has being a for for the of a tumour has from and and for has from and has from and has on for and and has from has on for and and has from and has for from and has as a of for has from has or for is a of of has from and has from has from and from and from and has for and has from has and/or from and has and from and has from and for or and have no of and have not of to stromal for treatment and of Oncol PDF