Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos
Hospital / health systemVilnius, Lithuania
Research output, citation impact, and the most-cited recent papers from Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos (Lithuania). Aggregated across the NobleBlocks index of 300M+ scholarly works.
Top-cited papers from Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS: Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (Greece), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Serap Erdine (Turkey), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Slavomira Filipova (Slovak Republic), Anthony Heagerty (UK), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Dagmara Hering (Poland), Sang Hyun Ihm (South Korea), Uday Jadhav (India), Manolis Kallistratos (Greece), Kazuomi Kario (Japan), Vasilios Kotsis (Greece), Adi Leiba (Israel), Patricio López-Jaramillo (Colombia), Hans-Peter Marti (Norway), Terry McCormack (UK), Paolo Mulatero (Italy), Dike B. Ojji (Nigeria), Sungha Park (South Korea), Priit Pauklin (Estonia), Sabine Perl (Austria), Arman Postadzhian (Bulgaria), Aleksander Prejbisz (Poland), Venkata Ram (India), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina), Markus Schlaich (Australia), Alta Schutte (Australia), Cristina Sierra (Spain), Sekib Sokolovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Jonas Spaak (Sweden), Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios (Greece), Bruno Trimarco (Italy), Thomas Unger (The Netherlands), Bert-Jan van den Born (The Netherlands), Anna Vachulova (Slovak Republic), Agostino Virdis (Italy), Jiguang Wang (China), Ulrich Wenzel (Germany), Paul Whelton (USA), Jiri Widimsky (Czech Republic), Jacek Wolf (Poland), Grégoire Wuerzner (Switzerland), Eugene Yang (USA), Yuqing Zhang (China).
Introduction: Intravenous(IV) immunoglobulin(Ig) treatment is known to alleviate behavioral deficits in the experimentally induced model of sepsis. To delineate the mechanisms by which IVIg treatment prevents neuronal dysfunction, an array of immunological and apoptosis markers was investigated. Methods: Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation perforation(CLP) in rats. The animals were divided into five groups; sham, control, CLP + saline, CLP + immunoglobulin G IgG(250 mg/kg,iv), and CLP + immunoglobulins enriched with immunoglobulin M-IgGAM(250 mg/kg,iv). Blood and brain samples were taken in two sets of experiments after CLP to see the early(24 hrs) and late(10 days) effects of treatment. Total complement activity, complement 3(C3) and soluble complement C5b-9 levels were measured in sera of rats using ELISA-based methods. Cerebral complement content was analyzed by Western Blot. Immune cell infiltration and gliosis were examined by immunohistochemistry using cluster of differentiation 3, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD19 and glial fibrillary acidic protein antibodies. Apoptotic neuronal death was investigated by TUNEL staining and Western Blot-based semi-quantitative evaluation of brain homogenates by bax and bcl-2 antibodies. Results: IV IgG and IgGAM administration significantly reduced systemic complement activity but increased serum C3 and soluble C5b-9 levels. Likewise, Western Blot data showed slightly increased C5b-9 expression and significantly reduced C1q expression in brain samples of IgGAM-treated but not IgG-treated septic rats especially in the first day of administration. No cerebral cellular infiltrates were observed in treated and non-treated septic rats. By contrast, IV IgG and IgGAM treatment induced considerable amelioration in glial cell proliferation which was increased in non-treated rats. IgG and IgGAM treated rats exhibited significantly reduced numbers of apoptotic neurons and cerebral expression levels of bax and bcl-2 as compared to nontreated rats. Conclusions: We suggest that IV IgG and IgGAM administration ameliorates neuronal dysfunction and behavioral deficits by reducing apoptotic cell death and glial cell proliferation. IgGAM treatment might be suppressing classical complement pathway by reducing C1q expression.
Nasty/Rzany An evidence-based guideline has been defined as 'a systematically developed statement that assists clinicians and patients in making decisions about appropriate treatment for a specific condition'.1 A guideline will never encompass therapy specifications for all medical decision-making situations. Deviation from the recommendations may, therefore, be justified in specific situations. This is not a textbook on acne, nor a complete, all-inclusive reference on all aspects important to the treatment of acne. The presentation on safety in particular is limited to the information available in the included clinical trials and does not represent all the available and necessary information for the treatment of patients. Additional consultation of specific sources of information on the particular intervention prescribed (e.g. product information sheet) is necessary. Furthermore, all patients should be informed about the specific risks associated with any given topical and/or systemic therapy. Readers must carefully check the information in this guideline and determine whether the recommendations contained therein (e.g. regarding dose, dosing regimens, contraindications, or drug interactions) are complete, correct, and up-to-date. The authors and publishers can take no responsibility for dosage or treatment decisions. Improvement in the care of acne patients The idea behind this guideline is that recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature and a structured consensus process will improve the quality of acne therapy in general. Personal experiences and traded therapy concepts should be critically evaluated and replaced, if applicable, with the consented therapeutic recommendations. In particular, a correct choice of therapy should be facilitated by presenting the suitable therapy options in a therapy algorithm, taking into account the type of acne and the severity of the disease. Reduction of serious conditions and scarring As a result of the detailed description of systemic therapies for patients with severe acne, reservations about these interventions should be overcome to ensure that patients receive the optimal therapy. With the timely introduction of sufficient therapies, the development of serious post-acne conditions and severe scarring should be reduced. Promotion of adherence Good therapeutic adherence is key to treatment success. Adherence is facilitated by knowledge of the product being used, for example treatment duration, the expected onset of effect, the sequence of the healing process, the maximal achievable average effect, expected adverse events and the benefit to quality of life. Reduction of antibiotic resistance The use of topical and systemic antibiotics should be optimized by using appropriate combinations for a predefined duration, to reduce the development of antibiotic resistance. Health care professionals This guideline has been developed to help health care professionals provide optimal therapy to patients with mild, moderate or severe acne. The primary target groups are dermatologists and other professionals involved in the treatment of acne, such as paediatricians and general practitioners. The target group may vary with respect to national differences in the distribution of services provided by specialists or general practitioners. Patients The recommendations of the guideline refer to patients who suffer from acne. These are mainly adolescents treated in outpatient clinics. The appropriate therapy option is presented according to the type of acne that is present. The primary focus is the induction therapy of facial acne (see Chapter 1.6). Non-primary target groups are patients with special forms of acne, such as, occupational acne, chloracne, acne aestivalis, acne neonatorum, acne inverse (hidradenitis suppurativa). European guidelines are intended for adaptation to national conditions. It is beyond the scope of this guideline to take into consideration the specific costs and reimbursement situations in every European country. Differences in prices, reimbursement systems, willingness and ability to pay for medication among patients and the availability of generics are too large. Therefore, pharmacoeconomic considerations will have to be taken into account when guidelines are developed at national and local levels. The personal financial and health insurance situation of a patient may necessitate amendments to the prioritization of treatment recommendations. However, if financial resources allow, the suggested ranking in the therapeutic algorithm should be pursued. The skin type and stage of disease has to be taken into consideration when choosing the vehicle for topical treatments. The efficacy and safety/tolerability of topical treatments are largely influenced by the choice of vehicle. The face is the primary region of interest for the treatment of acne. Appearance, scarring, quality of life and social stigmatization are important considerations when dealing with facial dermatological diseases. The recommendations of this guideline apply primarily to the treatment of facial acne. More widespread involvement will certainly favour earlier use of a systemic treatment due to the efficacy and practicability of such treatments. Layton/Finlay Acne (synonym 'acne vulgaris') is a polymorphic, inflammatory skin disease most commonly affecting the face (99% of cases). Less frequently it also affects the back (60%) and chest (15%).2 Seborrhoea is a frequent feature.3 The clinical picture embraces a spectrum of signs, ranging from mild comedonal acne, with or without sparse inflammatory lesions (IL), to aggressive fulminate disease with deep-seated inflammation, nodules and in some cases associated systemic symptoms. Clinically non-inflamed lesions develop from the subclinical microcomedo which is evident on histological examination early in acne development.2 Non-inflamed lesions encompass both open (blackheads) and closed comedones (whiteheads). Comedones frequently have a mid-facial distribution in childhood and, when evident early in the course of the disease, this pattern is indicative of poor prognosis.4 Closed comedones are often inconspicuous with no visible follicular opening. Most patients have a mixture of non-inflammatory (NIL) and inflammatory lesions.5 Inflammatory lesions arise from the microcomedo or from non-inflammatory clinically apparent lesions and may be either superficial or deep.6 Superficial inflammatory lesions include papules and pustules (5 mm or less in diameter). These may evolve into deep pustules or nodules in more severe disease. Inflammatory macules represent regressing lesions that may persist for many weeks and contribute markedly to the general inflammatory appearance.5 Small nodules are defined as firm, inflamed lesions >5 mm diameter, painful by palpation. Nodules are defined as larger than 5 mm, large nodules are >1 cm in size. They may extend deeply and over large areas, frequently resulting in painful lesions, exudative sinus tracts and tissue destruction. Conglobate acne is a rare but severe form of acne found most commonly in adult males with few or no systemic symptoms. Lesions usually occur on the trunk and upper limbs and frequently extend to the buttocks. In contrast to ordinary acne, facial lesions are less common. The condition often presents in the second to third decade of life and may persist into the sixth decade. Conglobate acne is characterized by multiple grouped comedones amidst inflammatory papules, tender, suppurative nodules which commonly coalesce to form sinus tracts. Extensive and disfiguring scarring is frequently a feature. There are several severe and unusual variants or complications of acne as well as other similar diseases. These include acne fulminans, gram-negative folliculitis, rosacea fulminans, vasculitis, mechanical acne, oil/tar acne, chloracne, acne in neonates and infants and late onset, persistent acne, sometimes associated with genetic or iatrogenic endocrinopathies. The current guidelines do not lend themselves to comprehensive management of all these variants. Finlay/Layton Acne can be largely assessed from two perspectives: objective disease activity (based on measurement of visible signs) and quality of life impact. There are other aspects of measurement, such as sebum excretion rate, scarring development or economic impact. There are inherent difficulties in objectively measuring acne. Over 25 different methods have been described7 but there is no consensus as to which should be used. Most methods are non-validated and consequently the results of separate trials cannot be directly compared. There are detailed reviews on this subject by Barratt et al.,8 Witkowski et al.,9 Thiboutot et al.,10 and Gollnick et al.11 Proper lighting, appropriate patient positioning and prior facial skin preparation (gentle shaving for men, removal of make-up for women) are helpful in facilitating accurate assessment. Palpation in addition to visual inspection may also help define lesions more accurately. Many methods for measuring acne have been described, ranging from global assessments to lesion counting.7, 9 Despite a range of methods being used to measure acne in the 1960's and 1970's, it was the Leeds technique12 that dominated acne measurement for the next two decades. The Leeds technique included two methods; the grading technique and the counting technique. The grading technique allocated patients a grade from 0 to 10, with seven subgroups between 0 and 2. Photographic guides illustrating each grade are given, but the importance of palpating lesions is also stressed. The experience on which this system was based stemmed from the pre-isotretinoin era, and acne of the severity described by grades above 2 is now rarely seen. The counting technique involves the direct counting of non-inflamed and inflamed lesions, including superficial papules and pustules, deep inflamed lesions and macules. The revised Leeds acne grading system13 includes numerical grading systems for the back and chest as well as for the face. The Echelle de Cotation des Lesions d'Acne (ECLA) or 'Acne Lesion Score Scale' system has demonstrated good reliability.14 However, ECLA scores do not correlate with quality of life scores and the use of both disease and quality of life scores is suggested.15 Global assessment scales incorporate the entirety of the clinical presentation into a single category of severity. Each category is defined by either a photographic repertoire with corresponding numeric scale or descriptive text. Grading is a subjective task, based on observing dominant lesions, evaluating the presence or absence of inflammation, which is particularly difficult to capture, and estimating the extent of involvement. Global methods are much more practically suited to clinical practice. In clinical investigations, they should be combined with lesion counts as a co-primary endpoint of efficacy.16 A simple photographic standard-based grading method using a 0–8 scale has been successfully employed in a number of clinical trials.17 In 2005, the US FDA proposed an IGA (investigator global assessment) that represented a static quantitative evaluation of overall acne severity. To accomplish this, they devised an ordinal scale with five severity grades, each defined by distinct and clinically relevant morphological descriptions that they hoped would minimize inter-observer variability. Indeed, the more detailed descriptive text has resulted in this system being considered to provide even greater reliability than previous global assessments.16 A very simple classification of acne severity was described in the 2003 report from the Global Alliance for better outcome of acne treatment.11 This basic classification was designed to be used in a routine clinic, and its purpose was to map treatment advice onto common clinical presentations. For each acne descriptor a first-choice therapy is advised, with alternatives for female patients and maintenance therapy. There are five simple descriptors: mild comedonal, mild papulopustular, moderate papulopustular, moderate nodular and severe nodular/conglobate. A series of eight photographs span and overlap these five descriptors. Different facial views and different magnifications are used, reducing the comparability of the images. To give treatment recommendations based on disease activity, the EU Guidelines group has considered how best to classify acne patients. It has used the following simple clinical classification: Comedonal acne Mild–moderate papulopustular acne Severe papulopustular acne, moderate nodular acne Severe nodular acne, conglobate acne Other already existing systems are very difficult to compare with one another. The group has tried to map the existing systems to the guidelines' clinical classification. However, in many cases the systems do not include corresponding categories and often it has to be considered an approximated narrowing rather than a precise mapping (Table 1). Simpson and Cunliffe25'consider the use of quality of life and psychosocial questionnaires essential to adequately understanding just how the disease is affecting the patient, and to better understand the progress of the disease'. The impact of acne on quality of life can be measured using general health measures, dermatology-specific measures or acne-specific measures. In order for quality of life measures to be used more frequently in the routine clinical work, they need to be easy to use, the scores need to be meaningful and they need to be readily accessible. Clinicians must be convinced that the information gained from using them is of benefit in guiding them to make optimum clinical decisions for their patients, and they need to become aware that the use of these measures may help to justify their clinical decisions. Quality of life measures can influence the choice of therapy. In patients with a severe impact on their quality of life, a more aggressive therapy may be justified. A number of prognostic factors relating to more severe disease should be considered when assessing and managing acne. These are outlined and evidenced in review papers published by Holland and Jeremy 200526 and Dreno et al. 200827 and include family history, course of inflammation, persistent or late-onset disease, hyperseborrhoea, androgenic triggers, truncal acne and/or psychological sequelae. Previous infantile acne may also correlate with resurgence of acne at puberty and early age of onset with mid-facial comedones, early and more severe seborrhoea and earlier presentation relative to menarche are all factors that should alert the clinician to increased likelihood of more severe acne. Scarring usually follows deep-seated inflammatory lesions, but may also occur as a result of more superficial inflamed lesions in scar-prone patients. Acne scarring, albeit mild, has been identified in up to 90% of patients attending a dermatology clinic.28 Scars may show increased collagen (hypertrophic and keloid scars) or be associated with collagen loss. The presence of scarring should support aggressive management and therapy should be commenced early in the disease process. (For further details please see the methods report at http://www.acne-guidelines.com.) Nast/Rzany All experts were officially nominated by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) or the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. They were selected according to their clinical expertise, publication record and/or experience in the field of evidence-based medicine and guideline development. None of the experts received any financial incentive other than reimbursement of travel costs. Participation of patients was difficult to realize, since no patient organization exists. Attempts to invite patients currently treated by the involved experts did not succeed. Patients were invited to participate in the external review. Patient preference was considered as an important outcome and trials looking at patient preferences were included. There is a vast array of treatment options available for acne. The options are further extended by the availability of different vehicles and formulations. When choosing a treatment, different skin types, ethnic groups and subtypes of acne must also be considered. The authors of this guideline selected the most relevant treatments in Europe to be included in the guideline. The fact that a certain treatment was not selected as a topic for this guideline, does not mean that it may not be a good treatment for acne. Additional treatment options may be considered for a later update. Fixed-dose combinations were considered as long as they were licensed in a European country (e.g. adapalene + benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin + BPO, erythromycin + tretinoin, erythromycin + isotretinoin, erythromycin + zinc). Treatment options consisting of more than two topical components were not included because of the likeliness of reduced patient adherence and/or because of a limitation in the feasibility of discussing all possible combinations and sequences. An extensive search of existing guidelines and systematic reviews was performed at the beginning of the project. The search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane (for search strategies see the methods report at http://www.acne-guidelines.com). The date of the systematic searches was March 10th 2010 for topical and systemic interventions and April 13th 2010 for laser and light therapies. The results were checked for the inclusion criteria and trial quality using a standardized literature evaluation form. Existing systematic reviews (e.g. Cochrane) and other guidelines served as an additional basis for the body of evidence in this guideline. Pooling of the trials was not attempted due to the lack of common outcome measures and endpoints and the unavailability of some primary data (for details of search strategies, standardized evaluation form and references of included reviews see methods report at http://www.acne-guidelines.com). The aim of this guideline is to give recommendations for specific clinical conditions, e.g. the severity of acne, and not to assess the different medications one by one without respect to clinical stage. However, most trials did not look in detail at subtypes but include patients with 'acne vulgaris' in general. Therefore, for some recommendations, 'indirect evidence' was generated from looking at suitable outcome parameters: The percentage 'reduction of non-inflammatory lesions' was the efficacy parameter considered for comedonal acne. Efficacy in papulopustular acne was assessed by 'reduction in inflammatory lesions', 'reduction in total lesion count' and other acne grading scales. The generation of evidence for nodular/conglobate acne was particularly difficult, since very few trials included nodular/conglobate acne. Consequently, treatment recommendations also took into account indirect data from trials of severe papulopustular acne. The evidence from clinical trials almost always focuses on facial acne. Trials that examined acne at other locations (e.g. back), were considered as indirect evidence and the level of evidence was downgraded accordingly. Very little attention has been given during clinical trials to the question of a minimal clinically important difference from the perspective of the patient. It would be helpful to know the extent of reduction in the number of acne lesions required for patients to consider that there has been a clinically important improvement. One study has been identified that empirically validated a non-inferiority margin of 10–15% for facial acne lesion counts as appropriate.356 The consensus view of the authors of this guideline is that a treatment should achieve at least a 10% greater reduction in the number of lesions to demonstrate superior efficacy. for the evaluation of superior or efficacy the evidence generation process, a 10% difference in efficacy was considered Many different grading systems for assessing the quality of evidence are available in the field of guideline development. For this guideline, the authors used the grading system for the European Guidelines with some taken from the The available literature was evaluated with respect to the quality of each single A grade of evidence was given to every trial clinical trial of quality of patient sufficient clinical trial of quality (e.g. limited at least patients trial with severe (e.g. not very no When looking at a specific question (e.g. efficacy of relative to the available evidence was by a level of evidence using the following is very to in the of least two trials are available that were a grade of evidence A and the results are with the results of additional grade or is to have an important impact on in the of and may the least trials are available that were a grade of evidence and the results are with respect to additional grade is very to have an important impact on in the of and is to the evidence or limited of with a grade of evidence of or of is very or no systematic included trials are limited in number and/or All recommendations were in a consensus of the authors using consensus group The consensus was by who is a for the of All of the were to in the consensus In a consensus was In the absence of a this was in the text and for the difference in views were All consensus are in a the text. To the different recommendations, the group a of grade (see The of considered all aspects of the treatment such as patient preference and the reliability of the existing body of evidence of of To grade the a guidelines' was be be considered. not not be used any A for or treatment cannot be at the An extensive external review was dermatological Dermatology Forum (EDF) other general as in the European of and patients were invited to was open and it was possible for to the the The group the guidelines their and performed a trial their clinics. (For further details see the methods report at will be at a national level by local medical such as an a and a therapeutic algorithm will be for evaluation (e.g. assessment of treatment and patient are in preparation and will be at a national Guidelines need to be to the of medical information This guideline will not be In of important in the licensed of drug important an will be The guidelines the of the of evidence-based medicine will the for an by of a Acne is one of the most frequent skin diseases. in the of acne in adolescents to be between and on the method of lesion mild were and moderate or severe were the was Acne is a disease primarily of It is in by the of by the and and it usually the of However, to some acne may persist beyond in a of particularly the disease has acne and are not factors have been there is a among and there is also a severe acne in patients with a family for little is about specific It is that several are involved in an to acne. These include the for and and ethnic factors may also contribute to differences in the clinical presentation and of factors also to be of to the of with a not to develop In particular, has gained with and a between acne and Acne is an of There are primary which to acne sebum by the in the process, follicular and of inflammatory Patients with seborrhoea and acne have a greater number of with Inflammatory occur prior to the of to the development of comedones of the with A relative has also been are by which in with to and as well as the in by and are also involved in activity as are the such as and The also as an in to in and other can of and a Acne factors and the of and induction by 2 of and of the of which and the The understanding of acne development on a level that acne is a disease that involves both and systems and inflammatory are based on available evidence and evidence and to classification of of (Table one trial at patients with comedonal acne. As a of indirect trials including patients with papulopustular acne were used and the percentage in the reduction of non-inflammatory lesions was considered as the relevant outcome of the general lack of direct evidence for the treatment of comedonal acne, the of was downgraded for all considered treatment with of as a of topical systemic treatment to the usually severity of comedonal acne, a topical therapy is efficacy was defined as a difference of in the reduction of non-inflammatory lesions in (see also Chapter efficacy with is demonstrated and the topical (Table the topical
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) remains a controversial entity. Specific clusters of MetS components - rather than MetS per se - are associated with accelerated arterial ageing and with cardiovascular (CV) events. To investigate whether the distribution of clusters of MetS components differed cross-culturally, we studied 34,821 subjects from 12 cohorts from 10 European countries and one cohort from the USA in the MARE (Metabolic syndrome and Arteries REsearch) Consortium. METHODS: In accordance with the ATP III criteria, MetS was defined as an alteration three or more of the following five components: elevated glucose (G), fasting glucose ≥110 mg/dl; low HDL cholesterol, < 40mg/dl for men or <50 mg/dl for women; high triglycerides (T), ≥150 mg/dl; elevated blood pressure (B), ≥130/≥85 mmHg; abdominal obesity (W), waist circumference >102 cm for men or >88 cm for women. RESULTS: MetS had a 24.3% prevalence (8468 subjects: 23.9% in men vs. 24.6% in women, p < 0.001) with an age-associated increase in its prevalence in all the cohorts. The age-adjusted prevalence of the clusters of MetS components previously associated with greater arterial and CV burden differed across countries (p < 0.0001) and in men and women (p < 0.0001). In details, the cluster TBW was observed in 12% of the subjects with MetS, but was far more common in the cohorts from the UK (32.3%), Sardinia in Italy (19.6%), and Germany (18.5%) and less prevalent in the cohorts from Sweden (1.2%), Spain (2.6%), and the USA (2.5%). The cluster GBW accounted for 12.7% of subjects with MetS with higher occurrence in Southern Europe (Italy, Spain, and Portugal: 31.4, 18.4, and 17.1% respectively) and in Belgium (20.4%), than in Northern Europe (Germany, Sweden, and Lithuania: 7.6, 9.4, and 9.6% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the distribution of MetS suggested that what follows under the common definition of MetS is not a unique entity rather a constellation of cluster of MetS components, likely selectively risky for CV disease, whose occurrence differs across countries.
The aim of the present study is to identify microRNAs (miRs) with high potential to be used as biomarkers in plasma and/or serum to clinically diagnose, or provide accurate prognosis for survival in, patients with atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A systematic search of published original research yielded a total of 72 studies. After review of the risk of bias of the published studies, according to Cochrane Collaboration and the QUADUAS Group standards, 19 studies were selected. Overall 52 different miRs were reported. In particular, miR-133a/b (5 studies), miR-208a/b (6 studies), and miR-499 (7 studies) were well studied and found to be significant diagnostic and/or prognostic markers across different cardiovascular disease progression stages. miR-1 and miR-145b are potential biomarkers of ACS; miR-1 with higher sensitivity for all acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and miR-145 for STEMI and worse outcome of AMI. But when miRs were studied across different ACS study populations, patients had varying degrees of coronary stenosis, which was identified as an important confounder that limited the ability to quantitatively pool the study results. The identified miRs were found to regulate endothelial function and angiogenesis (miR-1, miR-133), vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation (miR-133, miR-145), communication between vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cell to stabilize plaques (miR-145), apoptosis (miR-1, miR-133, miR-499), cardiac myocyte differentiation (miR-1, miR-133, miR-145, miR-208, miR-499), and to repress cardiac hypertrophy (miR-133). Their role in these processes may be explained by regulation of shared RNA targets such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (or p21), ETS proto-oncogene 1, fascin actin-bundling protein 1, hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel 4, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor LIM and SH3 protein 1, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, and transgelin 2. These mechanistic data further support the clinical relevance of the identified miRs. miR-1, miR-133a/b, miR-145, miR-208a/b, and miR-499(a) in plasma and/or serum show some potential for diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. However, biased selection of miRs in most studies and unexplained contrasting results are major limitations of current miR research. Inconsistencies need to be addressed in order to definitively identify clinically useful miRs. Therefore, this paper presents important aspects to improve future miR research, including unbiased selection of miRs, standardization/normalization of reference miRs, adjustment for patient comorbidities and medication, and robust protocols of data-sharing plans that could prevent selective publication and selective reporting of miR research outcomes.
The prevalence and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported in single populations, with the majority of reports focused on White in Europe and North America. The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) has assembled data on 18,435 families with BRCA1 mutations and 11,351 families with BRCA2 mutations ascertained from 69 centers in 49 countries on six continents. This study comprehensively describes the characteristics of the 1,650 unique BRCA1 and 1,731 unique BRCA2 deleterious (disease-associated) mutations identified in the CIMBA database. We observed substantial variation in mutation type and frequency by geographical region and race/ethnicity. In addition to known founder mutations, mutations of relatively high frequency were identified in specific racial/ethnic or geographic groups that may reflect founder mutations and which could be used in targeted (panel) first pass genotyping for specific populations. Knowledge of the population-specific mutational spectrum in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could inform efficient strategies for genetic testing and may justify a more broad-based oncogenetic testing in some populations.
Multimorbidity, which is defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions, has moved onto the priority agenda for many health policymakers and healthcare providers. Patients with multimorbidity are high utilizers of healthcare resources and are some of the most costly and difficult-to-treat patients in Europe. Preventing and improving the way multimorbidity is managed is now a key priority for many countries, and work is at last underway to develop more sustainable models of care. Unfortunately, this effort is being hampered by a lack of basic knowledge about the aetiology, epidemiology, and risk factors for multimorbidity, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different interventions. The European Commission recognizes the need for reform in this area and has committed to raising awareness of multimorbidity, encouraging innovation, optimizing the use of existing resources, and coordinating the efforts of different stakeholders across the European Union. Many countries have now incorporated multimorbidity into their own healthcare strategies and are working to strengthen their prevention efforts and develop more integrated models of care. Although there is some evidence that integrated care for people with multimorbidity can create efficiency gains and improve health outcomes, the evidence is limited, and may only be applicable to high-income countries with relatively strong and well-resourced health systems. In low- to middle-income countries, which are facing the double burden of infectious and chronic diseases, integration of care will require capacity building, better quality services, and a stronger evidence base.
The pathogenesis of acne, a disease of the pilosebaceous follicle and one of the most common chronic skin disorders, is attributed to multiple factors such as increased sebum production, alteration of the quality of sebum lipids, inflammatory processes, dysregulation of the hormone microenvironment, interaction with neuropeptides, follicular hyperkeratinisation and the proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes within the follicle. In particular, the sebaceous gland plays an exquisite role in the initiation of the disease as it possesses all the enzyme machinery for the production of hormones and cytokines. In addition, in response to the altered tissue environment in the pilosebaceous follicle as well as in answer to emotional fret, stress response system mechanisms with induction of central and local expression of neuropeptides, are also initiated. This review summarises the latest advances in understanding the role of sebaceous gland cells in the pathomechanism of acne.
BACKGROUND: This intercontinental study aimed to study gram-negative rod (GNR) resistance in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: GNR bacteremias occurring during 6 months post-HSCT (February 2014-May 2015) were prospectively collected, and analyzed for rates and risk factors for resistance to fluoroquinolones, noncarbapenem anti-Pseudomonas β-lactams (noncarbapenems), carbapenems, and multidrug resistance. RESULTS: Sixty-five HSCT centers from 25 countries in Europe, Australia, and Asia reported data on 655 GNR episodes and 704 pathogens in 591 patients (Enterobacteriaceae, 73%; nonfermentative rods, 24%; and 3% others). Half of GNRs were fluoroquinolone and noncarbapenem resistant; 18.5% carbapenem resistant; 35.2% multidrug resistant. The total resistance rates were higher in allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) vs autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) patients (P < .001) but similar in community-acquired infections. Noncarbapenem resistance and multidrug resistance were higher in auto-HSCT patients in centers providing vs not providing fluoroquinolone prophylaxis (P < .01). Resistance rates were higher in southeast vs northwest Europe and similar in children and adults, excluding higher fluoroquinolone- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor resistance rates in allo-HSCT adults. Non-Klebsiella Enterobacteriaceae were rarely carbapenem resistant. Multivariable analysis revealed resistance risk factors in allo-HSCT patients: fluoroquinolone resistance: adult, prolonged neutropenia, breakthrough on fluoroquinolones; noncarbapenem resistance: hospital-acquired infection, breakthrough on noncarbapenems or other antibiotics (excluding fluoroquinolones, noncarbapenems, carbapenems), donor type; carbapenem resistance: breakthrough on carbapenem, longer hospitalization, intensive care unit, previous other antibiotic therapy; multidrug resistance: longer hospitalization, breakthrough on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, and carbapenems. Inappropriate empiric therapy and mortality were significantly more common in infections caused by resistant bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Our data question the recommendation for fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and call for reassessment of local empiric antibiotic protocols. Knowledge of pathogen-specific resistance enables early appropriate empiric therapy. Monitoring of resistance is crucial. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02257931.
Summary Sample-size determination is often an important step in planning an epidemiological study. There are several approaches to determining sample size. It depends on the type of the study. Descriptive, observational and randomized controlled studies have different formulas to calculate sample size. In this article, we discuss the formulas that can help to estimate sample size in an epidemiological trial. We present a few examples from clinical practice, which may contribute to the understanding of this problem.Keywords: sample size determination Determining an appropriate sample size for a clinical trial is an essential step in the statistical design of the pro-ject. An adequate sample size helps ensure that the stu-dy will yield reliable information, regardless of whether the ultimate data suggest a clinically important difference between the treatments being studied, or the study is in-tended to measure the accuracy of a diagnostic test or the incidence of a disease. Unfortunately, many studies pub-lished in medical literature are conducted with inadequate sample sizes, making the interpretation of negative results difficult.Conductingastudywithaninadequatesamplesize is not only futile, it is also unethical. Exposing pa-tients to the risks inherent in a research is justifiableon-ly if there is a realistic possibility that the results will be-nefitthosesubjects,futuresubjects,orleadtosubstantialscientificprogress.How many individuals will I need to study? This ques-tion iscommonly asked by a clinical investigator and ex-poses oneof many issues that are best to be settled before actually carryingout a study. Consultation with a statisti-cian is worthwhilein addressing many issues of study de-sign, but a statisticianis not always readily available.Sample Size (n) is the number of individuals in a group under study. The larger the sample size, the grea-ter the precision and, thus, power for a given study de-sign to detect an effect of a given size. For statisticians, an n > 30 is usually sufficientfortheCentralLimitTheo-rem to hold so that normal theory approximations can be used for measures such as the standard error of the mean. However, this sample size (n = 30) is unrelated to the cli-nicians’ objective of detecting biologically significantef-fects, which determines the specificsamplesizeneededfor a specificstudy[1].
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery, with an increasing incidence. Post-operative AF results in many complications and increased healthcare resources. Despite substantial interest in the prediction and prevention of post-operative AF, as well as guidelines for the management of this common arrhythmia, there is still some uncertainty about appropriate risk stratification and management. The aim of this review article is to provide an overview of clinical predictive features for the development of AF following cardiac surgery and suitable preventive measures, using both antiarrhythmic and non-antiarrhythmic strategies.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that countries implement pharmacovigilance and collect information on active drug safety monitoring (aDSM) and management of adverse events. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of adverse events to anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs in a cohort of consecutive TB patients treated with new ( i.e. bedaquiline, delamanid) and repurposed ( i.e. clofazimine, linezolid) drugs, based on the WHO aDSM project. Adverse events were collected prospectively after attribution to a specific drug together with demographic, bacteriological, radiological and clinical information at diagnosis and during therapy. This interim analysis included patients who completed or were still on treatment at time of data collection. Globally, 45 centres from 26 countries/regions reported 658 patients (68.7% male, 4.4% HIV co-infected) treated as follows: 87.7% with bedaquiline, 18.4% with delamanid (6.1% with both), 81.5% with linezolid and 32.4% with clofazimine. Overall, 504 adverse event episodes were reported: 447 (88.7%) were classified as minor (grade 1–2) and 57 (11.3%) as serious (grade 3–5). The majority of the 57 serious adverse events reported by 55 patients (51 out of 57, 89.5%) ultimately resolved. Among patients reporting serious adverse events, some drugs held responsible were discontinued: bedaquiline in 0.35% (two out of 577), delamanid in 0.8% (one out of 121), linezolid in 1.9% (10 out of 536) and clofazimine in 1.4% (three out of 213) of patients. Serious adverse events were reported in 6.9% (nine out of 131) of patients treated with amikacin, 0.4% (one out of 221) with ethionamide/prothionamide, 2.8% (15 out of 536) with linezolid and 1.8% (eight out of 498) with cycloserine/terizidone. The aDSM study provided valuable information, but implementation needs scaling-up to support patient-centred care.
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the leading causes of vaginal complaints among women of childbearing age. The role of Gardnerella vaginalis remains controversial due to its presence in healthy and BV-type vaginal microflora. The phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of G. vaginalis suggested the existence of strain variants linked with different health conditions. We sought to analyze prevalence and distribution of G. vaginalis subgroups (clades) in BV-positive (n = 29), partial BV (n = 27), and BV-negative (n = 53) vaginal samples from Lithuanian women. METHODS: Vaginal samples were characterized by Amsel criteria and the Nugent method. Bacterial signatures characteristic of BV and concomitant infections were identified by culture and PCR. Using singleplex PCR assays, G. vaginalis subgroups were identified in 109 noncultured vaginal specimens by targeting clade-specific genes. Isolated G. vaginalis clinical strains were subtyped and the presence of the sialidase coding gene was detected by PCR. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software. RESULTS: G. vaginalis was found in 87% of women without BV. Clade 4 was most frequently detected (79.4%), followed by clade 1 (63.7%), clade 2 (42.2%), and clade 3 (15.7%). Multi-clade G. vaginalis communities showed a positive association with Nugent score (NS) ≥ 4 (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.48-8.91; p = 0.005). Clade 1 and clade 2 were statistically significantly more common in samples with NS 7-10 (OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.38-15.88; p = 0.01 and OR 6.26; 95% CI 2.20-17.81; p ≤ 0.001, respectively). Clade 3 and clade 4 showed no association with high NS (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.26-3.04; p = 1.00 and OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.39-4.41; p = 0.767, respectively). The gene coding for sialidase was detected in all isolates of clade 1 and clade 2, but not in clade 4 isolates. CONCLUSIONS: We showed an association between the microbial state of vaginal microflora and specific subgroups of G. vaginalis, the distribution of which may determine the clinical manifestation of BV. The frequent detection of clade 4 in the BV-negative samples might be due its lack of the gene coding for sialidase.
Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a prodrug that is converted to pyrazinoic acid by the enzyme pyrazinamidase, encoded by the pncA gene in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Molecular identification of mutations in pncA offers the potential for rapid detection of pyrazinamide resistance (PZA(r)). However, the genetic variants are highly variable and scattered over the full length of pncA, complicating the development of a molecular test. We performed a large multicenter study assessing pncA sequence variations in 1,950 clinical isolates, including 1,142 multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and 483 fully susceptible strains. The results of pncA sequencing were correlated with phenotype, enzymatic activity, and structural and phylogenetic data. We identified 280 genetic variants which were divided into four classes: (i) very high confidence resistance mutations that were found only in PZA(r) strains (85%), (ii) high-confidence resistance mutations found in more than 70% of PZA(r) strains, (iii) mutations with an unclear role found in less than 70% of PZA(r) strains, and (iv) mutations not associated with phenotypic resistance (10%). Any future molecular diagnostic assay should be able to target and identify at least the very high and high-confidence genetic variant markers of PZA(r); the diagnostic accuracy of such an assay would be in the range of 89.5 to 98.8%. Importance: Conventional phenotypic testing for pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is technically challenging and often unreliable. The development of a molecular assay for detecting pyrazinamide resistance would be a breakthrough, directly overcoming both the limitations of conventional testing and its related biosafety issues. Although the main mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance involves mutations inactivating the pncA enzyme, the highly diverse genetic variants scattered over the full length of the pncA gene and the lack of a reliable phenotypic gold standard hamper the development of molecular diagnostic assays. By analyzing a large number of strains collected worldwide, we have classified the different genetic variants based on their predictive value for resistance which should lead to more rapid diagnostic tests. This would assist clinicians in improving treatment regimens for patients.
BACKGROUND: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. METHODS: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. RESULTS: A total of 2846 (46%) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19%) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35%) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60%, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54% and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28%. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53% and 11% of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0% (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69% reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (≈40 %) and only 27% of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: The sebaceous gland exhibits an independent peripheral endocrine function and expresses receptors for neuropeptides. Previous reports have confirmed the presence of a complete corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) system in human sebocytes in vitro. The capability of hypothalamic CRH to induce lipid synthesis, induce steroidogenesis and interact with testosterone and growth hormone implicates a possibility of its involvement in the clinical development of acne. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to detect expression changes of CRH/CRH binding protein (CRHBP)/CRH receptors (CRHRs) in acne-involved skin, especially in the sebaceous glands. METHODS: Expression of CRH/CRHBP/CRHRs was analysed by immunohistochemistry in biopsies from facial skin of 33 patients with acne, noninvolved thigh skin of the same patients and normal skin of eight age-matched healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Very strong positive reaction for CRH was observed in acne-involved skin in all types of sebaceous gland cells, irrespective of their differentiation stage, whereas in noninvolved and normal skin sebaceous glands exhibited a weaker CRH staining depending upon the differentiation stage of sebocytes. The strongest reaction for CRHBP in acne-involved sebaceous glands was in differentiating sebocytes. CRHR-1 and CRHR-2 exhibited the strongest expression in sweat glands and sebaceous glands, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of the complete CRH system is abundant in acne-involved skin, especially in the sebaceous glands, possibly activating pathways which affect immune and inflammatory processes leading to the development and stress-induced exacerbation of acne.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is poorer in adults than in children. Studies have indicated that young adults benefit from pediatric treatment, although no upper age limit has been defined. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed 749 patients aged 1-45 yr treated by the NOPHO ALL-2008 protocol. Minimal residual disease (MRD) on days 29 and 79, immunophenotype, white blood cell count (WBC), and cytogenetics were used to stratify patients to standard-, intermediate-, or high-risk treatment with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Adults aged 18-45 had significantly lower WBCs at diagnosis compared with children aged 1-9 and 10-17 yr, but significantly more adults were stratified to high-risk chemotherapy (8%, 14%, 17%; P < 0.0001) or high-risk chemotherapy with transplantation (4%, 13%, 19%; P < 0.0001). This age-dependent skewing of risk grouping reflected more T-ALL (11%, 27%, 33%, P < 0.0001), poorer MRD response day 29 (MRD < 0.1%: 75%, 61%, 52%; P < 0.0001), and more MLL gene rearrangements (3%, 3%, 10%; P = 0.005) in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Even if identical diagnostics, treatment, and risk stratification are implemented, more adults will be stratified to high-risk therapy, which should be considered when comparing pediatric and adult outcomes.
Hirschsprung disease, or congenital aganglionic megacolon, is a genetic disorder of neural crest development affecting 1:5,000 newborns. Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene, repeatedly identified in the heterozygous state in both long- and short-segment Hirschsprung patients, lead to loss of both transforming and differentiating capacities of the activated RET through a dominant negative effect when expressed in appropriate cellular systems. The approach of single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis established for all the 20 exons of the RET proto-oncogene, and previously used to screen for point mutations in Hirschsprung patients allowed us to identify seven additional mutations among 39 sporadic and familial cases of Hirschsprung disease (detection rate 18%). This relatively low efficiency in detecting mutations of RET in Hirschsprung patients cannot be accounted by the hypothesis of genetic heterogeneity, which is not supported by the results of linkage analysis in the pedigrees analyzed so far. Almost 74% of the point mutations in our series, as well as in other patient series, were identified among long segment patients, who represented only 25% of our patient population. The finding of a C620R substitution in a patient affected with total colonic aganglionosis confirms the involvement of this mutation in the pathogenesis of different phenotypes (i.e., medullary thyroid carcinoma and Hirschsprung). Finally the R313Q mutation identified for the first time in homozygosity in a child born of consanguineous parents is associated with the most severe Hirschsprung phenotype (total colonic aganglionosis with small bowel involvement).
OBJECTIVE: Arterial ageing is characterized by increasing arterial stiffness as measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV). This process is enhanced in participants with early vascular ageing (EVA), but slowed in participants with healthy vascular ageing (HVA). We aimed to describe characteristics of EVA and HVA in a transcontinental study including 11 cohorts. METHODS: In all, 18 490 participants from the global MARE Consortium, free of cardiovascular disease, participated with data on PWV and cardiometabolic risk factors. We defined HVA as the lowest 10% and EVA as the highest 10% of the standardized PWV distribution, adjusted for age intervals. HVA individuals were compared with the 90% of non-HVA individuals with ANCOVA, adjusted for age, sex and hypertension. RESULTS: The 1723 HVA participants were at the same age as the rest of the population, more likely women (59.4 vs 57.0%), and with significantly lower levels of established cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, glucose). Similarly, the prevalence rate of obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and the metabolic syndrome was lower in the HVA participants. In the presence of similar levels of cardiovascular risk factors, HVA participants in the 50-64 years of age group presented lower PWV 5.8 (SD 0.5) vs. 7.4 (1.4) m/s (P < 0.0001) than control individuals in the 35-49 years of age group, corresponding to an estimated difference in chronological age of 14 years. CONCLUSION: Participants with healthy vascular ageing (HVA), belonging to the lowest end of the PWV distribution, are in general characterized by an up to 14 years estimated younger biological (vascular) age than those with higher PWV values, and have lower levels of risk factors.
Abstract: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT), a common complication of end stage liver disease, is no longer considered a definite contraindication for liver transplantation (LTx). The clinical decision to perform an LTx in the case of PVT depends on the degree of PVT and the experience of the surgeon. Eversion thromboendovenectomy was suggested by most authors as the surgical technique of choice for PVT grade 1, 2, and 3. If PVT obstructs more extended parts of the porto‐mesenteric venous circulation, surgical options would include different types of venous jump graft reconstructions or arterialization of the portal vein. Combined liver and small bowel transplantation is another possible alternative. Cavoportal hemitransposition (CPHT) and renoportal anastomosis (RPA) were recently particularly advocated as creative surgical strategies in case of diffuse PVT. In this work, we focus on CPHT and RPA surgical techniques during LTx, which attempts to secure the portal flow to the liver graft in case of pre‐existent diffuse PVT. We provide a review of all reported clinical experience at international clinical centers using these techniques. According to our meta‐analysis a total of 15 studies were published on this topic between 1996 and 2005. In summary, a total of 56 orthotopic LTx have been performed in 53 patients (28 men, 25 women) combined with either CPHT or RPA, for the purpose of providing the donor graft with adequate inflow. Mean age was 44 yr including two patients who were infants, with the youngest recipient being two yr old. Main indications for LTx were liver cirrhosis caused by viral hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis and cryptogenic cirrhosis. CPHT was performed in 46 cases, and RPA in 10 cases. Thirty‐five of 53 patients (66%) had surgery previous to LTx. Of these, 13 (37%) patients presented with a history of other previous surgical procedures for decompression of portal hypertension or treatment of associated complications (portocaval shunts, splenectomy, etc). Ascites, renal dysfunction, lower extremity and torso edema and variceal bleeding were dominant post‐operative complications after CPHT or RPA noted in 22 cases (41.5%), 18 cases (34%), 17 cases (32%) and 13 cases (24.5%) respectively. Patients’ follow‐up ranged from two to 48 months. Patients survived [39 (74%)] and patients died [14 (26%)] during the course of observation. Based on the literature, we conclude that the ideal technique to overcome PVT during LTx is still controversial. Short‐term follow‐up results of both methods are promising, however, long‐term results are unknown at present. Furthermore, clinical follow‐up and basic experimental work is required to evaluate the influence of systemic venous inflow to the liver graft with respect to long‐term liver function and liver regeneration.