Correction

Boyd, J; Woodruff, W; Iii; Strunsky, V; Brown, N; Ea 3rd, Monaco; Jankowitz, B; Tyler-Kabara, E; Cerase, A; Rubenni, E; Tassi, R; Maybody, M; Uszynski, M; Morton, E; Kunishio, K; Yamamoto, Y; Sunami, N; Chen, L; Liu, J; Zhou, D; Cherici, C; Malacarne, Vincenzo; Malacarne, V; Kosinski, J; Roberts, L; Gerald, B; Rossitti, S; Raininko, R; Andrews, E; Howard, J; Halstuk, K; Littooy, F; Baker, W; Jerius, J; Stevens, S; Freeman, M; Moncada, R; Shannon, M; Miller, R; Pereira, L; Nepomuceno, L; Coimbra, P; Muttikkal, Eluvathingal; Varghese, T; Chavan, S; V; Waaijer, A; Van Leeuwen, M; Van Der Worp, H; Chung, T

doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.307corr2

Public

Correction

Published in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery • Aug 26, 2010

NobleIDark:/48914/w1/20260525/B7B9519ERecord on NobleID

Authors:

J Boyd

,

W Woodruff

,

Iii

Abstract

When performing diagnostic angiography to evaluate the cervical carotid bifurcation, the catheter is placed inside the CCA to image both the ICA and ECA. In the vast majority of cases when only the ICA or ECA is visualized, the catheter has been unintentionally advanced distal to the bifurcation. Th...

Subject

Medicine

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!