AbbVie (Netherlands)

BACKGROUND: Albuminuria, elevated serum creatinine and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are pivotal indicators of kidney decline. Yet, it is uncertain if these and emerging biomarkers such as uric acid represent independent predictors of kidney disease progression or subsequent outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study systematically examined the available literature documenting the role of albuminuria, serum creatinine, eGFR, and uric acid in predicting kidney disease progression and cardio-renal outcomes in persons with T2DM. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Trials Register and Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant studies from January 2000 through May 2016. PubMed was searched from 2013 until May 2016 to retrieve studies not yet indexed in the other databases. Observational cohort or non-randomized longitudinal studies relevant to albuminuria, serum creatinine, eGFR, uric acid and their association with kidney disease progression, non-fatal cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality as outcomes in persons with T2DM, were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers screened citations to ensure studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: From 2249 citations screened, 81 studies were retained, of which 39 were omitted during the extraction phase (cross-sectional [n = 16]; no outcome/measure of interest [n = 13]; not T2DM specific [n = 7]; review article [n = 1]; editorial [n = 1]; not in English language [n = 1]). Of the remaining 42 longitudinal study publications, biomarker measurements were diverse, with seven different measures for eGFR and five different measures for albuminuria documented. Kidney disease progression differed substantially across 31 publications, with GFR loss (n = 9 [29.0%]) and doubling of serum creatinine (n = 5 [16.1%]) the most frequently reported outcome measures. Numerous publications presented risk estimates for albuminuria (n = 18), serum creatinine/eGFR (n = 13), or both combined (n = 6), with only one study reporting for uric acid. Most often, these biomarkers were associated with a greater risk of experiencing clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the utility of albuminuria, serum creatinine, and eGFR as predictors of kidney disease progression, further efforts to harmonize biomarker measurements are needed given the disparate methodologies observed in this review. Such efforts would help better establish the clinical significance of these and other biomarkers of renal function and cardio-renal outcomes in persons with T2DM.

Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of cytosolic tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine signal transduction, including cytokines involved in a range of inflammatory diseases, such as RA, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and IBD. Several small-molecule JAK inhibitors (JAKis) are now approved for the treatment of various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. There are, however, key differences between these agents that could potentially translate into unique clinical profiles. Each JAKi has a unique chemical structure, resulting in a distinctive mode of binding within the catalytic cleft of the target JAK, and giving rise to distinct pharmacological characteristics. In addition, the available agents have differing selectivity for JAK isoforms, as well as off-target effects against non-JAKs. Other differences include effects on haematological parameters, DNA damage repair, reproductive toxicity and metabolism/elimination. Here we review the pharmacological profiles of the JAKis abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if disease duration and number of prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) affect response to therapy in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Associations between disease duration or number of prior DMARDs and response to therapy were assessed using data from two randomised controlled trials in patients with established RA (mean duration, 11 years) receiving adalimumab+methotrexate. Response to therapy was assessed at week 24 using disease activity outcomes, including 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and proportions of patients with 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses. RESULTS: In the larger study (N=207), a greater number of prior DMARDs (>2 vs 0-1) was associated with smaller improvements in DAS28(CRP) (-1.8 vs -2.2), SDAI (-22.1 vs -26.9) and HAQ-DI (-0.43 vs -0.64) from baseline to week 24. RA duration of >10 years versus <1 year was associated with higher HAQ-DI scores (1.1 vs 0.7) at week 24, but results on DAS28(CRP) and SDAI were mixed. A greater number of prior DMARDs and longer RA duration were associated with lower ACR response rates at week 24. Data from the second trial (N=67) generally confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Number of prior DMARDs and disease duration affect responses to therapy in patients with established RA. Furthermore, number of prior DMARDs, regardless of disease duration, has a limiting effect on the potential response to adalimumab therapy.

Genomic studies in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have identified genetic variants that account for the majority of AMD risk. An important next step is to understand the functional consequences and downstream effects of the identified AMD-associated genetic variants. Instrumental for this next step are 'omics' technologies, which enable high-throughput characterization and quantification of biological molecules, and subsequent integration of genomics with these omics datasets, a field referred to as systems genomics. Single cell sequencing studies of the retina and choroid demonstrated that the majority of candidate AMD genes identified through genomic studies are expressed in non-neuronal cells, such as the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), glia, myeloid and choroidal cells, highlighting that many different retinal and choroidal cell types contribute to the pathogenesis of AMD. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) studies in retinal tissue have identified putative causal genes by demonstrating a genetic overlap between gene regulation and AMD risk. Linking genetic data to complement measurements in the systemic circulation has aided in understanding the effect of AMD-associated genetic variants in the complement system, and supports that protein QTL (pQTL) studies in plasma or serum samples may aid in understanding the effect of genetic variants and pinpointing causal genes in AMD. A recent epigenomic study fine-mapped AMD causal variants by determing regulatory regions in RPE cells differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-RPE). Another approach that is being employed to pinpoint causal AMD genes is to produce synthetic DNA assemblons representing risk and protective haplotypes, which are then delivered to cellular or animal model systems. Pinpointing causal genes and understanding disease mechanisms is crucial for the next step towards clinical translation. Clinical trials targeting proteins encoded by the AMD-associated genomic loci C3, CFB, CFI, CFH, and ARMS2/HTRA1 are currently ongoing, and a phase III clinical trial for C3 inhibition recently showed a modest reduction of lesion growth in geographic atrophy. The EYERISK consortium recently developed a genetic test for AMD that allows genotyping of common and rare variants in AMD-associated genes. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were applied to quantify AMD genetic risk, and may aid in predicting AMD progression. In conclusion, genomic studies represent a turning point in our exploration of AMD. The results of those studies now serve as a driving force for several clinical trials. Expanding to omics and systems genomics will further decipher function and causality from the associations that have been reported, and will enable the development of therapies that will lessen the burden of AMD.

Depatux-m is a tumor-specific antibody-drug-conjugate consisting of antibody (ABT-806) bound to the toxin monomethylauristatin-F. We investigated depatux-m in EGFR-amplified recurrent glioblastoma (40–50% of glioblastoma). EORTC-1410-BTG (NCT02343406) is a randomized open label phase II study. Eligible were patients with centrally confirmed EGFR-amplified glioblastoma at first recurrence after temozolomide chemo-irradiation, occurring ≥3 months after radiotherapy. After stratification for WHO status and time of relapse (<16 or ≥16 weeks after the first day of the last temozolomide cycle), patients were randomized to either a) treatment with depatux-m 1.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously, or b) the same treatment combined with temozolomide 150–200 mg/m2 day 1–5 every 4 weeks, or c) either lomustine or temozolomide (TMZ/LOM) depending on the time of relapse. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); 240 patients/170 events were needed to detect a HR reduction of 0.54 in the depatux-m arms. Between March 2015 and July 2016 260 patients were randomized. With 199 events observed, for the primary comparison of depatux-m in combination with TMZ versus TMZ/LOM a HR of 0.71 was observed (95%CI [0.50, 1.02]; p = 0.031 one-sided; median OS 9.6 months versus 8.2 months, 1-year OS rate 39.7% versus 28.2%). No OS difference was observed between depatux-m monotherapy (median OS 7.9 months) and TMZ/LOM (HR 1.04; 95%CI [0.73, 1.48]. In patients with relapse ≥16 weeks after end of 1stline TMZ treatment, combined depatux-m/TMZ was associated with improved OS (HR 0.45, 95%CI [0.23, 0.87]; median OS 14.9 months versus 9.5 months). The main toxicity observed in depatux-m treated patients was ocular (grade 3: 27.9%, grade 4: 1%). Although the primary endpoint was not met, depatux-m in combination with TMZ might improve OS in EGFR amplified recurrent glioblastoma. Outcome for depatux-m monotherapy was similar to LOM/TMZ control. Ocular events observed were consistent with earlier studies.

BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of UPA in adults with moderate-to-severe RA in the UPHOLD observational study. METHODS: Co-primary endpoints were: (i) proportion of patients achieving disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) remission (< 2.6) at 6 months; and (ii) proportion of those patients maintaining remission at 12 months. Additional analyses included proportions of patients achieving and maintaining DAS28(CRP) low disease activity (LDA; ≤ 3.2), other composite measures of disease activity, and subgroup analyses by therapy strategy and prior treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the full analysis set (FAS; patients receiving ≥ 1 UPA dose) were reported through August 10, 2023. Co-primary and selected secondary endpoints were analyzed by modified non-responder imputation (mNRI) in modified (m)FAS1 (FAS patients who completed 6 months of treatment and had DAS28[CRP] data available, and those who discontinued before 6 months) and mFAS2 (mFAS1 patients who achieved remission at 6 months, completed 12 months of treatment, and had DAS28[CRP] data available, and those who discontinued between 6 and 12 months); and as observed (AO) in patients with non-missing data. RESULTS: Of 1719 participants, 1717 were enrolled; 1701 comprised the FAS. Overall, 400/1719 (23.3%) patients discontinued before 12 months. Of mFAS1 patients, 499 (mNRI: 499/1074 [46.5%]; AO: 499/902 [55.3%]) achieved DAS28(CRP) remission at 6 months; of mFAS2 patients, 269 (mNRI: 269/340 [79.1%]; AO: 269/317 [84.9%]) maintained remission at 12 months. DAS28(CRP) remission or LDA rates were consistent regardless of whether UPA was initiated and maintained as monotherapy or combination therapy. Similar responses were observed across prior treatment subgroups. Among selected TEAEs of special interest, herpes zoster and serious infection occurred at 3.12 and 2.62 events/100 patient-years, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: UPA demonstrated real-world effectiveness in moderate-to-severe RA, with approximately half of patients achieving DAS28(CRP) remission at 6 months and most maintaining remission through 12 months. The real-world benefit-risk profile of UPA remains favorable and is consistent with phase 3 clinical trial data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04497597.

Severe infection of infants with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of morbidity in the developed world and mortality in the developing world. Prophylaxis using palivizumab in infants at risk for severe RSV disease reduces the rate of hospitalisation in this population of children. To ensure complete prophylaxis, infants must receive monthly doses over the winter season. To improve parental convenience, the Synacare® programme was implemented in Ireland and the Netherlands. Synacare® is now a longstanding programme in which palivizumab is administered in the home setting by skilled nurses. Protocols and procedures described here illustrate the efficiency and acceptability of the home delivery service of RSV disease prophylaxis. Post-administration surveys have indicated a high level of parental satisfaction with the programme. At-home paediatric programmes like Synacare® may serve as an alternative to burdensome monthly hospital visits and may lead to enhanced clinical outcomes.

Purpose This phase 1 study examined safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor ABT-767 in patients with advanced solid tumors and BRCA1/2 mutations or with high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Methods Patients received ABT-767 monotherapy orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose was escalated from 20 mg once daily to 500 mg twice daily (BID). Dose-limiting toxicities, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), food effect, objective response rate, and biomarkers predicting response were determined. Results Ninety-three patients were treated with ABT-767; 80 had a primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer. ABT-767 demonstrated dose-proportional PK up to 500 mg BID and half-life of ~2 h. Food had no effect on ABT-767 bioavailability. Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were nausea, fatigue, decreased appetite, and anemia. Anemia showed dose-dependent increase. RP2D was 400 mg BID. Objective response rate by RECIST 1.1 was 21% (17/80) in all evaluable patients and 20% (14/71) in evaluable patients with ovarian cancer. Response rate by RECIST 1.1 and/or CA-125 was 30% (24/80) in patients with ovarian cancer. Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and platinum sensitivity were associated with tumor response. Median progression-free survival was longer for HRD positive (6.7 months) versus HRD negative patients (1.8 months) with ovarian cancer. Conclusions ABT-767 had an acceptable safety profile up to the established RP2D of 400 mg BID and dose-proportional PK. Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, HRD positivity, and platinum sensitivity were more sensitive to ABT-767.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the achievement of comprehensive disease control (CDC) following 1 year of treatment with adalimumab+methotrexate versus methotrexate alone and whether early achievement of remission (at week 24 or 26) is associated with CDC at week 52 in patients with either early or established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Post hoc analyses were conducted in three clinical studies assessing treatment with adalimumab+methotrexate: DE019 (NCT00195702) enrolled patients with established RA who were methotrexate inadequate responders; OPTIMA (NCT00420927) and PREMIER (NCT00195663) enrolled methotrexate-naive patients with early RA. In OPTIMA, patients not achieving stable low disease activity at weeks 22 and 26 in the placebo+methotrexate group could receive open-label adalimumab+methotrexate for 52 weeks (Rescue ADA arm). CDC was defined as the simultaneous achievement of clinical remission (DAS28(CRP)<2.6), normal function (HAQ-DI<0.5) and absence of radiographic progression (ΔmTSS≤0.5). RESULTS: Regardless of disease duration, significantly more patients receiving adalimumab+methotrexate achieved CDC compared with methotrexate alone. In the adalimumab+methotrexate group, a numerically greater proportion of patients with early RA (~25%) versus established RA (14%) achieved CDC at 1 year; achievement of CDC was notably greater among patients who met criteria for remission at week 24 or 26 (~50% of patients with early RA and 39% with established RA). CONCLUSION: Treatment with adalimumab+methotrexate increases the likelihood of achieving CDC in patients with either early or established RA. Clinical remission at week 24 or 26 is associated with achievement of CDC at week 52. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DE019 (NCT00195702), OPTIMA (NCT00420927), PREMIER (NCT00195663); Post-results.

TPS9149 Background: Teliso-V is a first-in-class anti–c-Met antibody-drug conjugate composed of the monoclonal antibody telisotuzumab (ABT-700), a cleavable valine-citrulline (dipeptide) linker, and cytotoxic monomethylauristatin E (MMAE; potent microtubule polymerization inhibitor). Direct MMAE payload delivery to c-Met protein overexpressing (OE) cells enables Teliso-V to work independently of c-Met signaling. In NSCLC, while c-Met OE is more common than MET gene amplification (Amp), about 90% of MET Amp tumors will also be c-Met OE. In an ongoing phase 2 trial, Teliso-V showed encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety in previously treated c-Met OE NSQ NSCLC population (Camidge et al. JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.9016). From this study, a retrospective analysis of 10 patients with MET Amp (≥1.8 MET gene to chromosome 7 copy number ratio by fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]) demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 80%. Described here is an ongoing phase 2 study evaluating efficacy and safety of Teliso-V monotherapy in patients with previously untreated MET Amp locally advanced/metastatic NSQ NSCLC. Methods: This is a phase 2, single-arm, open-label, global study (NCT05513703). Eligible patients (≥18 years) have histologically documented advanced/metastatic NSQ NSCLC, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, confirmed MET Amp determined centrally by FISH or locally by FISH, tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS), or plasma NGS using sponsor-approved assays. Additional eligibility criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, no alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, or BRAF that predict sensitivity to targeted therapy, no prior systemic therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, no prior c-Met–targeted antibody therapy. Teliso-V is administered intravenously at 1.9 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or other study drug discontinuation criteria are met. Primary endpoint is ORR assessed by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints include duration of response and disease control rate, progression-free survival per ICR, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Tumor assessments (per RECIST v1.1) are performed at baseline and approx. every 6 (year 1), 8 (year 2), and 12 weeks (year 3 and beyond). PROs are assessed through validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-LC13, EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L). Safety and tolerability are evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, laboratory data, and vital signs. Pharmacokinetic and biomarker evaluations may be used for exploratory analyses. The trial intends to enroll approx. 70 efficacy-evaluable patients, with interim analyses planned after 20 and 50 patients are able to be followed for ≥6 months. The study was open to enrollment as of Nov 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05513703 .

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes in an open-label extension (OLE) study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving adalimumab monotherapy or adalimumab+methotrexate following attainment of low disease activity (LDA) with adalimumab+methotrexate. METHODS: Methotrexate-naive patients with early RA were randomised to adalimumab, methotrexate or adalimumab +methotrexate in a double-blind, 2-year study. Patients who completed the study and achieved LDA (28-joint Disease Activity Score using C reactive protein (DAS28(CRP)<3.2) could receive adalimumab monotherapy for up to 8 additional years in the OLE; open-label methotrexate could be added per investigator's discretion. This post hoc analysis included data up to OLE year 3 (study year 5) from patients receiving adalimumab+methotrexate who achieved LDA at year 2 followed by adalimumab monotherapy or methotrexate reinitiation. Normal physical function was defined as Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire <0.5 and radiographic non-progression as change in modified total Sharp score ≤0.5. RESULTS: Of 140 patients initiating adalimumab monotherapy, 84 (60%) received adalimumab only (methotrexate non-use) and 56 (40%) reinitiated methotrexate (methotrexate use) during OLE treatment. Median (IQR) time to first methotrexate use was 5.1 (0.1-31.4) weeks. Among methotrexate users, 61% retained LDA, 48% achieved DAS28(CRP) <2.6, 45% had normal physical function and 46% had no radiographic progression at year 5; for non-users, 63%, 50%, 58% and 50%, respectively, achieved these milestones. Adverse event rates were similar between methotrexate non-use and use patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab monotherapy effectively maintained good clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes for up to 3 additional years in ≥50% of patients who attained LDA after 2 years of adalimumab+methotrexate therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00195663; Post-results.

Various plasma biomarkers for amyloid-β (Aβ) have shown high predictability of amyloid PET positivity. However, the characteristics of discordance between amyloid PET and plasma Aβ42/40 positivity are poorly understood. Thorough interpretation of discordant cases is vital as Aβ plasma biomarker is imminent to integrate into clinical guidelines. We aimed to determine the characteristics of discordant groups between amyloid PET and plasma Aβ42/40 positivity, and inter-assays variability depending on plasma assays. We compared tau burden measured by PET, brain volume assessed by MRI, cross-sectional cognitive function, longitudinal cognitive decline and polygenic risk score (PRS) between PET/plasma groups (PET-/plasma-, PET-/plasma+, PET+/plasma-, PET+/plasma+) using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Additionally, we investigated inter-assays variability between immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry method developed at Washington University (IP-MS-WashU) and Elecsys immunoassay from Roche (IA-Elc). PET+/plasma+ was significantly associated with higher tau burden assessed by PET in entorhinal, Braak III/IV, and Braak V/VI regions, and with decreased volume of hippocampal and precuneus regions compared to PET-/plasma-. PET+/plasma+ showed poor performances in global cognition, memory, executive and daily-life function, and rapid cognitive decline. PET+/plasma+ was related to high PRS. The PET-/plasma+ showed intermediate changes between PET-/plasma- and PET+/plasma+ in terms of tau burden, hippocampal and precuneus volume, cross-sectional and longitudinal cognition, and PRS. PET+/plasma- represented heterogeneous characteristics with most prominent variability depending on plasma assays. Moreover, IP-MS-WashU showed more linear association between amyloid PET standardized uptake value ratio and plasma Aβ42/40 than IA-Elc. IA-Elc showed more plasma Aβ42/40 positivity in the amyloid PET-negative stage than IP-MS-WashU. Characteristics of PET-/plasma+ support plasma biomarkers as early biomarker of amyloidopathy prior to amyloid PET. Various plasma biomarker assays might be applied distinctively to detect different target subjects or disease stages.