Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.

JL, Brożek; EA, Akl; E, Compalati; J, Kreis; L, Terracciano; A, Fiocchi; E, Ueffing; J, Andrews; P, Alonso-Coello; JJ, Meerpohl; DM, Lang; R, Jaeschke; JW Jr, Williams; B, Phillips; A, Lethaby; P, Bossuyt; P, Glasziou; M, Helfand; J, Watine; M, Afilalo; V, Welch; A, Montedori; I, Abraha; AR, Horvath; AR, Horvath; J, Bousquet; GH, Guyatt; HJ, Schünemann

doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02530.x

Public

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.

Shared by NobleBlocks on Jan 17, 2011 • 12:00 AM UTC

Authors:

Brożek JL

Akl EA

Compalati E

Abstract

This is the third and last article in the series about the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines and its application in the field of allergy. We describ...

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!