Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

GA, Ospina-Tascón; LE, Calderón-Tapia; AF, García; V, Zarama; F, Gómez-Álvarez; T, Álvarez-Saa; S, Pardo-Otálvaro; DF, Bautista-Rincón; MP, Vargas; JL, Aldana-Díaz; Á, Marulanda; A, Gutiérrez; J, Varón; M, Gómez; ME, Ochoa; E, Escobar; M, Umaña; J, Díez; GJ, Tobón; LL, Albornoz; Flórez CA, Celemín; GO, Ruiz; EL, Cáceres; LF, Reyes; LP, Damiani; AB, Cavalcanti

doi:10.1001/jama.2021.20714

Public

Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shared by NobleBlocks on Dec 1, 2021 • 12:00 AM UTC

Authors:

Ospina-Tascón GA

Calderón-Tapia LE

García AF

Abstract

<h4>Importance</h4>The effect of high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy has not been established in the setting of severe COVID-19.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the effect of high-flow oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy on need for endo...

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!