Novo Nordisk (India)

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic disease with limited treatment options in pediatric patients. Liraglutide may be useful for weight management in adolescents with obesity. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, which consisted of a 56-week treatment period and a 26-week follow-up period, we enrolled adolescents (12 to <18 years of age) with obesity and a poor response to lifestyle therapy alone. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either liraglutide (3.0 mg) or placebo subcutaneously once daily, in addition to lifestyle therapy. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) standard-deviation score at week 56. RESULTS: A total of 125 participants were assigned to the liraglutide group and 126 to the placebo group. Liraglutide was superior to placebo with regard to the change from baseline in the BMI standard-deviation score at week 56 (estimated difference, -0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.37 to -0.08; P = 0.002). A reduction in BMI of at least 5% was observed in 51 of 113 participants in the liraglutide group and in 20 of 105 participants in the placebo group (estimated percentage, 43.3% vs. 18.7%), and a reduction in BMI of at least 10% was observed in 33 and 9, respectively (estimated percentage, 26.1% vs. 8.1%). A greater reduction was observed with liraglutide than with placebo for BMI (estimated difference, -4.64 percentage points) and for body weight (estimated difference, -4.50 kg [for absolute change] and -5.01 percentage points [for relative change]). After discontinuation, a greater increase in the BMI standard-deviation score was observed with liraglutide than with placebo (estimated difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.23). More participants in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group had gastrointestinal adverse events (81 of 125 [64.8%] vs. 46 of 126 [36.5%]) and adverse events that led to discontinuation of the trial treatment (13 [10.4%] vs. 0). Few participants in either group had serious adverse events (3 [2.4%] vs. 5 [4.0%]). One suicide, which occurred in the liraglutide group, was assessed by the investigator as unlikely to be related to the trial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents with obesity, the use of liraglutide (3.0 mg) plus lifestyle therapy led to a significantly greater reduction in the BMI standard-deviation score than placebo plus lifestyle therapy. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; NN8022-4180 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02918279.).

NN2211 is a long-acting, metabolically stable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) derivative designed for once daily administration in humans. NN2211 dose dependently reduced the glycemic levels in ob/ob mice, with antihyperglycemic activity still evident 24 h postdose. Apart from an initial reduction in food intake, there were no significant differences between NN2211 and vehicle treatment, and body weight was not affected. Histological examination revealed that beta-cell proliferation and mass were not increased significantly in ob/ob mice with NN2211, although there was a strong tendency for increased proliferation. In db/db mice, exendin-4 and NN2211 decreased blood glucose compared with vehicle, but NN2211 had a longer duration of action. Food intake was lowered only on day 1 with both compounds, and body weight was unaffected. beta-Cell proliferation rate and mass were significantly increased with NN2211, but with exendin-4, only the beta-cell proliferation rate was significantly increased. In conclusion, NN2211 reduced blood glucose after acute and chronic treatment in ob/ob and db/db mice and was associated with increased beta-cell mass and proliferation in db/db mice. NN2211 is currently in phase 2 clinical development.

Development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) in haemophilia patients is one of the most serious complications of repeated exposure to replacement therapy and has major clinical and economic consequences. To evaluate the relationship between inhibitor status of haemophilia patients and their quality of life (QoL) and degree of arthropathy and to compare the orthopaedic status of patients with/without inhibitors. An observational, cross-sectional, case control study enrolling: group A (n = 38), males aged 14-35 years, with severe congenital haemophilia A or B who had inhibitors against FVIII/FIX >5 years; group B (n = 41), as group A, but aged 36-65 years and group C (n = 49), as group A, but without inhibitors. Socio-demographics: medical history, clinical characteristics and QoL were assessed. In groups A and B, 16% and 27% were hospitalized for orthopaedic procedures vs. 4% in group C. Patient mobility was also severely reduced in groups A and B, with 24% and 22% using wheelchairs vs. 4% in group C, and 50% and 51% needing a walking aid vs. 29% in group C. Significantly more joint pain was reported by patients in group A vs. those in group C; clinical/radiological orthopaedic scores were also worse in group A vs. group C. Significantly more joint abnormality was reported by patients in group A vs. group C. The burden of orthopaedic complications and the impact on QoL are more severe in haemophilia patients who have developed inhibitors than in those without inhibitors.

AIMS: To assess the effect of liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue on pancreatic B-cell function. methods: Patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 39) were randomized to treatment with 0.65, 1.25 or 1.9 mg/day liraglutide or placebo for 14 weeks. First- and second-phase insulin release were measured by means of the insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Arginine-stimulated insulin secretion was measured during a hyperglycaemic clamp (20 mmol/l). Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity were estimated by means of the insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: The two highest doses of liraglutide (1.25 and 1.9 mg/day) significantly increased first-phase insulin secretion by 118 and 103%, respectively (P < 0.05). Second-phase insulin secretion was significantly increased only in the 1.25 mg/day group vs. placebo. Arginine-stimulated insulin secretion increased significantly at the two highest dose levels vs. placebo by 114 and 94%, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant treatment effect on glucose effectiveness or insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen weeks of treatment with liraglutide showed improvements in first- and second-phase insulin secretion, together with improvements in arginine-stimulated insulin secretion during hyperglycaemia.

INTRODUCTION: The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes necessitates treatment intensification. This often involves intensification with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) initially, followed by other agents, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), with the majority of patients eventually requiring insulin therapy. Therefore, this trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of IDegLira (combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide) in controlling glycemia in adults with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled on a GLP-1RA and OADs. METHODS: In this 26-week open-label phase 3b trial, patients on maximum-dose GLP-1RA therapy (liraglutide once daily or exenatide twice daily) with metformin alone or with pioglitazone and/or sulfonylurea were randomized 2:1 to IDegLira once daily (n = 292) or to unchanged GLP-1RA therapy (n = 146), continuing OADs at the pre-trial dose. RESULTS: <7% and ≤6.5%, compared with 36% and 23% on unchanged GLP-1RA, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose and 9-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles improved significantly more with IDegLira versus unchanged GLP-1RA. The mean change in weight was +2.0 kg with IDegLira, versus -0.8 kg with unchanged GLP-1RA. Rates of confirmed hypoglycemia were low, but higher with IDegLira versus unchanged GLP-1RA. The safety profile of IDegLira was consistent with previous findings; both treatments were well tolerated and the rate of nausea was low in both groups. IDegLira improved patient-reported outcomes versus unchanged GLP-1RA. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira provided superior glycemic control versus unchanged GLP-1RA and represents an efficacious intensification approach in patients inadequately controlled on GLP-1RAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01676116. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Importance: Once-weekly insulin icodec could provide a simpler dosing alternative to daily basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec vs once-daily insulin degludec in people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 at 92 sites in 11 countries in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with any noninsulin glucose-lowering agents with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7%-11% (53-97 mmol/mol). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either once-weekly icodec and once-daily placebo (icodec group; n = 294) or once-daily degludec and once-weekly placebo (degludec group; n = 294). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.3% percentage points). Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 26, mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, body weight change from baseline to week 26, and number of level 2 (clinically significant; glucose level <54 mg/dL) and level 3 (severe; requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycemic episodes. Results: Among 588 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 58 [10] years; 219 [37%] women), 564 (96%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.6% (observed) to 7.0% (estimated) at 26 weeks in the icodec group and from 8.5% (observed) to 7.2% (estimated) in the degludec group (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.2 [95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1] percentage points), confirming noninferiority (P < .001) and superiority (P = .002). There were no significant differences between the icodec and degludec groups for fasting plasma glucose change from baseline to week 26 (ETD, 0 [95% CI, -6 to 5] mg/dL; P = .90), mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, or body weight change from baseline to week 26 (2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg; ETD, 0.46 [95% CI, -0.19 to 1.10] kg; P = .17). Combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia rates were numerically higher in the icodec group than the degludec group from week 0 to 31 (0.31 vs 0.15 events per patient-year exposure; P = .11) and statistically higher in the icodec group from week 0 to 26 (0.35 vs 0.12 events per patient-year exposure; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes, once-weekly icodec demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction to once-daily degludec after 26 weeks of treatment, with no difference in weight change and a higher rate of combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events in the context of less than 1 event per patient-year exposure in both groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04795531.

Nanotechnology can improve the mechanical barrier and the antimicrobial (which will not allow the invasion of microorganisms in the food, increasing the food barrier properties, hence can be a very promising material for food packaging. Nanomaterials will keep the food fresh in the food packaging design. Silver nanoparticles and nanoclay represent most of the nanoempowered food packaging available on the market others like zinc oxide and titanium share little of the current market. Zinc oxide enhances nutritional values in food products by adding nutrients. It helps improve the flavour, storage properties, appearance, and texture of the food. Titanium dioxide is used for food safety purposes since it prevents food from spoiling and increases the food’s shelf life. In current food packaging, these nanomaterials are used to grant antimicrobial capacity and further develop hindrance properties, broadening packaged food’s shelf life and newness. Nanofood packaging has many benefits for general wellbeing. The related harmfulness of migration, particularly in acidic conditions, is extensive. The use of nanomaterials because of their physical and chemical properties makes them broadly accessible in numerous areas. This review summarizes the antimicrobial packaging application, nanomaterials synthesis, and nanomaterial properties in food packaging.

BACKGROUND: No medications are currently approved for the treatment of nonmonogenic, nonsyndromic obesity in children younger than 12 years of age. Although the use of liraglutide has been shown to induce weight loss in adults and adolescents with obesity, its safety and efficacy have not been established in children. METHODS: In this phase 3a trial, which consisted of a 56-week treatment period and a 26-week follow-up period, we randomly assigned children (6 to <12 years of age) with obesity, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive either once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide at a dose of 3.0 mg (or the maximum tolerated dose) or placebo, plus lifestyle interventions. The primary end point was the percentage change in the body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters). The confirmatory secondary end points were the percentage change in body weight and a reduction in BMI of at least 5%. RESULTS: A total of 82 participants underwent randomization; 56 were assigned to the liraglutide group and 26 to the placebo group. At week 56, the mean percentage change from baseline in BMI was -5.8% with liraglutide and 1.6% with placebo, representing an estimated difference of -7.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -11.6 to -3.2; P<0.001). The mean percentage change in body weight was 1.6% with liraglutide and 10.0% with placebo, representing an estimated difference of -8.4 percentage points (95% CI, -13.4 to -3.3; P = 0.001), and a reduction in BMI of at least 5% occurred in 46% of participants in the liraglutide group and in 9% of participants in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.3 [95% CI, 1.4 to 28.8]; P = 0.02). Adverse events occurred in 89% and 88% of participants in the liraglutide and placebo groups, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the liraglutide group (80% vs. 54%); serious adverse events were reported in 12% and 8% of participants in the liraglutide and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among children (6 to <12 years of age) with obesity, treatment with liraglutide for 56 weeks plus lifestyle interventions resulted in a greater reduction in BMI than placebo plus lifestyle interventions. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; SCALE Kids ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04775082.).

AIM: To confirm the superiority, compared with placebo, of adding liraglutide to pre-existing basal insulin analogue ± metformin in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol)]. METHODS: In this 26-week, double-blind, parallel-group study, conducted in clinics or hospitals, 451 subjects were randomized 1 : 1 to once-daily liraglutide 1.8 mg (dose escalated from 0.6 and 1.2 mg/day, respectively, for 1 week each; n = 226) or placebo (n = 225) added to their pre-existing basal insulin analogue (≥20 U/day) ± metformin (≥1500 mg/day). After randomization, insulin adjustments above the pre-study dose were not allowed. The primary endpoint was HbA1c change. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, HbA1c decreased more with liraglutide [-1.3% (-14.2 mmol/mol)] than with placebo [-0.1% (-1.2 mmol/mol); p < 0.0001]. More subjects on liraglutide reached HbA1c targets: <7.0% (59% vs 14%; p < 0.0001) and ≤6.5% (43% vs 4%; p < 0.0001) using slightly less insulin (35.8 IU vs 40.1 IU). Greater decreases from baseline (estimated treatment differences vs placebo; p < 0.0001) occurred in fasting plasma glucose (-1.3 mmol/l), seven-point glucose profiles (-1.6 mmol/l), body weight (-3.1 kg) and systolic blood pressure (-5.0 mmHg). Transient gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea: 22.2% vs 3.1%) and minor hypoglycaemia (18.2% vs 12.4%) were more frequent with liraglutide than placebo, and pulse increased (4.5 beats/min) compared with placebo. No severe hypoglycaemia or pancreatitis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Adding liraglutide to a basal insulin analogue ± metformin significantly improved glycaemic control, body weight and systolic blood pressure compared with placebo. Typical gastrointestinal symptoms and minor hypoglycaemia were more frequent with liraglutide.

Reducing dosing frequency may lower treatment burden and improve persistence and adherence. This retrospective, observational study assessed persistence and adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating once-weekly or daily injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in US clinical practice. The study used data from adults (≥ 18 years) with T2D who were included in the IBM MarketScan Explorys Claims-EMR Data Set for ≥ 180 days pre-index and ≥ 365 days post-index, were GLP-1 RA and insulin naïve at first claim (index date) for once-weekly or daily injectable GLP-1 RAs (follow-up: index date + 365 days), and were propensity score (PS) matched 1:1 by baseline characteristics. Persistence, defined as the stay time, was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered of 0.8 or greater. To assess whether patients with more advanced disease would benefit from long-acting treatments, patients were matched to the baseline characteristics of basal insulin initiators using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The PS-matched cohorts (n = 784 each) had similar baseline characteristics. Once-weekly regimens were associated with significantly higher persistence than daily treatments (median stay time: 333 vs 269 days; hazard ratio 0.80 [95% confidence interval 0.71, 0.90]; p < 0.01) and with significantly higher adherence than daily regimens at 6 months and 12 months (p < 0.01 for both). Mean glycated haemoglobin reductions were greater with once-weekly than with daily treatment at 6 months (– 1.1% vs – 0.9%; p < 0.01) and 12 months (– 0.9% vs – 0.7%; p = not significant); adherent patients experienced greater reductions than those with poor adherence. Results were similar in the IPTW-matched analysis. In US clinical practice, once-weekly injectable treatments are associated with better persistence and adherence than daily regimens over 1 year. Once-weekly regimens may also benefit patients with more advanced T2D. For people who take medication over a prolonged time, less frequent doses are often more convenient. This can help people to continue with treatment for as long as prescribed (persistence) and to take their medication as prescribed (adherence). This study examined persistence and adherence in people with type 2 diabetes who started treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). The GLP-1 RAs in this study are injected under the skin using a small needle. Some types are given daily and others are given once weekly. We used a US database of medical records to identify people with type 2 diabetes who had been prescribed these medications and split them into two groups (784 people each) with similar characteristics. One group had received once-weekly GLP-1 RAs and the other group had received daily GLP-1 RAs. We found that the once-weekly group continued taking their medication for longer (333 days) than the daily group (269 days). People in the once-weekly group were also 20% less likely to stop the treatment too early than those in the daily group. More people in the once-weekly group took their medication as prescribed over 1 year compared with the daily group. The once-weekly group also had larger reductions in blood sugar levels after 1 year than the daily group. People who took their medication as prescribed had the greatest improvements in blood sugar levels. Our results suggest that GLP-1 RAs that are injected less frequently can help people to take their medication as prescribed.

To test the role of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) or bovine serum albumin (BSA) autoimmunity in the pathogenesis of diabetes, GAD65 or BSA was injected intraperitoneally into neonatal female NOD mice (100 micrograms/mouse of each protein). Treatment with GAD65, but not with BSA, significantly delayed the onset of diabetes compared with control mice (P < 0.05). At 18 weeks, 6 of 10 control mice compared with 0 of 10 GAD65-treated mice (P = 0.005) and 7 of 14 BSA-treated mice had developed diabetes. However, after 79 weeks, 6 of 10 of the GAD65-treated mice were diabetic compared with 9 of 10 of the control mice and 12 of 14 of the BSA-treated mice. In GAD65-treated mice without diabetes, insulitis was markedly reduced compared with control or BSA-treated mice (P < 10(-4)). To further elucidate why GAD becomes an autoantigen, the expression in NOD mice islets was studied. Quantitative immunohistochemistry revealed that islet cell expression of GAD was increased in 5-week-old NOD mice compared with BALB/c mice (P = 0.02). With the occurrence of insulitis (9-15 weeks), the GAD expression was further increased relative to 5-week-old NOD mice (P < 0.02). In conclusion, GAD, but not BSA, autoimmunity is important for the development of diabetes in NOD mice. Furthermore, concordant with the appearance of insulitis, the GAD expression increased in NOD mouse islets, which could possibly potentiate the beta-cell-directed autoimmunity.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble co-formulation of long-acting and short-acting insulin analogs. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacodynamic response of once-daily IDegAsp dosing in patients with type 1 diabetes. Pharmacokinetic response, as well as safety and tolerability, were assessed as secondary objectives. METHODOLOGY: This was a single-center, open-label, single-arm study. Twenty-two subjects received once-daily insulin degludec (IDeg) (0.42 U/kg) for five consecutive days [with separate bolus insulin aspart (IAsp) as needed for safety and glycemic control], to achieve clinical steady state of the basal component. On Day 6, they received a single injection of IDegAsp (0.6 U/kg, comprising 0.42 U/kg IDeg and 0.18 U/kg IAsp). Pharmacodynamic response was assessed using a 30-h euglycemic glucose clamp, with blood glucose stabilized at a target of 5.5 mmol/L. RESULTS: The glucose infusion rate profile showed a rapid onset of action and a distinct peak due to IAsp, followed by a separate, flat and stable basal glucose-lowering effect due to the IDeg component. Modeling data suggested that the pharmacodynamic profile of IDegAsp was retained with twice-daily dosing (allowing for coverage of two main meals daily). IDegAsp was well tolerated and no safety issues were identified in this trial. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the IAsp component of IDegAsp has a fast onset of appearance and a peak covering the prandial phase, while the IDeg component has a flat and an evenly distributed pharmacokinetic profile over 24 h. IDegAsp is the first co-formulation of a basal insulin analog with an ultra-long duration of action and a mealtime insulin analog in a single soluble injection. These properties translate into clinically relevant benefits, including improved glycemic control and reduction in hypoglycemia.

CONTEXT: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is characterized by lack of appetite control and hyperphagia, leading to obesity. Pharmacological options for weight management are needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether liraglutide treatment for weight management is superior to placebo/no treatment in pediatric individuals with PWS. METHODS: This was a multicenter, 52-week, placebo-controlled trial with a 16-week double-blinded period. Adolescents (n = 31, aged 12-17 years; Tanner stage 2-5) and children (n = 24, aged 6-11 years; Tanner stage <2) with PWS and obesity were included. Patients were randomized 2:1 to liraglutide 3.0 mg (or maximum-tolerated dose) or placebo for 16 weeks, after which placebo was stopped. Liraglutide was continued for 52 weeks. All patients followed a structured diet and exercise program throughout the trial. The coprimary endpoints were change in body mass index (BMI) standard deviation score (SDS) from baseline to 16 and 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints included other weight-related parameters, hyperphagia, and safety. RESULTS: Change in BMI SDS from baseline to weeks 16 and 52 was not significantly different between treatments in adolescents (estimated treatment difference: -0.07 at week 16 and -0.14 at week 52) and children (-0.06 and -0.07, respectively). Changes in other weight-related parameters between treatments were not significant. At week 52, hyperphagia total and drive scores were lower in adolescents treated with liraglutide vs no treatment. The most common adverse events with liraglutide were gastrointestinal disorders. CONCLUSION: Although the coprimary endpoints were not met, changes in hyperphagia total and drive scores in adolescents warrant further studies on liraglutide in this population.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the tissue factor-factor VIIa pathway attenuated the activation of coagulation and prevented death in a gram-negative bacteremia primate model of sepsis. This lethal animal model suggested that tissue factor also influences inflammatory cascades. METHODS: This trial examined the pharmacodynamic effects of active site-inhibited factor VIIa (FFR-recombinant factor VIIa [rFVIIa]; ASIS) on endotoxin-induced procoagulant, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory responses in healthy humans. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received a bolus infusion of 2-ng/kg endotoxin, followed by a bolus infusion of ASIS (400 microg/kg) or placebo 10 minutes later. RESULTS: Endotoxin injection induced inflammation, activation of coagulation, and activation and subsequent inhibition of fibrinolysis. ASIS infusion completely blocked thrombin and fibrin generation, as measured by plasma levels of prothrombin fragment (no increase in the ASIS group, as compared with a 13-fold increase in the placebo group at 4 hours; P <.01), soluble fibrin, and fibrin split product D-dimer. ASIS did not alter endotoxin-induced changes in the fibrinolytic system, cytokine levels, or markers of endothelial (E-selectin, thrombomodulin) or platelet (P-selectin) activation. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, ASIS effectively and selectively attenuates tissue factor-induced thrombin generation. Because ASIS was well tolerated, this study provides seminal data to further characterize its anticoagulant and putative anti-inflammatory effects in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Oral semaglutide at a dose of 25 mg may provide an alternative treatment option to injectable semaglutide (2.4 mg) and higher-dose oral semaglutide (50 mg) for persons with overweight or obesity. METHODS: In a 71-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 22 sites in four countries, we enrolled persons without diabetes who had a body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 30 or higher or a BMI of 27 or higher with at least one obesity-related complication. The participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral semaglutide (25 mg) or placebo once daily, plus lifestyle interventions. The coprimary end points at week 64 were the percent change in body weight and a reduction of 5% or more in body weight; confirmatory secondary end points included reductions in body weight of 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more and the change in the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) Physical Function score. RESULTS: A total of 205 participants were randomly assigned to receive oral semaglutide, and 102 to receive placebo. The estimated mean change in body weight from baseline to week 64 was -13.6% in the oral semaglutide group and -2.2% in the placebo group (estimated difference, -11.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -13.9 to -9.0; P<0.001). Participants in the oral semaglutide group were significantly more likely than those in the placebo group to have body-weight reductions of 5% or more, 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more (P<0.001 for all comparisons) and to have an improved IWQOL-Lite-CT Physical Function score (P<0.001). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with oral semaglutide than with placebo (74.0% vs. 42.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral semaglutide at a dose of 25 mg once daily resulted in a greater mean reduction in body weight than placebo in participants with overweight or obesity. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; OASIS 4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05564117.).

OBJECTIVE: PREDICTIVE 303 was a 26-week, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study in patients with type 2 diabetes that investigated whether patient-driven adjustments of insulin detemir doses using the 303 Algorithm achieved similar glycemic control compared to standard-of-care, physician-driven adjustments in doses. This post hoc sub-analysis evaluates insulin naïve patients on oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) who were directed to start on once-daily insulin detemir as add-on therapy to any other glucose-lowering regimens. METHODS: Patients in the 303 Algorithm group were instructed to adjust their detemir dose every 3 days based on mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values using a simple algorithm: mean FPG < 80 mg/dL, reduce dose by 3 units; between 80-110mg/dL, no change; > 110mg/dL, increase by 3 units. Physicians adjusted the detemir dose for patients in the Standard-of-care group according to their usual practice. No control insulin was used for comparison to insulin detemir. RESULTS: Reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline were similar between those patients in the 303 Algorithm and Standard-of-care groups (-1.1 and -1.0%, respectively; between group p = 0.0933); patients in the 303 Algorithm group achieved a greater reduction in FPG. Patients in both groups experienced a similar, low rate of hypoglycemia. Over 95% and 92% of patients, respectively, used detemir once daily. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that patients with type 2 diabetes naïve to insulin can effectively implement the 303 Algorithm to initiate and adjust a once-daily dose of insulin detemir to achieve improvements in glycemic control.

An inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase isoform (iNOS) is specifically induced in the beta-cells of interleukin (IL)-1 beta-exposed rat islets, suggesting a role for NO in the pathogenesis of type I diabetes. The aim of this study was to clone and characterize iNOS cDNA from cytokine-exposed islets. Neither NO production nor iNOS transcription could be detected in rat islets or in rat insulinoma RIN-5AH beta-cells cultured in the absence of cytokines. Addition of IL-1 beta alone or in combination with tumor necrosis factor-alpha induced a concentration- and time-dependent expression of the iNOS gene and associated NO production (measured as nitrite) from both islets and RIN cells. iNOS transcripts were cloned by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction from the cytokine-exposed rat islets and RIN cells, and DNA sequence analysis revealed a near 100% identity to the recently published iNOS cDNA cloned from cytokine-exposed rat hepatocytes and smooth muscle cells. Recombinant rat islet iNOS was transiently and stably expressed in human kidney 293 fibroblasts, and the high enzymatic activity was inhibited by addition of the L-arginine analogs, N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and aminoguanidine. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealed the recombinant iNOS as a series of spots with the expected molecular mass of 131 kDa and pI values in the range of 6.8 to 7.0. In conclusion, the IL-1 beta-induced iNOS cloned and expressed from rat islets and RIN cells is encoded by the same transcript as the iNOS induced in other cell types.

Amylin is stored in the pancreatic beta-cell granules and cosecreted with insulin in response to nutrient stimuli. To gain further insight into control of hormonal release in beta-cell physiology, we examined whether amylin, like insulin, circulates in a high-frequency oscillatory pattern, and if it does, to compare the secretory patterns of the two hormones. Eight overnight-fasted healthy individuals were studied during intravenous glucose infusion (2.0 mg. kg(-1). min(-1)). Blood was collected every minute for 90 min and analyzed in triplicate for amylin, total amylin immunoreactivity (TAI), and insulin. Mean plasma concentrations of amylin (nonglycosylated), TAI (nonglycosylated plus glycosylated), insulin, and glucose were 2.77 +/- 1.21 pmol/l, 7.60 +/- 1.73 pmol/l, 50.4 +/- 17.5 pmol/l, and 5.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, respectively. The 90-min time series of amylin, TAI, and insulin were analyzed for periodicity (by spectral analysis, autocorrelation analysis, and deconvolution analysis) and regularity [by approximate entropy (ApEn)]. Significant spectral density peaks were demonstrated by a random shuffling technique in 7 (out of 7), 8 (out of 8), and 8 (out of 8) time series, respectively, whereas autocorrelation analysis revealed significant pulsatility in 5 (out of 7), 7 (out of 8), and 5 (out of 8), respectively. The dominant periodicity of oscillations determined by spectral analysis was 4.6 +/- 0.3, 4.6 +/- 0.4, and 6. 5 +/- 1.1 min/pulse, respectively (amylin vs. insulin, P = 0.017, TAI vs. insulin, P = 0.018). By deconvolution analysis, amylin and insulin periodicities were, respectively, 6.3 +/- 1.0 and 5.5 +/- 0. 6 min. By application of the regularity statistic, ApEn, 6 (out of 7), 7 (out of 8), and 6 (out of 8), respectively, were found to be significantly different from random. In conclusion, like several other hormones, circulating amylin concentrations exhibit oscillations in the secretory patterns for nonglycosylated as well as glycosylated forms. Whether the high-frequency pulsatile release of amylin is disturbed in diabetes is not known.

We evaluated antibody persistence up to 68 months (M) post-vaccination with a quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W and Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT) or a licensed monovalent MenC conjugate vaccine (MenC-CRM197) and subsequent booster responses to MenACWY-TT in healthy European children. In the initial study (NCT00674583), healthy children, 2–10 years of age, were randomized to receive a single dose of either MenACWY-TT or MenC-CRM197. In the follow-up study, we present the persistence at 32, 44, 56, and 68 M post-vaccination, overall and stratified by age (2–5 and 6–10 years), and the immunogenicity and safety of MenACWY-TT administered to all study participants at M68 post-primary vaccination. At M68, 33.3% (age group 2–5 years) and 47.1% (age group 6–10 years) of the children vaccinated with MenACWY-TT, and 50.0% (age group 2–5 years) and 75.9% (age group 6–10 years) vaccinated with MenC-CRM197 retained titers ≥1:8 for MenC, as assessed by a serum bactericidal assay using rabbit complement (rSBA). In the MenACWY-TT recipients, the percentages of children retaining rSBA titers ≥1:8 for MenA, MenW, and MenY were 81.7%, 47.3% and 66.7% in age group 2–5 years and 91.8%, 58,8% and 76.5% in age group 6–10 years, respectively. The booster dose induced robust responses (100% for all serogroups) and was well-tolerated. Antibody persistence (rSBA titers ≥ 1:8) for serogroups A, W and Y was observed in more than 50.0% of the children 68 M after receiving one dose of MenACWY-TT; for MenC, antibody persistence was observed in more than one third of MenACWY-TT and more than half of MenC-CRM197 recipients. Vaccination with a booster dose of MenACWY-TT induced robust immune responses for all serogroups.

Isoelectric focusing in very alkaline immobilized pH gradients (IPG) was adopted for checking the purity and assessing the pI value of two strongly alkaline proteases: Savinase and Durazym. The first enzyme (known to be the most alkaline) contains 5 Asp, 5 Glu, 7 His, 7 Tyr, 5 Lys, no Cys and 8 Arg residues and should have a theoretical pI of 9.7. Yet, when focused in a pH 9-11 IPG interval, it was lost in the cathodic compartment. After repeated attempts at creating even more alkaline pH intervals, a pH 10-12 IPG range was finally optimized and proved successful in focusing both enzymes midway between the two electrodic compartments. The pI of Savinase was measured as 11.15 +/- 0.15; that of Durazym as 10.95 +/- 0.20 and that of the pI marker cytochrome c as 10.6 +/- 0.17. Both enzymes (and a number of minor components in each preparation) were proven to be active by an in situ zymogram consisting of a casein/agar overlay. The discrepancy between theoretical and experimental pI values could not be fully reconciled: when correcting for pK values of amino acids in proteins at 10 degrees C, instead of the tabulated values at 25 degrees C, the pI should increase to a value of 10. Differential UV spectra showed that ca. 1/2 Tyr are buried in the protein interior and are thus unable to contribute to surface charge. This further increases the pI value by 0.3 pH units to a value of 10.3, still quite removed from the experimentally assessed pI value (in the gel, at 10 degrees C) of 11.15.